Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 477–493 | Cite as

“How does Sustainability Leadership Affect Firm Performance? The Choices Associated with Appointing a Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility”

  • Frank Wiengarten
  • Chris K. Y. Lo
  • Jessie Y. K. Lam
Article

Abstract

Recent years have seen a significant increase in stakeholder pressure on firms to be not only economically sustainable but also from an environmental and social perspective. Besides operational changes in practices and products companies have reacted toward this increased pressure from a strategic perspective through structural changes of their top management team (TMT). A recent addition to the TMT has been the appointment of the chief officer of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this paper, we take a behavioral perspective and investigate how the employment of a chief officer of CSR to the TMT impact on firm performance. Specifically, we explore how certain characteristics of the newly appointed chief executive of CSR impact on a firm’s financial performance. We collected secondary, longitudinal data of listed companies in the United States. Results indicate that appointing a chief executive of CSR does under certain conditions and characteristics result in financial performance benefits. Furthermore, the greatest financial performance benefits can be achieved if the appointee is female and has a CSR functional background.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Financial performance Top management team 

References

  1. Antle, R., & Smith, A. (1986). An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barskey, R., Kimball, M., Shapiro, M. (1996). Preference parameters and behavorial heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement survey. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper series, July (5667).Google Scholar
  4. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences In proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowcz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton, M. K. (1993). Organizational innovation and substandard performance: When is necessity the mother of innovation? Organization Science, 4(1), 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, D. E., Chandy, R. K., & Cunha, M. (2010). When do chief marketing officers affect Ffrm value? A customer power explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1162–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butz, C. E., & Lewis, P. V. (1996). Correlation of gender-related values of independence and relationship and leadership orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, E. E. (1971). The behavioral theory of the firm and top-level corporate decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterjee, D., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). Examining the shareholders wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Dart, R., & Hill, S. D. (2010). Green matters? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Datta, D. K., & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Executive succession: organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(2), 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dherment-Ferere, I., Renneboog, L. (2000). Share price reactions to CEO resignations and large shareholder monitoring in listed French companies. Discussion paper 2000-70, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Firm performance, Governance Structure, and top management turnover in a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1289–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman, S. D., & Singh, H. (1989). CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 718–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furtado, E. P., & Karan, V. (1994). Internal/external top management succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  24. Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2006). Does hiring a new CFO change things? An investigation of changes in discretionary accruals. Accounting Review, 81(4), 781–809.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, J. F., Stendardi, E. J., Myers, J. K., & Graham, M. (2002). Gender differences in investment strategies: an information processing perspective. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guadalupe, M., Li, H., & Wulf, J. (2014). Who lives in the c-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science, 60(4), 824–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guthrie Datta, J. P. D. K. (1997). Contextual influences on executive selection: Firm characteristics and CEO experience. Journal of Management Studies, 34(4), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  30. Helmich, D. (1977). Executive succession in the corporate organization: A current integration. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 252–266.Google Scholar
  31. Hendricks, K.B., Hora, M., Singhal, V.R. (2014). An empirical investigation on the appointments of supply chain and operations management executives. Management Science (article in press).Google Scholar
  32. Hillestad, T., Xie, C., & Haugland, S. A. (2010). Innovative corporate social responsibility: The founder’s role in creating a trustworthy corporate brand through “green innovation”. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 19(6), 440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, D. R. (1985). Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hsu, C. C., & Boggs, D. J. (2003). Internationalization and performance: Traditional measures and their decomposition. Multinational Business Review, 11(3), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huson, M. R., Parrino, R., & Starks, L. T. (2001). International monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. Journal of Finance, 56, 2265–2297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. L., & Schneider, S. C. (2010). Gender differences in leadership—believing is seeing: Implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(6), 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Joshi, M. P., Kathuria, R., & Porth, S. J. (2003). Alignment of strategic priorities and performance: An Integration of operations and strategic management perspectives. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kang, J.-K., & Shivdasani, A. (1996). Does the Japanese governance system enhance shareholder wealth? Evidence from the stock-price effects of top management turnover. Review of Financial Studies, 9(4), 1061–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerin, R. A. (2005). Strategic marketing and the CMO, in marketing renaissance: Opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice, and infrastructure. Journal of Marketing, 69, 12–14.Google Scholar
  41. Kind, A., Schläpfer, Y. (2010). Is a CEO turnover good or bad news? Working paper, Department of Finance, University of Basel.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, P. M., & James, E. H. (2007). She’-e-os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lo, C. K. Y., Pagell, M., Dan, D., Wiengarten, F., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2014). OHSAS 18001 certification and operating performance: The role of complexity and coupling. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lo, C. K. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Longsworth, A., Doran, H., & Webber, J. (2012). The sustainability executive: Profile and progress. London: PriecewaterhouseCoopers LLP.Google Scholar
  46. Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42–50.Google Scholar
  47. Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marcel, J. J. (2009). Why top management team characteristics matter when Employing a chief operating officer: A strategic contingency perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McGovern, G. J., Court, D., Quelch, J. A., & Crawford, B. (2004). Bringing customers into the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 82, 70–80.Google Scholar
  53. Menz, M. (2012). Functional top Management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(1), 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mian, S. (2001). On the choice and replacement of chief financial officers. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pagell, M., Wiengarten, F., Lo, C.K.Y., Humphreys, P. (2014). For workers there is no risk paradox. Working paper, ESADE Business School.Google Scholar
  59. Perrow, C. (1970). Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. In M. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations (pp. 59–89). Nashville: Vanderbild University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prime, J., Jonsen, K., Carter, N., & Maznevski, M. L. (2008). Managers’ perceptions of women and men leaders: A cross cultural comparison. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(2), 171–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sarkis, J., Gonzales-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental Practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Savin, N. E., & White, K. J. (1977). The Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors. Econometrica, 45(8), 1989–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. NewYork: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schwartz, K. B., & Menon, K. (1985). Executive succession in failing firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1972). Organizational theory: A structural and behavioral analysis. Homewoo: Irwin.Google Scholar
  71. Shen, W, Jr, & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Will succession planning increase shareholder wealth? Evidence from investor reactions to relay CEO successions. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strand, R. (2014). Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
  74. Sweeney, P. D., & Mcfarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tata, J. (2000). Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles. Journal of Psychology, 134(3), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walsh, J. P. (1988). Selectivity and selective Perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 873–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weinreb (2011). CSO back story: How chief sustainability officers reached the C-suite. Weinreb Group, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  78. Weinzimmer, L. G., Bond, E. U., Houston, M. B., & Nystrom, P. C. (2003). Relating marketing expertise on the top management team and strategic market agressiveness to financial performance and shareholder value. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wiengarten, F., & Pagell, M. (2012). The importance of quality management for the success of environmental management initiative. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Worrell, D. L., Wallace, N. D., III, & Glascock, J. L. (1993). Stockholder reactions to departures and appointments of key executives attributable to firings. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zajac, E. J. (1990). CEO Selection, succession, compensation and firm Performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zajac, E., & Westphal, J. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zorn, D. (2004). Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the american firm. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Wiengarten
    • 1
  • Chris K. Y. Lo
    • 2
  • Jessie Y. K. Lam
    • 2
  1. 1.ESADE School of BusinessRamon Llull UniversityBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations