Abstract
In the last decade, Australian federal and state governments’ commitment to the economic rationalist imperatives of performance measures, accountability for outcomes, and value-for-money has driven significant change in the Australian not-for-profit community services sector. In an environment shaped by neoliberal-inspired government policies and a renewed government commitment to austerity, Australian not-for-profit community service organizations are now, more than ever, actively engaged in a variety of income-generating strategies to achieve and/or maintain economic sustainability. Central to this process is meeting the dual challenge of succeeding financially in a competitive environment and simultaneously serving mission. In this context, it is time to more closely examine the impact of these challenges, in particular the implications for the organizational values of not-for-profit community service providers themselves. This paper reports on a qualitative study of fourteen not-for-profit community service organizations, their core purposes, and their strategies for economic sustainability. In addition to the new data presented here, this paper contributes to the broader theoretical framework—the lens of value pluralism, which, we argue, provides a sharper focus on the relationship between mission and margin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A person-centered approach establishes a partnership between the service user, their families and carers, and the organizations that support them. At an organizational level it has practical implications for everyday service delivery and is also more broadly embedded in all aspects of an organization’s management and objectives (NSW Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care 2009).
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (Eds.). (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. NewJersey: Prentice-Hall.
Austin, J. (2000). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. New Jersey: Jossey Bass.
Barraket, J. (Ed.). (2008). Strategic issues for the not-for-profit sector. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2011). Surviving mission drift: How charities can turn dependence on government contract funding to their own advantage. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 217–231.
Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Brown, A. (1998). Organisational culture. London: Financial Times Management.
Bryce, H. (1992). Financial and strategic management for nonprofit organisations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Burke, K. (2008, May 22). Benevolent development lacks charity, say residents. Sydney Morning Herald.
Chappell, T. (1998). Understanding human goods. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Commission, Productivity. (2010). Contribution of the not-for-profit sector. Research Report. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
Crowder, G. (2003). Pluralism, relativism and liberalism in Isaiah Berlin. Australasian Political Studies Association Conference University of Tasmania, Hobart 29 September–1 October 2003. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.utas.edu.au/government/APSA/GCrowder.doc.pdf.
de la Rama, M. I., Edwards, M. T., Dalton, B. M., & Green, J. M. (2010). Honourable intentions? Analysing the interests of private equity in the aged care sector. Third Sector Review, 16(3), 63–82.
Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector bending: Blurring the lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society (Social Sciences and Modern Society), 40(4), 16–27.
Department of Finance (1995). Clarifying the exchange: A review of purchaser/provider arrangements. Discussion Paper no. 2, Canberra.
Ellison, N. (2006). The transition of welfare states?. London: Routledge.
Ford Foundation (2008). 2007 Annual Report 3. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/ar07/FF_AR07.pdf.
Ford Foundation (2014) Home Page. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.fordfoundation.org.
Fremont-Smith, M. R. (1965). Foundations and government: State and federal law and supervision. New York: Russell Sage.
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being a nonprofit: A conceptual primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 141–164. [Supplement].
Gates Foundation (2012). College-ready education. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/college-ready-education/Pages/default.aspx.
Grey, J. (1996). Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Grey, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism. New York: The New Press.
Head, B. (2005). Governance. In P. Saunders & J. Walter (Eds.), Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia (pp. 44–63). Sydney: UNSW Press.
Hitt, W. D. (1988). The leader-manager: Guidelines for action. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
Hoenisch, S. (2002). Max Webber’s view of objectivity in social science. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.criticism.com/md/weber1/html.
Jamrozik, A. (2006). Social policy in the post-welfare state: Australian society in the 21st century. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia.
Jeavons, T. (1992). When management is the message: Relating values to management practice in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2(4), 403–417.
Jenkins, G. (2011). Who’s afraid of philanthrocapitalism. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 61(3), 754–821.
Longstaff, S. (1995). Balancing shareholders’ needs with corporate philanthropy. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.ethics.org.au/ethics-articles/balancing-shareholders-needs-corporate-philanthropy.
Lyons, M. (2001). Third sector. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Marsland, D. (1996). Welfare or welfare state? Contradictions and dilemmas in social policy. London: Macmillan.
Mason, E. (2006). Value pluralism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-pluralism/.
Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.
NSW Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care (2009). Exploring and implementing person centred approaches. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.adhc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0005/228290/DADHC_PersonCentred201208.pdf.
NSW Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care (2012). Annual Report. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/250961/Annual_Report_2010-11_Ageing_Disability_and_Home_Care.pdf.
Onyx, J. (1998). Career motivation: A cross sector analysis. Third Sector Review, 4(1), 43–54.
Oster, S. M. (1995). Strategic management for nonprofit organisations: Theory and cases. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perry, N. O. (2000). Strategic alliances. Working knowledge: A report on research at Harvard Business School, 3(4). Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/1263.html.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Pusey, M. (2010). The struggles of public intellectuals in Australia: What do they tell us about contemporary Australia and the Australian ‘political public sphere’? Thesis Eleven, 101(1), 81–88.
Quiggin, J. (2005). Economic liberalism: Fall, revival and resistance. In P. Saunders & J. Walter (Eds.), Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia (pp. 21–43). Sydney: UNSW Press.
Ramia, G., & Carney, T. (2000). Contractualism, managerialism and welfare: the Australian experiment with a marketised employment services network. Policies and Politics, 29(1), 59–83.
Ryan, W. (1999). The new landscape for nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 77, 127–136.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Seevers, B. (2000). Identifying and clarifying organizational values. Journal of Agriculture Education, 4(3), 70–79.
Skorupski, J. (1996). Value pluralism. In D. Archard (Ed.), Philosophy and pluralism (pp. 105–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sunder, S. (2003). Being value driven. Deccan Herald, July. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/july23/av5.asp.
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, M., & Hoggett, P. (1994). Quasi-markets and the transformation of the independent sector. In W. Bartlett, C. Propper, W. Wilson, & J. Le Grand (Eds.), Quasi markets in the welfare state (pp. 184–206). Bristol: SAUS Publications.
van Staveren, I. (2001). The values of economics: An Aristotelian perspective. London: Routledge.
Webster, A. (2010). Political wolves in charity sheep’s clothing? The outsourcing of welfare to the faith-based sector under the Howard Government. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Webster, E. & Harding, G. (2000). Outsourcing public service employment services: The Australian experience. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No 4/00 March. Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research, Melbourne.
Weisbrod, B. A. (2004). The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2(3), 40–47.
Zappalà, G., & Lyons, M. (2008). Not-for-profit organisations and business: Mapping the extent and scope of community-business partnerships in Australia. In J. Barraket (Ed.), Strategic issues for the not-for-profit sector (pp. 16–44). Sydney: UNSW Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, J., Dalton, B. Out of the Shadows: Using Value Pluralism to Make Explicit Economic Values in Not-for-Profit Business Strategies. J Bus Ethics 139, 299–312 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2618-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2618-0