Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Fair Trade and the Fetishization of Levinasian Ethics

Article

Abstract

The certification-based Fair Trade initiative has been steadily growing during the last two decades. While many scholars have analyzed its main characteristics and developments, only a few have assessed it against a concept of justice. And those exceptional cases have only focused on distributive justice, proving unable to grasp the important ethical elements that Fair Trade integrates in its project. In reaction to this, this article intends to critically examine what the Fair Trade movement proposes to be ‘fair’ by resorting to the thought of the French philosopher Emmanuel Lévinas. To accomplish this goal, a new understanding of his conception of justice is presented, one that seeks to overcome the limitations that the two most common interpretations in the literature suffer. The idea of Lévinas’ ‘dialectics of justice’ is used to discuss Fair Trade’s relation of alterity, its appropriation of the notion of ‘face’ and its commitment to and responsibility for marginalized producers and workers. This analysis shows that Fair Trade operates with what could be described as a fetishized understanding of Levinasian ethics that justifies a deeply unjust praxis.

Keywords

Fair trade Lévinas Ethics Justice Face Other 

References

  1. Aasland, D. (2004). On the ethics behind “business ethics”. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, C., & Fritsch, S. (2010). Global fair trade: Humanizing globalization and reintroducing the normative to international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacon, C. (2004). Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua? World Development, 33(3), 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon, C. (2010). Who decides What is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental Governance of standards, access, and price. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balineau, G., & Dufeu, I. (2010). Are fair trade goods credence goods? A new proposal, with french illustrations. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bankovsky, M. (2008). Social Justice after Kant: Between constructivism and deconstruction (Rawls, Habermas, Levinas, Derrida). Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Bankovsky, M. (2012). Perfecting justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth: A deconstructive perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Barham, E. (2002). Towards a theory of values-based labeling. Agriculture and Human Values, 19, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becchetti, L., & Huybrechts, B. (2008). The dynamics of fair trade as a mixed-form market. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 733–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beji-Becheur, A. (2008). Fair trade—Just how “Fair” are the exchanges? Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernasconi, R. (1997). The violence of the face: Peace and language in the thought of Levinas. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 23(6), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryant, R., & Goodman, M. (2004). Consuming narratives: The political ecology of ‘alternative’ consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns, L. (2008). Identifying concrete ethical demands in the face of the abstract other: Emmanuel Levinas’ pragmatic ethics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 34(3), 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chanter, T. (1997). The betrayal of philosophy: Emmanuel Levinas’s otherwise than being. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 23(6), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, N., Barnett, C., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2007). The political rationalities of fair trade consumption in the United Kingdom. Politics and Society, 35(4), 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, G. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99, 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. Gray (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Dubuisson-Quellier, S., Lamine, C., & Le Velly, R. (2011). Citizenship and consumption: Mobilisation in alternative food systems in France. SociologiaRuralis, 3, 304–323.Google Scholar
  20. Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.Google Scholar
  21. Fairtrade International (2011). Challenge and opportunity: Annual Review 2010–2011.Google Scholar
  22. Fairtrade International (2013). Unlocking the power: Annual Report 2012–2013.Google Scholar
  23. Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (2010). Growing stronger together: Annual Report 2009–2010.Google Scholar
  24. Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. New Left Review, 36, 69–88.Google Scholar
  25. Fridell, G. (2006). Fair Trade and neoliberalism: Assessing emerging perspectives. Latin American Perspectives, 33(6), 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gargarella, R. (1999). Las teorías de la justicia después de Rawls. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
  27. Griffiths, P. (2012). Ethical objections to fairtrade. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guthman, J. (2007). The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 39(3), 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas, J. (1994). Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 109–131.Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (2001). On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Henrici, J. (2007). Free trade, alternative trade and women in Peru: A first look. Journal of Developing Societies, 23(1–2), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herzog, A. (2002). Is liberalism “all we need”? Lévinas’ politics of surplus. Political Theory, 30(2), 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hudson, I., & Hudson, M. (2003). Removing the veil? Commodity fetishism, fair trade, and the environment. Organization Environment, 16(4), 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutchens, A. (2010). Empowering women through fair trade? Lessons from Asia. Third World Quarterly, 31(3), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaffee, D. (2007). Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jaffee, D. (2010). Fair Trade standards, corporate participation, and social movement responses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jari, B., Snowball, J., & Fraser, G. (2013). Is fairtrade in commercial farms justifiable? Its impact on commercial and small-scale producers in South Africa. Agrekon: Agricultural Economics Research, Policy and Practice in Southern Africa, 52(4), 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johannessen, S., & Wilhite, H. (2010). Who really benefits from fairtrade? An analysis of value distribution in fairtrade coffee. Globalizations, 7(4), 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kasente, D. (2012). Fair trade and organic certification in value chains: Lessons from a gender analysis from coffee exporting in Uganda. Gender and Development, 20(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keenan, H. (2013). The ethics of visuality: Lévinas and the contemporary gaze. New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  42. Kim, G., Lee, G., & Park, K. (2010). A cross-national investigation on how ethical consumers build loyalty toward fair trade brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lévinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. The Hague: MartinusHijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lévinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity: Conversations with PhillipeNemo. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lévinas, E. (1996). God and philosophy. In A. Peperzak, S. Critchley, & R. Bernasconi (Eds.), Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings (pp. 129–148). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lévinas, E. (1998). Entre nous: On thinking-of-the-other. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lévinas, E. (2011). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Pittsburgh: Dusquense University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Loacker, B., & Muhr, S. (2009). How can I become a responsible subject? Towards a practice-based Ethics of responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. MacDonald, K. (2007). Globalising justice within coffee supply chains? Fair Trade, Starbucks and the transformation of supply chain governance. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Manning, R. (2001). Beyond ethics to justice Through Lévinas and Derrida: The legacy of Lévinas. Quincy: Franciscan Press, Quincy University.Google Scholar
  54. Mansell, S. (2008). Proximity and rationalisation: The limits of a Levinasian Ethics in the context of corporate governance and regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marston, A. (2013). Justice for all? Material and semiotic impacts of fair trade craft certification. Geoforum, 44, 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nicholls, A. (2010). Fair trade: towards an economics of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  58. Paul, E. (2005). Evaluating fair trade as a development project: Methodological considerations. Development in Practice, 15(2), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peperzak, A. (1993). To the other: An introduction to the philosophy of Emmanuel Lévinas. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Plant, B. (2012). Is the Other radically “other”? A critical reconstruction of Levinas’ ethics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38(9), 977–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Raynolds, L. (2000). Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(3), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reinecke, J. (2010). Beyond a subjective theory of value and towards a ‘fair price’: an organizational perspective on Fairtrade minimum price setting. Organization, 17(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. What is a ‘fair price”? Ethics as sensemaking. Organization Science (in press). Google Scholar
  65. Rhodes, C. (2012). Ethics, alterity and the rationality of leadership justice. Human Relations, 65(10), 1311–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruben, R., & Fort, R. (2012). The impact of fair trade certification for coffee farmers in Peru. World Development, 40(3), 570–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ruben, R., Fort, R., & Zúñiga-Arias, G. (2009). Measuring the impact of fair trade on development. Development in Practice, 19(6), 777–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmelzer, M. (2010). Marketing morals, moralizing markets: Assessing the effectiveness of fair trade as a form of boycott. Management & Organizational History, 5(2), 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Shah, D., McLeod, D., Kim, E., Lee, S., Gotlieb, M., Ho, S., & Breivik, S. (2007). Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive “lifestyle politics”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simmons, W. (1999). The Third: Levinas’ theoretical move from an-archical ethics to the realm of justice and politics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 25(6), 83–104.Google Scholar
  72. Soares, C. (2008). Corporate legal responsibility: A Levinasian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Staricco, J. I., & Torres Faba, L. (2008) La justicia en el pensamiento de Emmanuel Lévinas. In Paper presented at the conference VI Jornadas Interdisciplinarias: Acerca del reconocimiento del Otro en la cultura contemporánea. Córdoba: School of Philosophy and Humanities, Catholic University of Córdoba.Google Scholar
  74. Stenn, T. (2013a). Comercio justo and justice: An examination of fair trade. Review of Radical Political Economics, 45(4), 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stenn, T. (2013b). Fair enough? Fair trade and the quality of life amongst Bolivia’s indigenous women artisans. Development in Practice, 23(3), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stenn, T. (2013c). The cultural and political intersection of fair trade and justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tahmasebi, V. (2010). Does Lévinas justify or transcend liberalism? Lévinas on human liberation. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(5), 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taminiaux, J. (1997). The early Levinas’s reply to Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 23(6), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition”. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Utting, K. (2009). Assessing the impact of fair trade coffee: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(1), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vail, J. (2010). Decommodification and egalitarian political economy. Politics & Society, 38(3), 310–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Valkila, J., Haaparanta, P., & Niemi, N. (2010). Empowering coffee traders? The coffee value chain from Nicaraguan fair trade farmers to finnish consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vásquez-León, M. (2010). Free markets and fair trade, collective livelihood struggles, and the cooperative model. Latin American Perspectives, 37(6), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  85. Watson, M. (2007). Trade justice and individual consumption choices: Adam Smith’s spectator theory and the moral constitution of the fair trade consumer. European Journal of International Relations, 13(2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. World Fair Trade Organization, & Fairtrade Labelling Organizations. (2009). A charter of fair trade values. Retrieved from http://www.fairtrade.net/fileadmin/user_upload/content/2009/about_us/documents/Fair_Trade_Charter.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2013.
  87. Zizek, S. (2002). The only good neighbor is a dead neighbor. Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, 1(2), 6–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and PoliticsCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations