The Role of Board Environmental Committees in Corporate Environmental Performance
- 572 Downloads
This study explores the relationship between board environmental committees and corporate environmental performance (CEP). We propose that board environmental committees will be positively associated with CEP. Moreover, we argue that the composition of the committee (i.e., stakeholder representation) as well as the presence of a sustainability manager will influence this relationship. Our results find support for a positive association between board environmental committees and CEP. Further, the presence of a senior-level environmental manager positively moderates this relationship, but is not effective in isolation. Unexpectedly, no support was found for the influences of stakeholder representation.
KeywordsCorporate environmental performance Environmental governance Board committees Sustainability manager
- Adams, R. B. (2003). What do boards do? Evidence from board committee and director compensation data (March 13). EFA 2005 Moscow Meetings Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=397401 (From the Social Sciences Research Network Website).
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Anderson, C. A., & Anthony, R. N. (1986). The new corporate directors: Insights for board members and executives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
- Ayuso, S., & Argandona, A. (2007). Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors? Working Paper No. 701. IESE Business School, Barcelona.Google Scholar
- Bansal, P. (1997). Business strategy and the environment. In P. Bansal & E. Howard (Eds.), Business and the natural environment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Berle, A. A., Means, G. C., & Columbia University. (1932). Modern corporation and private property. Council for Research in the Social Sciences. New York, Chicago: Commerce Clearing House, Loose leaf service division of the Corporation Trust Company.Google Scholar
- Braiotta, L. Jr. & Sommer, A. A. (1987). The essential guide to effective corporate board committees. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- D’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13, 226–240.Google Scholar
- Daily, C., Dalton, D., & Cannella, A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
- Davis, J. H., Schoorman, D. F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
- Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
- Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
- Jones, T. M., & Goldberg, L. D. (1982). Governing the large corporation: More arguments for public directors. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 603–611.Google Scholar
- Lam, K., & Li, Y. (2008). Does corporate governance matter?: The case of environmental and social responsibility committees in the board. Working paper. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Lester, R. H. (2003). A road less traveled: Investigating the outside directors of America’s corporate boards. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, p. 212; AAT3104010.Google Scholar
- Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates : The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Lublin, J. S. (2008). Environmentalism sprouts up on corporate boards. Wall Street Journal, 11, B6.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
- Odell, A. M. (2008). Getting on board with corporate social responsibility. Social Funds: Sustainability Investment News. SRI World Group. Aug. 25. http://dev.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/article2545.html. Accessed Feb. 2014.
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Platts & Capgemini. (2008). Platts/Capgemini utilities executive study. http://www.capgemini-consulting.com/north-american-plattscapgemini-utilities-executive-study. Accessed Sept. 2011.
- Spencer Stewart (2013). 2013 Spencer Stuart Board Index, available at https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media/PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/SSBI-2013_01Nov2013.pdf.
- Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2014). http://www.sec.gov/.
- Vance, S. C. (1983). Corporate leadership: Boards, directors, and strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Waldo, C. N. (1985). Boards of directors: Their changing roles, structure, and information needs. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
- Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
- Zahra, S., & Stanton, W. (1988). The implications of boards of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management, 5(2), 229–236.Google Scholar