Trade-offs between the conflicting aspects of corporate sustainability (CS) have hindered the realization of win–win opportunities that advance both sustainable development and the bottom line. The question today is no longer whether these trade-offs are encountered in the pursuit of CS, but under which circumstances they occur, with which responses, and how best to navigate them. This study conducted a systematic review and content analysis of the trade-off literature published to-date at both conceptual and applied levels. Through this process, a hierarchical framework is proposed for the analysis of trade-offs based on their different categories, their root tensions, their interconnections, and where they are encountered in the practice of CS, from policy to implementation. Based on this, a number of recommendations are provided on how managers may better navigate the hierarchy of trade-off decision-making, to ultimately transform trade-offs into synergies. Several suggestions for future trade-off research are also provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
A note on definitions: the term corporate sustainability (CS) has been used here interchangeably with corporate social responsibility (CSR), responsibility, and sustainability. It is important to note however that some studies (e.g., Bansal and DesJardine 2014) have made subtle distinctions between these terms. Similarly, the terms firm and company have been used interchangeably as well.
As an example of the former: several articles (such as McWilliams and Siegel 1997; Xepapadeas and De Zeeuw 1999; Vilanova et al. 2009; Cainelli et al. 2013) examined the effect of improved responsibility against various dimensions of profitability or the manifest trade-off between financial and non-financial performance areas. Alternatively, for latent content: Minoja (2012) discussed the practical application of stakeholder theory to effectively manage multiple company stakeholders with competing objectives. This discussion features two underlying latent trade-off categories: which stakeholders to prioritize, and of these which stakeholder demands to respond to.
Thank you to an anonymous reviewer for this source suggestion.
Some references define it as being the trade-off between all three dimensions, while others consider it only from a binary perspective, either as environmental/social performance (E/SP) vs financial performance (FP) or to a lesser extent, environmental performance (EP) vs social performance(SP) (see: Angus-Leppan et al. 2010).
As the firm moves further along the implementation process, the trade-off between groups of salient stakeholders translates into a trade-off between which performance areas to target. The framework presented here groups these two types of trade-offs under the same ‘stakeholder’ trade-off category, given that conflicting stakeholder groups or conflicting stakeholder issues are inter-related and both assessed from a cost-benefit perspective (as described in Driessen and Hillebrand 2013).
Corporate social responsibility
Global reporting initiative
Ahmed, N. U. (2001). Incorporating environmental concerns into TQM. Production & Inventory Management Journal, 42(1), 25–30.
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic review. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.
Angus-Leppan, T., Benn, S., & Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 230–244.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.
Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–748.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
Beckmann, M., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. (2014). Commitment strategies for sustainability: How business firms can transform trade-offs into win–win outcomes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 18–37.
Berens, G., Van Riel, C. B. M., & Van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252.
Blanco, E., Rey-Maquieira, J., & Lozano, J. (2009). The economic impacts of voluntary environmental performance of firms: A critical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(3), 462–502.
Bryson, J. R., & Lombardi, R. (2009). Balancing product and process sustainability against business profitability: Sustainability as a competitive strategy in the property development process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2), 97–107.
Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1420–1430.
Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2013). Environmental performance, manufacturing sectors and firm growth: Structural factors and dynamic relationships. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 15(4), 367–387.
Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.
Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., & Paquet, M. (2011). Designing supply chains with sustainability considerations. Production Planning & Control, 22(8), 727–741.
Chen, C., & Zhang, J. (2013). Green product design with engineering tradeoffs under technology efficient frontiers: Analytical results and empirical tests. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 340–352.
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2013). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, (in press).
Csutora, M. (2011). From eco-efficiency to eco-effectiveness? The policy-performance paradox. Society and Economy, 33(1), 161–181.
Dai, J., & Blackhurst, J. (2012). A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(19), 5474–5490.
Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260.
Driessen, P. H., & Hillebrand, B. (2013). Integrating multiple stakeholder issues in new product development: An exploration integrating multiple stakeholder issues in new product development: An exploration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 364–379.
Drucker, P. F. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53–63.
Dutta, S., Lawson, R., & Marcinko, D. (2012). Paradigms for sustainable development: Implications of management theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 1–10.
Egels-Zandén, N., Hulthén, K., & Wulff, G. (2014). Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: The case of nudie jeans co. Journal of Cleaner Production, [In press].
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Epstein, M., Buhovac, A., & Yuthas, K. (2014). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48, 35–45.
Epstein, M., & Roy, M. (2003). Making the business case for sustainability: Linking social and environmental actions to financial performance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 79–96.
Epstein, M. J., & Widener, S. K. (2010). Identification and use of sustainability performance measures in decision-making. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 40, 43–73.
Escobar, L., & Vredenburg, H. (2011). Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: A resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 39–65.
Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2012). Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 92–102.
Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Nascimento, L. F. M. D. (2012). A learning and knowledge approach to sustainable operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 183–192.
George, A. (1959). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In R. Franzosi (Ed.), Content analysis: Volume 1 (2008) (pp. 222–243). London: SAGE Publications.
Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543.
Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679–704.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., & Liesen, A. (2012). Assessing trade-offs in investments for the environment–The case of a VOC-reduction investment at AUTO Group. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 114–128.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Editorial trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217–229.
Hahn, R., & Kuhnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2014). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132.
Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70–87.
Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.
Hart, S., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.
Herzig, C., & Godemann, J. (2010). Internet-supported sustainability reporting: Developments in germany. Management Research Review, 33(11), 1064–1082.
Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 447–482.
Holt, D., & Watson, A. (2008). Exploring the dilemma of local sourcing versus international development–the case of the flower industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 318–329.
Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610.
Joseph, G. (2012). Ambiguous but tethered: An accounting basis for sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(2), 93–106.
Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2001). Sustainability management: Balancing conflicting economic, environmental, and social corporate responsibilities. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(2), 91–106.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Laine, M. (2005). Meanings of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29(4), 395–413.
Lekakos, G., Vlachos, P., & Koritos, C. (2014). Green is good but is usability better? Consumer reactions to environmental initiatives in e-banking services. Ethics and Information Technology, 16, 1–15.
Li, C. (2013). An integrated approach to evaluating the production system in closed-loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 4045–4069.
Li, N., & Toppinen, A. (2011). Corporate responsibility and sustainable competitive advantage in forest-based industry: Complementary or conflicting goals? Forest Policy & Economics, 13(2), 113–123.
Liu, C., & Huang, D. (2014). Reduction of power consumption and carbon footprints by applying multi-objective optimisation via genetic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(2), 337–352.
Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 409–422.
Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.
Martín-Peña, M., Díaz-Garrido, E., & Sánchez-López, J. (2014). Analysis of benefits and difficulties associated with firms’ Environmental Management Systems: The case of the Spanish automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 220–230.
Maxfield, S. (2008). Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 367–377.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). The role of money managers in assessing corporate social responsibility research. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 98–107.
Minoja, M. (2012). Stakeholder management theory, firm strategy, and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 67–82.
Morrison-Saunders, A., & Pope, J. (2013). Conceptualizing and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 54–63.
Nagurney, A., Yu, M., & Floden, J. (2013). Supply chain network sustainability under competition and frequencies of activities from production to distribution. Computational Management Science, 10(4), 397–422.
Network for Business Sustainability (NBS). 2008. Valuing business sustainability: A systematic review. Accessed from: http://nbs.net/wp-content/uploads/NBS-Systematic-Review-Valuing.pdf
Olson, E. L. (2013). It’s not easy being green: The effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 171–184.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D., & Waldman, D. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.
Paksoy, T., & Özceylan, E. (2014). Environmentally conscious optimization of supply chain networks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(6), 855–872.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2010). Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 261–272.
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green & competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 1995, 120–134.
Ramirez, G. A. (2012). Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations. Learning Organization, 19(1), 58–76.
Retief, F., Morrison-Saunders, A., Geneletti, D., & Pope, J. (2013). Exploring the psychology of trade-off decision-making in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 31(1), 13–23.
Reuter, C., Goebel, P., & Foerstl, K. (2012). The impact of stakeholder orientation on sustainability and cost prevalence in supplier selection decisions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 270–281.
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36.
Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544–555.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.
Stuart, J. A., Ammons, J. C., & Turbini, L. J. (1999). A product and process selection model with multidisciplinary environmental considerations. Operations Research, 47(2), 221–234.
Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.
Teng, M., Wu, S., & Chou, S. J. (2014). Environmental commitment and economic performance: Short-term pain for long-term gain. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 16–27.
Tranfield, R., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of a systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). (2013). UNGC Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2013. Accessed from: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/global_corporate_sustainability_report.html
Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A., & Maori, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility: A corporate branding perspective. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60.
Varenova, D., Samy, M., & Combs, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and profitability: Trade-off or synergy: Perceptions of executives of FTSE all-share companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(2), 190–215.
Venn, R., & Berg, N. (2013). Building competitive advantage through social intrapreneurship. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 2(1), 104–127.
Verbeke, A., & Tung, V. (2013). The future of stakeholder management theory: A temporal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 529–543.
Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 57–69.
Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 1994, 46–52.
Wang, F., Lai, X., & Shi, N. (2011). A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decision Support Systems, 51(2), 262–269.
Winn, M., Pinkse, J., & Illge, L. (2012). Case studies on trade-offs in corporate sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(2), 63–68.
Wood, M. O., Noseworthy, T. J., & Colwell, S. R. (2013). If you can’t see the forest for the trees, you might just cut down the forest: The perils of forced choice on “seemingly” unethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 515–527.
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 577–590.
Xepapadeas, A., & De Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental policy and competitiveness: The porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(2), 165–182.
About this article
Cite this article
Haffar, M., Searcy, C. Classification of Trade-offs Encountered in the Practice of Corporate Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 140, 495–522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2678-1
- Corporate sustainability
- Resource-based view