Skip to main content
Log in

Humility in Business: A Contextual Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The virtue of humility is often considered to be at odds with common business practice. In recent years, however, scholars within business ethics and leadership have shown an increasing interest in humility. Despite such attention, the argument for the relevance of humility in business could be expanded. Unlike extant research that focuses on humility as a character-building virtue or instrumentally useful leadership trait, this article argues that humility reflects the interdependent nature of business. Through such an approach, the article gives an extrinsic motivation of the relevance of humility in business, and, from a theoretical point of view, links the intra-personal and intra-organizational perspective on humility to an inter-organizational one. The article contextualizes the virtue of humility by relating it to the economic, cognitive, and moral aspects of business practice and managerial work. It claims that the assumption of self-sufficiency in business is a grave misrepresentation of what business is—a practice characterized by interdependency. Potential links between virtue ethics, leadership, and contextually oriented theories of business, such as stakeholder theory, network theories, and resource dependence theory, are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquinas, T. (1955–1957). Summa Contra Gentiles, Book IV (C. J. O’Neil, Trans.). New York: Hanover House. Retrieved July 3, 2014, from http://dhspriory.org/thomas/ContraGentiles.htm.

  • Argandoña, A. (2003). Fostering values in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the encyclical Caritas in Veritate. In M. Schlag & J. A. Mercado (Eds.), Free markets and the culture of common good (pp. 177–189). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. (2013). Reputation and humility in corporate management. Working Paper WP-1071-E. IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

  • Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. Vatican: Holy See.

  • Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. C. A., McBey, K., & Scott-Ladd, B. (2011). Ethical leadership in modern employment relationships: Lessons from St. Benedict. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2001). Level 5 Leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D. (2009). Conflicting stories of virtue in UK healthcare: Bringing together organisational studies and ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, B. (2013). Epistemic virtues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M. (2009). Stakeholder theory and the ‘black box problem’: Internal clarity or confusion? Philosophy of Management, 8(3), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M., & Prenkert, F. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management when focal firms are complex: A network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.clepro.2014.05.034.

  • Grenberg, J. (2005). Kant and the ethics of humility: A story of dependence, corruption and virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1751). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Retrieved July 3, 2014, from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4320/4320-h/4320-h.htm.

  • Jacobs, D. C. (2004). A pragmatist approach to integrity in business ethics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(3), 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallasvuo, O. P. (2007). Humility. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, S., & Rosette, A. S. (2008). Cultural variation in response to strategic emotions in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livaccari, C. (2014). Just who was Confucius, anyway? Asia Society. Retrieved June 26, 2014, from http://asiasociety.org/education/chinese-language-initiatives/just-who-was-confucius-anyway.

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. (2006). The application of Anglo-American corporate practices in societies influenced by Confucian values. Business and Society Review, 111(3), 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneaux, D. (2003). “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth”: An aspiration applicable to business? Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Ferraro, H. S. (2014). Leading with humility. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.). (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z., & Song, L. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhenman, E. (1964). Företagsdemokrati och företagsorganisation. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedts & Söners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozuel, C., & Kakabadse, N. (2010). Ethics, spirituality and self: Managerial perspective and leadership implications. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(4), 423–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N. E. (1995). Humility. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 29(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1999). A better way to think about business: How personal integrity leads to corporate success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, J. S. (2003). The moral irony of humility. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, 6(1), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengblad, S. (2002). Time and space in managerial work. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18(4), 543–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef, G. A. (2014). Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations, 67(9), 1145–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waley, A. (1938). The analects of Confucius. New York: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. W., & Knight, P. A. (1980). The utility of humility: Self-esteem, information search and problem-solving efficiency. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25(2), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Frostenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frostenson, M. Humility in Business: A Contextual Approach. J Bus Ethics 138, 91–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2601-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2601-9

Keywords

Navigation