Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 137, Issue 3, pp 475–490 | Cite as

Environmental Pressure and the Performance of Foreign Firms in an Emerging Economy

  • Nahyun Kim
  • Jon J. Moon
  • Haitao Yin
Article

Abstract

Does environmental management help foreign firms outperform local firms in emerging economies? While existing research suggests that environmental management may or may not benefit firm performance, the question is particularly under-investigated in the emerging economy context. Using the data on foreign investment into China, this study explores whether foreign firms that are under greater environmental pressure, at home or at the host, outperform comparable local firms in an emerging host country. In making this comparison, we use propensity-score matching and a difference-in-differences approach to handle the problem of endogeneity inherent in comparing the performances of foreign versus local firms. We find empirical support that foreign firms perform better than local firms when they are under high environmental pressure in the emerging host country, and this result is driven by the foreign firms originating from countries with high environmental pressure.

Keywords

Environmental pressure Stakeholder theory Foreign direct investment Emerging economy Firm performance  

Notes

Acknowledgments

Jon J. Moon acknowledges that this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A5A8023591). Haitao Yin wishes to thank the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71202071, 71322305 and 71421002).

References

  1. Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, J. M., & Javorcik, B. S. (2009). Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign direct investment and plant productivity in Indonesia. Journal of International Economics, 79(1), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach, D., & Allen, D. B. (2010). What every CEO needs to know about nonmarket strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(3), 41–48.Google Scholar
  4. Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘Green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berrone, P., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. (2007). Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance: A test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouquet, C., & Deutsch, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate social performance on a firm’s multinationality. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, L., & He, C. (2013). Corporate environmental responsibility and equity prices. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, S.-J., Chung, J., & Moon, J. J. (2013). When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, S. J., & Xu, D. (2008). Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2014). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1.
  14. Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2005). FDI and the capital intensity of “Dirty” sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 530–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dangelico, R., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dean, J. M., Lovely, M. E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ding, S., Jia, C., Wu, Z., & Yuan, W. (2014). Environmental management under subnational institutional constraints. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2388-0.
  26. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunning, J. H. (1981). International production and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Economist, T. (2013). Can China clean up fast enough? The Economist. Retrieved September 23, 2013 from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21583277-worlds-biggest-polluter-going-green-it-needs-speed-up-transition-can-china.
  30. Escobar, L., & Vredenburg, H. (2011). Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: A resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E. (1992). Business ethics: The state of the art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2009). A “Strategy Tripod” perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greaker, M. (2006). Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: A new look at the Porter-hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52(1), 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  38. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hennart, J. F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huang, C.-L., & Kung, F.-H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.Google Scholar
  46. Jaggi, B., & Freedman, M. (1992). An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19(5), 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jo, H., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance in the financial services sector. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2276-7.
  48. Kim, Y., & Statman, M. (2012). Do corporations invest enough in environmental responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. King, A. A., & Shaver, J. M. (2001). Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments’ environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  54. Lin, L., Moon, J. J., & Yin, H. (2014). Does international economic integration lead to a cleaner production in China? Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 525–536.Google Scholar
  55. Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2004). Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. MacGarvie, M. (2006). Do firms learn from international trade? Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mezias, J. M. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minor, D., & Morgan, J. (2011). CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  61. Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., & Abidin, S. (2014). The impact of corporate environmental performance on market risk: The Australian industry case. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16.Google Scholar
  62. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit–cost or the no-cost paradigm? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  64. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  65. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Qi, G., Zeng, S., Tam, C., Yin, H., & Zou, H. (2013). Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: A case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sánchez-Medina, P., Díaz-Pichardo, R., Bautista-Cruz, A., & Toledo-López, A. (2015). Environmental compliance and economic and environmental performance: Evidence from handicrafts small businesses in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 381–393.Google Scholar
  73. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44(4), 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spencer, J., & Gomez, C. (2011). MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 280–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. UNCTAD. (2010). World investment report 2010. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Vazquez-Brust, D. A., Liston-Heyes, C., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., & Burgos-Jiménez, J. (2010). Stakeholders pressures and strategic prioritisation: An empirical analysis of environmental responses in Argentinean firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walker, K., Ni, N., & Huo, W. (2014). Is the red dragon green? An examination of the antecedents and consequences of environmental proactivity in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–51.Google Scholar
  82. Walter, I. (1982). Environmentally induced industrial relocation to developing countries. Environment and Trade, 2, 235–256.Google Scholar
  83. Wong, E. (2013). Air pollution linked to 1.2 million premature deaths in China. The New York Times. Retrieved September 23, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-linked-to-1-2-million-deaths-in-china.html.
  84. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zeng, K., & Eastin, J. (2007). International economic integration and environmental protection: The case of China. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 971–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., & Tam, C. M. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Business Research & Education, Korea University Business SchoolKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Korea University Business SchoolKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Antai College of Economics and ManagementShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations