Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 403–421 | Cite as

Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives?



The increasing pressures to conserve biodiversity—particularly for industries based on the exploitation of natural resources—have reinforced the need to implement specific measures in this area. Corporate commitment to preserving biodiversity is increasingly scrutinized by stakeholders and now represents an important aspect of business ethics. Although stakeholder involvement is often essential to the management of biodiversity, very few studies in the literature have focused on the details of this involvement. The objective of this paper is to analyze how mining and forestry companies can manage biodiversity issues through stakeholder involvement based on a content analysis of 430 sustainability reports using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. The paper elucidates the reasons for such involvement, the nature of stakeholders involved, and the types of measures employed to manage biodiversity. Stakeholders’ motives for becoming involved revolve around four main issues: complexity and knowledge management; self-regulation and relationships with public authorities; legitimacy and social responsiveness; and commercial and strategic objectives. The stakeholders involved in biodiversity initiatives are essentially non-governmental organizations, experts and universities, public authorities, and coalitions of companies. In the end, the initiatives identified can be grouped into three categories: management practices, socio-political actions, and research and conservation measures. The paper provides various examples of these initiatives and shows how they can be implemented in collaboration with different stakeholders depending on the company’s objectives. The contributions the study makes to the literature on biodiversity management and the managerial implications of the study are analyzed in the discussion section.


Biodiversity management Forestry Inter-organizational collaboration Mining Stakeholder theory Sustain ability 


  1. Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal, P., & Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonini, S. & Oppenheim, J. (2010). The next environmental issue for business: McKinsey Global Survey results, McKinsey & Company. (Consulted in June 2013).
  7. Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society & Natural Resources, 15(1), 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butchart, S. H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P., Almond, R. E.,… & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164–1168.Google Scholar
  10. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.Google Scholar
  12. Cardskadden, H., & Lober, D. J. (1998). Environmental stakeholder management as business strategy: The case of the corporate wildlife habitat enhancement programme. Journal of Environmental Management, 52(2), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CERES. (2014). Gaining ground: corporate progress on the CERES roadmap for sustainability. Accessed June 2013 from
  14. Chieh-Wen, S., & Ming-Chia, C. (2011). Is moral intensity applicable to natural environment issues? African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7533–7541.Google Scholar
  15. Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of U.S. corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). (Consulted in February 2014).
  18. Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Didham, R. K. (2011). Life after logging: Strategic withdrawal from the Garden of Eden or tactical error for wilderness conservation? Biotropica, 43(4), 393–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobele, A. R., Westberg, K., Steel, M., & Flowers, K. (2013). An examination of corporate social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the Australian mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher, B., Edwards, D. P., Larsen, T. H., Ansell, F. A., Hsu, W. W., Roberts, C. S., & Wilcove, D. S. (2011). Cost-effective conservation: Calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia. Conservation Letters, 4(6), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fletcher, R. (2009). Ecotourism discourse: Challenging the stakeholders theory. Journal of Ecotourism, 8(3), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser, E. D., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam: GRI.Google Scholar
  32. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2007). Biodiversity: A GRI reporting resource. Amsterdam: GRI.Google Scholar
  33. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2014). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: Frequently asked questions. Amsterdam: GRI.Google Scholar
  34. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholder for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ICMM (International Council on Mining & Metals). (2003). 10 sustainable development principles. (Consulted in February 2014).
  38. ICMM (International Council on Mining & Metals). (2006). Mining and biodiversity good practice guidance. (Consulted in February 2014).
  39. ICMM (International Council on Mining & Metals). (2010). Mining and biodiversity: A collection of case studies. (Consulted in February 2014).
  40. Jackson, L. L., Lopoukhine, N., & Hillyard, D. (1995). Ecological restoration: A definition and comments. Restoration Ecology, 3(2), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2013). Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 668–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kapoor, I. (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kitula, A. G. N. (2006). The environmental and socio-economic impacts of mining on local livelihoods in Tanzania: A case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kohlbacher, F. (2005).The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 7. Accessed June 2013.
  48. KPMG. (2013). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zurich: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  49. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mahanty, S., & Russell, D. (2002). High stakes: Lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Society & Natural Resources, 15(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  54. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Owen, D., Swift, T., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pistorius, T., & Reinecke, S. (2013). The interim REDD + partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards? Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Polonsky, M. J. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prakash, A. (2002). Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Putz, F. E., Blate, G. M., Redford, K. H., Fimbel, R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Tropical forest management and conservation of biodiversity: An overview. Conservation Biology, 15, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rands, M. R., Adams, W. M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S. H., Clements, A., Coomes, D., & Vira, B. (2010). Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science, 329(5997), 1298–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rimmel, G., & Jonäll, K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: Corporate disclosure and preparers’ views. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 746–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rogers, E., & Weber, E. P. (2010). Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 546–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salafsky, N., Cauley, H., Balachander, G., Cordes, B., Parks, J., Margoluis, C.,… & Margoluis, R. (2001). A Systematic Test of an Enterprise Strategy for Community‐Based Biodiversity Conservation. ConservationBiology15(6), 1585-1595.Google Scholar
  69. Sarkis, J., González-Torre, P., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). (2010). Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. (Consulted in February 2014).
  71. Schwartzman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2005). Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  73. Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turcotte, M. F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Unerman, J., Bebington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2007). Sustainability, Accounting and accountability. New York: Routhledge.Google Scholar
  76. VanLiempd, D., & Busch, J. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 833–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Winn, M. I., & Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26(2), 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wishart, R. (2012). Coal River’s Last Mountain King Coal’s Après moi le déluge Reign. Organization & Environment, 25(4), 470–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. WWF. (2014). Living Planet Report 2014, (Consulted in September 2014).
  82. Young, J. C., Jordan, A. R., Searle, K., Butler, A. S., Chapman, D., Simmons, P., & Watt, A. D. (2013). Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation, 158, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Young, J., Richards, C., Fischer, A., Halada, L., Kull, T., Kuzniar, A., et al. (2007). Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the Central and Eastern European countries. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zimmerman, B., Peres, C. A., Malcolm, J. R., & Turner, T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Faculty of Business AdministrationPavillon Palasis-PrinceQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Management, University College of Business StudiesUniversity of the Basque Country UPV-EHUSan SebastianSpain

Personalised recommendations