Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 309–326 | Cite as

Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage

  • Pavel Castka
  • Charles J. Corbett
Article

Abstract

“Eco-labels” are an increasingly important form of private regulation for sustainability in areas such as carbon emissions, water consumption, ethical sourcing, or organic produce. The growing interest and popularity of eco-labels has also been coupled with growing concerns about their credibility, in part because the standard-setting and conformity assessment practices that eco-labels adopt exhibit striking differences. In this paper, we assess which assurance practices contribute to eco-labels being perceived as better governed, in the eyes of experts as well as the media. Unlike previous studies, which are mostly conceptual, qualitative, or focused on one or few eco-labels, we study a large set of eco-labels, combining data from three different sources. Our findings suggest that experts and media are primarily concerned about “re-assurance” practices, looking for one or preferably multiple layers of “re-assurance” that independent parties are overseeing the eco-label and the firms certified under it.

Keywords

Eco-labels Assurance Third party audit Governance Voluntary regulation Media coverage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the many experts who participated in this study, and to Anastasia O’Rourke (co-founder of Big Room Inc., the organization behind www.ecolabelindex.org), Olivier Peyrat (Director General of AFNOR, the Association Française de Normalisation), Dr. James Galloway (CEO, Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand), and Paddy Doherty and Kristin Komives at the ISEAL Alliance, as well as participants in several seminar and conference presentations on this work, for helpful discussions. (As usual, all opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors.) We also wish to thank Sasha Nichols for his assistance with the literature search. Most of all, we are deeply indebted to the team of UCLA Anderson MBA students (Class of 2011) who conducted the expert interviews, collected the expert survey responses, and coded the articles: Kuldip K. Ambastha, Soumya Gadde, Lawrence Herbert, Madhavi (Mia) Naik, and Ryan Perry. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Hansen, E. N. (2004). determining consumer preferences for ecolabeled forest products: An experimental approach. Journal of Forestry, 102(4), 28–32.Google Scholar
  3. Andon, P., & Free, C. (2012). Auditing and crisis management: The 2010 Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal. Accounting Organizations and Society, 37(3), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balineau, G., & Dufeu, I. (2010). Are fair trade goods credence goods? A new proposal, with french illustrations. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balzarova, M. A., & Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besiou, M., Hunter, M. L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). A web of watchdogs: Stakeholder media networks and agenda-setting in response to corporate initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 709–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bewley, K., & Li, Y. (2000). Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective, Vol. Iss: 1, pp. 201–226. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1(1), 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackman, A., & Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouslah, K., M’Zali, B., Turcotte, M.-F., & Kooli, M. (2010). The impact of forest certification on firm financial performance in Canada and the U.S. Journal Business Ethics, 96(4), 551–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Busch, L. (2011). The private governance of food: Equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar? Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. (2008a). Social responsibility standardization: Guidance or reinforcement through certification? Human systems management, 27(3), 231–242.Google Scholar
  15. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008b). The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility—an inside perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castka, P., & Corbett, C. J. (2014). Diffusion of environmental and social labeling schemes for sustainable products and services: The effect of stringency, governance, and media coverage. Working Paper. University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, W., & Tan, H.-T. (2013). Judgment effects of familiarity with an analyst’s name. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(3), 214–227.Google Scholar
  18. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conroy, M. E. (2007). Branded! How the certtification revolution is transforming global corporations. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darnall, N., & Kim, Y. (2012). Which types of environmental management systems are related to greater environmental improvements? Public Administration Review, 72(3), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2009). Perceived stakeholder unfluences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34, 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delmas, M., & Cuerel-Burbano, V. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delmas, M., Nairn-birch, N., & Balzarova, M. A. (2013). Choosing the right eco-label for your product. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(4), 10–12.Google Scholar
  26. Dhanda, K., & Hartman, L. (2011). The ethics of carbon neutrality: A critical examination of voluntary carbon offset providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dickson, M. A., & Eckman, M. (2008). Media portrayal of voluntary public reporting about corporate social responsibility performance: Does coverage encourage or discourage ethical management? Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dranove, D., & Jin, G. Z. (2010). Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4), 935–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Drolet, A. L., & Morrison, D. G. (2001). Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eccles, R. G. (2007). Reputation and its risks. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 104–114.Google Scholar
  31. Fransen, L. W., & Kolk, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5), 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Governance mechanisms to greening suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golden, J., Vermeer, D., Clemen, B., Michalko, A., Nguyen, D., Noyes, C., et al. (2010). An overview of ecolabels and sustainability certifications in the global marketplace. In J. Golden (Ed.), Corporate sustainability initiative. Durham: Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University.Google Scholar
  35. Graffin, S. D., & Ward, A. J. (2010). Certifications and reputation: Determining the standard of desirability amidst uncertainty. Organization Science, 21(2), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregoratti, C. (2011). Global nuts and local mangoes: a critical reading of the UNDP growing sustainable business initiative in Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F, Jr, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Harbaugh, R., Maxwell, J. W., & Roussillon, B. (2011). Label confusion: The Groucho effect of uncertain standards. Management Science, 57(9), 1512–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hartlieb, S., & Jones, B. (2009). Humanising business through ethical labelling: Progress and paradoxes in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henson, S. (2011). Private agrifood governance: conclusions, observations and provocations. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2012). ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a research agenda on management system standards. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Highhouse, S., Broadfoot, A., Yugo, J. E., & Devendorf, S. (2009). Examining corporate reputation jugdements with generalizability theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 782–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hodge, F. D. (2001). Hyperlinking unaudited information to audited financial statements: Effects on investor judgments. The Accounting Review, 76(4), 675–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ingenbleek, P., & Reinders, M. (2013). The development of a market for sustainable coffee in The Netherlands: Rethinking the contribution of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ISEAL. (2010a). Setting social and environmental standards (Vol. v5.0). London: The International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labeling Alliance.Google Scholar
  46. ISEAL. (2010b). A survey of thought leader views on sustainability standards 2010. London: The International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labeling Alliance.Google Scholar
  47. ISEAL. (2013). Principles for credible and effective sustainability standards systems. ISEAL credibility principles. London: ISEAL Alliance.Google Scholar
  48. ISO14024. (2001). Environmental labels and declarations—Type I environmental labelling—principles and procedures. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  49. Janis, I. L., & Fadner, R. (1965). The coefficient of imbalance. In H. Lasswell, N. Leites, et al. (Eds.), Language of politics (pp. 153–169). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Johansson, J., & Lidestav, G. (2011). Can voluntary standards regulate forestry?—Assessing the environmental impacts of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(3), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. Germany: WWF.Google Scholar
  53. Lamertz, K., & Baum, J. A. C. (1998). The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leire, C., & Thidell, A. (2005). Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases—A review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10–11), 1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. LexisNexis (2013). LexisNexis Group Global Content Catalogue. Retrieved 11 Nov 2013, http://w3.nexis.com/sources/scripts/info.pl?237924&GCC=true.
  56. Martinelli, A., & Midttun, A. (2010). Globalization and governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance, 10(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mercer, M. (2004). How do investors assess the credibility of management disclosures? Accounting Horizons, 18(3), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Mörth, U. (2004). Soft law in governance and regulation: an interdisciplinary analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Mueller, M., dos Santos, V. G., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parker, L. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.Google Scholar
  62. Partzsch, L. (2011). The legitimacy of biofuel certification. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pollock, T. G., Rindova, V. P., & Maggitti, P. G. (2008). Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the US IPO market. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Potts, J., Lynch, M., Wilkings, A., Huppé, G., Cunningham, M., & Voora, V. (2014). The state of sustainability initiatives review 2014. Standards and the green economy. In R. Ilnyckyj, D. Holmes & E. Rickert (Eds.). London: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).Google Scholar
  67. Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2007). Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: A club theory perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D., & Heller, A. (2007). Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: A comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agriculture and Human Values, 24(2), 147–163. doi: 10.1007/s10460-006-9047-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Richardson, A. J. (2009). Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34(5), 571–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schepers, D. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schuler, D. A., & Christmann, P. (2011). The effectiveness of market-based social governance schemes: The case of fair trade coffee. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Short, J. L., Toffel, M. W., & Hugill, A. R. (2013). What shapes the gatekeepers? Evidence from global supply chain auditors. Working paper, HBS.Google Scholar
  73. Silva-Castaneda, L. (2011). A forest of evidence: third-party certification and multiple forms of proof—a case study of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(2), 361–370.Google Scholar
  74. Simpson, D., Power, D., & Klassen, R. (2012). When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sønderskov, K. M., & Daugbjerg, C. (2011). The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tallontire, A., Opondo, M., Nelson, V., & Martin, A. (2011). Beyond the vertical? Using value chains and governance as a framework to analyse private standards initiatives in agri-food chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tamm Halström, K., & Boström, M. (2010). Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Terlaak, A. K. (2007). Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 968–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. TerraChoice. (2010). Seven sins of greenwashing. London: Terra Choice.Google Scholar
  81. Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic content analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Winters-Lynch, J. (1994). Determinants of effectiveness for environmental certification and labeling programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Marketing and EntrepreneurshipUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.UCLA Anderson School of ManagementLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations