Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 136, Issue 3, pp 599–621 | Cite as

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Risk Management: A Case of R&D Investment

  • Shimin ChenEmail author
  • Xu Ni
  • Jamie Y. Tong


Increasing gender diversity in the boardroom has been promoted as a way to enhance corporate governance and risk management. This study empirically examines whether boards with more female directors play a role in reducing R&D risk. We first show that female directors help to reduce the positive relationship between R&D investment and future performance volatility. We then report that firms with more gender-diverse boards exhibit a lower adverse effect of R&D on the cost of debt. These results are robust to endogeneity analysis, alternative measures of gender diversity and risky investment, and other sensitivity tests. Overall, our results suggest that female directors improve board effectiveness in risk management with respect to R&D investment.


Female director Diversity R&D Risk management 



We gratefully acknowledge generous research support from China Europe International Business School. Jamie Y. Tong also would like to express appreciation for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (approval number: 71002058, 71202090, 71202091).


  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2004). Gender diversity in the boardroom, Finance working paper No. 58, European Corporate Governance Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arjoon, S. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barron, O. E., Byard, D., Kile, C., & Riedl, E. J. (2002). High-technology intangibles and analysts’ forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2), 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beltramini, R. F., Peterson, R. A., & Kozmetsky, G. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernardi, R. A., & Arnold, D. F, Sr. (1997). An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firm. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernardi, R. A., Arnold, D. F, Sr, Bean, D. F., & Weippert, K. M. (2002). Signaling gender diversity through annual report pictures: A research note on image management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(4), 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, risk, and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(2), 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investor and outside directors. Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bublitz, B., & Ettredge, M. (1989). The information in discretionary outlays: Advertising, research and development. The Accounting Review, 64(1), 108–124.Google Scholar
  16. Burton, C., & Ryall, C. (1995). Enterprising nation: Reviewing Australia’s managers to meet the challenges of the Asia-Pacific century: Managing for diversity. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Catalyst, (2003a). 2003 Catalyst census of women board directors of the Fortune 1000. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  20. Catalyst, (2003b). Catalyst census of women board directors in Canada. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  21. Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431–2456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (1998). Gender differences in information processing: An empirical test of the hypothesis confirming strategy in an audit context. Accounting and Finance, 38(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Bahavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ciftci, M., & Cready, W. M. (2011). Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cumming, D. J., Leung, T. Y. & Rui, O. M. (2012). Gender diversity and security fraud, Working paper, Schulich School of Business, York University.Google Scholar
  28. Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (1999). A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The implications of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doyle, E. M., Hughes, J. F., & Glaister, K. W. (2009). Linking ethics and risk management in taxation: Evidence from an exploratory study in Ireland and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drennan, L. T. (2004). Ethics, governance and risk management: Lessons from Mirror Group Newspapers and Barings Bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(3), 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eberhart, A. C., Maxwell, W. F., & Siddique, A. R. (2007). A reexamination of the tradeoff between the future benefit and riskiness of R&D. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Feldman, M. P., & Link, A. N. (2001). Chapter 1 A Preface to the Volume: Innovation policy in the Knowledge-based Economy. In M. P. Feldman & A. N. Link (Eds.), Innovation policy in the Knowledge-based Economy (pp. 1–2). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4), 552–564.Google Scholar
  39. Francis, R., & Armstrong, A. (2003). Ethics as a risk management strategy: The Australian experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Galbraith, S., & Stephenson, H. B. (1993). Decision rules used by male and female business students in making ethical value judgments: Another look. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(3), 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Guellec, D., & Potterie, B. V. P. D. l. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66(3), 353–378.Google Scholar
  44. Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Harris, J. R. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business, 64(5), 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A, Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jelinek, M., & Adler, N. J. (1988). Women: World-class managers for global competition. The Academy of Management Executive (19871989) 2(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  49. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones, T. M., & Gautschi, F. H. (1988). Will the ethics of business change? A survey of future executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(4), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jr, W. B. R., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klenke, K. (2003). Gender influences in decision-making processes in top management teams. Management Decision, 41(10), 1024–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kothari, S. P., Laguerre, T. E., & Leone, A. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(4), 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. KrackHardt, D., McCarthy, S., & Wittink, D. (1985). What makes it unethical? Determinants of ethical evaluation in business. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  55. Kristof, N. D. (2009). Mistresses of the universe. The New York Times, Feb 8.Google Scholar
  56. Kugihara, N. (1999). Gender and social loafing in Japan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 516–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lenney, E. (1977). Women’s self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2013). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, available online 13 November 2013.Google Scholar
  60. Lublin, J. S., & Francis, T. (2014). U.S. boards lag behind in appointing women. The Wall Street Journal, February 6.Google Scholar
  61. Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Martin, A. D., Nishikawa, T., & Williams, M. A. (2009). CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48(3), 23–40.Google Scholar
  63. Miesing, P., & Preble, J. F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(6), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. OECD. (2009). Corporate governance and the financial crisis: Key findings and main messages. Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  66. Pandit, S., Wasley, C. E., & Zach, T. (2011). The effect of R&D inputs and outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, 26(1), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peterson, R. A., Beltramini, R. F., & Kozmetsky, G. (1991). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics: A replication. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 733–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(6), 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ray, D. M. (2005). Corporate boards and corporate democracy. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shi, C. (2003). On the trade-off between the future benefits and riskiness of R&D: A bondholders’ perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–372.Google Scholar
  72. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Do female directors enhance corporate governance? Some evidence on earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Suisse, Credit. (2012). Gender diversity and corporate performance. Zurich: Credit Suisse.Google Scholar
  74. Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
  75. Trinidad, C., & Normore, A. H. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(7), 574–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber, J. (2006). Discussion of the effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weeks, W. A., Moore, C. W., McKinney, J. A., & Longenecker, J. G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Europe International Business SchoolShanghaiChina
  2. 2.University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations