Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 137, Issue 1, pp 101–113 | Cite as

Consumers’ Responses to Public Figures’ Transgression: Moral Reasoning Strategies and Implications for Endorsed Brands

  • Joon Sung Lee
  • Dae Hee KwakEmail author
Article

Abstract

Public figures’ transgressions attract considerable media attention and public interest. However, little is understood about the impact of celebrity endorsers’ transgressions on associated brands. Drawing on research on moral reasoning, we posit that consumers are not always motivated to separate judgments of performance from judgments of morality (moral decoupling) or simply excuse a wrongdoer (moral rationalization). We propose that consumers also engage in moral coupling, a distinct moral reasoning process which allows consumers to integrate judgments of performance and judgments of morality. In three studies, we demonstrate that moral coupling is prevalent and has unique predictive utilities in explaining consumers’ evaluation of the transgressor (Studies 1 and 2). We also show that transgression type (performance related vs. performance unrelated) has a significant impact on consumers’ choice of moral reasoning strategy (Study 2). Finally, we demonstrate that consumers’ support for (or opposition toward) a brand endorsed by a transgressor is a direct function of moral reasoning choice (Study 3). Findings suggest that public figure’s immoral behavior and its spillover to an extended brand is contingent on consumers’ moral reasoning choices.

Keywords

Endorsement marketing Moral judgments Moral reasoning Transgression Sports marketing 

References

  1. Accenture Sponsorship Update (2009, December 13). Retrieved from http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=4915 [Last Accessed January 8, 2015].
  2. Badenhausen, K. (2013, June 5). Tiger Woods is back on top of the world’s highest-paid athletes. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2013/06/05/tiger-woods-is-back-on-top-of-the-worlds-highest-paid-athletes/ [Last Accessed September 10, 2014].
  3. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In J. R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 307–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ESPN News Services. (2009, December 14). Accenture cuts woods as sponsor. Retrieved from http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=4739219 [Last Accessed January 8, 2015].
  10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grappi, S., Romani, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2013). Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: moral emotions and virtues. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1814–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gwinner, K. P. (1997). Building brand image through event sponsorship: The role of image transfer. Journal of Advertising, 28, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haugh, D. (2011, November 12). In Happy Valley, unhappy focus on Paterno. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-11-12/sports/ct-spt-1113-haugh-penn-state-scandal–20111113_1_joe-paterno-son-jay-paterno-joepa [Last Accessed January 8, 2015].
  17. Hoffman, M. L. (1994). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. Reaching out: Caring, altruism, and prosocial behavior, 7, 161–194.Google Scholar
  18. Horrow, R., & Swatek, K. (2009, December 10). Who benefits from Tiger Woods’ scandal? Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/dec2009/bw20091210_272903.htm.
  19. Kalb, I. (2013, April 5). Why brands like Nike stuck with Tiger Woods through his scandal. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/tiger-woods-a-tale-of-two-images-2013-4 [Last Accessed January 8, 2015].
  20. Klayman, B. (2009, December 14). Nike chairman stands by Tiger Woods: report. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/14/us-golf-woods-nike-idUSTRE5BD2PV20091214 [Last Accessed January 8, 2015].
  21. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mittal, B. (1995). A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 663–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassenberg, A. M., & Johnson-Morgan, M. (2010). Scandals, sports and sponsors: What impact do sport celebrity transgressions have on consumer’s perceptions of the celebrity’s brand image and the brand image of their sponsors? In the 8th Annual Sport Marketing Association Conference (SMA 2010) Proceedings (pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
  26. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsang, J. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). Too good to be true!. The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wismer, D. (2013, March 31). Tiger Woods: ‘Winning takes care of everything’ Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidwismer/2013/03/31/tiger-woods-winning-takes-care-of-everything-and-other-quotes-of-the-week/ [Last Accessed October 28, 2014].
  30. Yi, Y. (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations