Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 327–347 | Cite as

Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making

  • Kathyayini Rao
  • Carol Tilt
Article

Abstract

This paper aims to critically review the existing literature on the relationship between corporate governance, in particular board diversity, and both corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR) and to suggest some important avenues for future research in this field. Assuming that both CSR and CSRR are outcomes of boards’ decisions, this paper proposes that examining boards’ decision making processes with regard to CSR would provide more insight into the link between board diversity and CSR. Particularly, the paper stresses the importance of studies linking gender diversity and CSR decision making processes, which is quite rare in the existing literature. It also highlights the importance of more qualitative methods and longitudinal studies for the development of understanding of the diversity–CSR relationship.

Keywords

Corporate governance Corporate social responsibility Corporate social responsibility reporting Board diversity Gender diversity Decision making process 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks reviewers, discussant and participants for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62, 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1331–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2013). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arguden, Y. (2012). Why boards need more women. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  7. Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayuso, S., & Argandoña, A. (2007). Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors. Working Paper. Navarra: University of Navarra.Google Scholar
  9. Balta, M. E., Woods, A., & Dickson, K. (2010). The influence of boards of directors’ characteristics on strategic decision-making: Evidence from Greek companies. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 26(3), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barako, D. G., & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, 15, 15–21.Google Scholar
  13. Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Bilimoria, D., & Wheeler, J. V. (2000). Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. Women in Management: Current Research Issues, 2, 138–163.Google Scholar
  15. Bøhren, Ø. Y., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 1281–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Braun, P. (2010). Going green: Women entrepreneurs and the environment. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 885–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burke, R. J. (2000). Women on corporate boards of directors: Understanding the context. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities, 14, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. The Academy of Management Journal, 44, 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  23. Carter, D. A., D’souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Catanzariti, J., & Lo, M. (2011). Corporate governance changes focus on diversity. Retrieved May 11, 2005, from http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/discriminationand_diversityinsights/20110511/corporate_governance_changes_focus_on_diversity.page.
  26. Chau, G., & Gray, S. J. (2010). Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299–317.Google Scholar
  28. Chen, C. J. P., & Jaggi, B. (2001). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen, X., & Van Staden, C. (2010). Stakeholder pressure, social trust, governance and the disclosure quality of environmental information. Sydney: APIRA.Google Scholar
  30. Cheng, E., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 262–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chin, M., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. CPA Australia. (2005). The power of three. Available: http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au. Accessed 20 July 2012.
  34. Cr-Index. (2014). Insight report: Integrating, measuring and managing responsible business practice. London: Business in the Community.Google Scholar
  35. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. De Graaf, F. J., & Herkströter, C. A. (2007). How corporate social performance is institutionalised within the governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. De Villiers, C., Van Staden, C., & Naiker, V. (2009). Good corporate governance makes for good environmental performance. In AFAANZ conference (pp. 5–7).Google Scholar
  38. Deegan, C. (1999). Triple Bottom Line Reporting: It’s the new reporting approach for the organisation of the future. Charter-Sydney, 70, 38–41.Google Scholar
  39. Deloitte. (2011). Deloitte releases second edition of “Women in the boardroom: A global perspective”. Marketwire.Google Scholar
  40. Donnelly, R., & Mulcahy, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 416–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5, 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Elkington, J. (1999). Triple bottom line revolution: reporting for the third millennium. Australian CPA, 69, 75–76.Google Scholar
  45. Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 522–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. EOWA. (2008). A gender in the boardroom. Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency (EOWA): Canberra.Google Scholar
  49. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W., & Konrad, A. M. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? In S. Vinnicombe & M. Singh (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and Practice (pp. 222–232). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  51. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 31–38.Google Scholar
  52. Fielden, S. L., & Davidson, M. (2005). International handbook of women and small business entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Fondas, N. (2000). Women on boards of directors: Gender bias or power threat (pp. 171–177). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghazali, N. A. M. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance, 7, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33, 1–9.Google Scholar
  58. Grady, D. (1999). No more board games!. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3 17–25.Google Scholar
  59. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1145–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2007). Transparency and corporate governance. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2007.Google Scholar
  65. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ho, S. S. M., & Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, 139–156.Google Scholar
  67. Homan, A. C., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Htay, S. N. N., Rashid, H. M. A., Adnan, M. A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22, 604–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 16, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hung, H. (2011). Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ibrahim, N., & Angelidis, J. (1991). Effects of board members’ gender on level of involvement in strategic management and corporate social responsiveness orientation. In Proceedings of the Northeast Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 208–210).Google Scholar
  73. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (2011). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ingley, C. B. (2008). Company growth and Board attitudes to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. The Academy of Management Journal, 35, 766–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kabongo, J. D., Chang, K., & Li, Y. (2013). The impact of operational diversity on corporate philanthropy: An empirical study of US companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kakabadse, A. P. (2007). Being responsible: Boards are reexamining the bottom line. Leadership in Action, 27, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kemp, S. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Lessons from the land of OZ. Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kent, P., & Monem, R. (2008). What drives TBL reporting: Good governance or threat to legitimacy? Australian Accounting Review, 18, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Khan, M. H. U. Z. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52, 82–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Knudsen, J. S., Geisler, K., & Ege, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the board room—When do directors pay attention? Human Resource Development International, 16, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors. Working Paper (Job Market Paper). Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, 31 May 2010.Google Scholar
  94. Kulik, C. (2011). Women on boards: Glass ceiling or glass cliff? Unisabusiness. Google Scholar
  95. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review,. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.Google Scholar
  96. Lorenzo, J. M. P., Sánchez, I. M. G., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2009). Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa*/Characteristics of the board of directors and information in matters of corporate social responsability. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 38, 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mackenzie, C. (2007). Boards, Incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Maharaj, R. (2009). Corporate governance decision-making model: How to nominate skilled board members, by addressing the formal and informal systems. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6, 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mahoney, L., & Thorne, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mallin, C. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Marimuthu, M., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Ethnic and gender diversity in boards of directors and their relevance to financial performance of Malaysian companies. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2, P139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. McElhaney, K. (2009). A strategic approach to corporate social responsibility. Leader to Leader, 52, 30–36.Google Scholar
  104. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. McKendall, M., Sánchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2013). Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.Google Scholar
  108. Melo, T. (2012). Determinants of corporate social performance: The influence of organizational culture, management tenure and financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 8, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Miller, T., & Del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 755–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 301–316.Google Scholar
  111. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010a). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010b). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ogbechie, C., Koufopoulos, D. N., & Argyropoulou, M. (2009). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: The Nigerian perspective. Management Research News, 32, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. O’shannassy, T. (2010). Board and CEO practice in modern strategy-making: How is strategy developed, who is the boss and in what circumstances? Journal of Management and Organization, 16, 280–298.Google Scholar
  116. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on US Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50, 189–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Powell, G. N. (1990). One more time: Do female and male managers differ? The Executive, 4, 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P.-J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Pugliese, A., & Wenstøp, P. Z. (2007). Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. In Age. Oslo: Nordic Innovation Centre.Google Scholar
  123. Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance, 12, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. Á., & Sanchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance, 5, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rindova, V. P. (1999). What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 953–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 11, 21–31.Google Scholar
  127. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1201–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Sahin, K., Basfirinci, C. S., & Ozsalih, A. (2011). The impact of board composition on corporate financial and social responsibility performance: Evidence from public-listed companies in Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 2959–2978.Google Scholar
  130. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5, 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Setó‐Pamies, D. (2013). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.Google Scholar
  132. Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2007). Corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24, 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372.Google Scholar
  134. Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ. European Management Journal, 26, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V., & Dennis, B. S. (2001). An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Business and Society, 40, 266–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Kock, A. (2011). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: the relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management.Google Scholar
  140. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Triana, M. D. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2013). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25, 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hägele, S., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61, 1463–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. van Knippenberg, D., & Haslam, S. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology and reality. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 61–77). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  145. van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity, and group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.Google Scholar
  147. Vinnicombe, S. (2009). Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  148. Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 771–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Watson, W. E., Johnson, L., & Merritt, D. (1998). Team orientation, self-orientation, and diversity in task groups their connection to team performance over time. Group and Organization Management, 23, 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1113–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398.Google Scholar
  156. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wise, V., & Mahboob Ali, M. (2008). Case studies on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. South Asian Journal of Management, 15, 136–149.Google Scholar
  159. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce Ii, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15, 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Zahra, S. A., & Stanton, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management, 5, 229–236.Google Scholar
  161. Zelechowski, D. D., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Zelechowski, S., & Bilimoria, D. (2006). Characteristics of CEOs and boards with women inside directors. Corporate Board: Roles, Duties and Composition, 2, 14–21.Google Scholar
  163. Zhang, L. (2012). Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 12, 686–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders Business SchoolFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.University of South Australia Business SchoolAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations