Agle, B. R., & Mitchell, R. K. (2008). Introduction: Recent research and new questions. In Dialogue: Towards superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–159.
American Law Institute. (1994). Principles of corporate governance: Analysis and recommendations. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.
Anderson, E. (2000). Beyond homo economics: New developments in theories of social norms. Philosophy & Public Affairs,
Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review,
Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Corporate governance: What can we learn from public governance? Academy of Management Review,
Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers of trust. Harvard Law Review,
Berle, A. A. (1932). For whom are corporate mangers trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review,
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
Blume, M. E., & Keim, D. B. (2012). Institutional investors and market liquidity: Trends and relationships. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Boatright, J. R. (1994). Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly,
Bonnafous-Boucher, M. (2005). Some philosophical issues in corporate governance: The role of property in stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance,
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,
Chilosi, A., & Damiani, M. (2007). Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Governance,
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of Social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clark, R. (1985). Agency costs versus fiduciary duties. In J. W. Pratt & R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The Structure of business: 55–79. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Clark, W. H, Jr, & Babson, E. K. (2012). How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations. William Mitchell Law Review,
Cloninger, D. O. (1997). Share price maximization, asymmetric information, and ethical behavior: A comment. Financial Practice & Education,
Cohn, S. R. (1983). Demise of the director’s duty of care: Judicial avoidance of standards of sanctions through the business judgment rule. Texas Law Review,
Davis, G. F. (2008). A new finance capitalism? Mutual funds and ownership re-concentration in the United States. European Management Review,
Dobson, J. (1999). Is shareholder wealth maximization immoral? Financial Analysts Journal,
Dodd, M. E. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review,
Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Donaldson, T. (1989). The ethics of international business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review,
Economist. (2005). The union of concerned executives. The Economist, January 20. http://www.economist.com/node/3555194. Accessed 9 June 2013.
Economist. (2012). Fail! The Economist, November 20. http://www.economist.com/whichmba/fail/print. Accessed 29 April 2013.
Eisenberg, M. A. (2000). Corporations and other business organizations. New York: Foundation Press.
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. London: Prentice Hall.
Financial Times. (2009). Shareholder value re-evaluated. Editorial. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4229dcc4-11ca-11de-87b1-0000779fd2ac.html?siteedition=intl#axzz3IaEYhOyV.
Fisch, J. E. (2006). Measuring efficiency in corporate law: The role of shareholder primacy. The Journal of Corporation Law,
Floyd, L. A., Feng, X., Atkins, R., & Caldwell, C. (2013). Ethical outcomes and business ethics: Toward improving business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics,
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Harper Collins.
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Behavioral Economics,
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, M. (2001). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. London: Prentice Hall.
Galai, D., & Wiener, Z. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors. Journal of Corporate Finance,
Gapper, John. (2005). Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal’s “bad management theories are destroying good management practices”. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Gardiner, B. (2009). B-schools rethink curricula amid crisis. The Wall Street Journal Europe, 10.
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics,
Gentile, M. C. (2004). Corporate governance and accountability: What do we know and what do we teach future business leaders? Paper presented at the 3rd Colloquium of the European Academy of Business in Society (EABIS), Ghent, Belgium, 27–28 September 2014. The challenges of sustainable growth: Integrating societal expectations in business. New york: The Aspen Institute Business & Society Program.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Greenspan, A. (2009). We need a better cushion against risk. Financial Times.
Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Just how bad are our theories? A response to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Harvard Business Review. (2009). Are business schools to blame? Harvard Business Review, 106.
Heracleous, L. & Lan, L. L. (2010). The myth of shareholder capitalism. Harvard Business Review,
Hinkley, R. (2002). How corporate law inhibits social responsibility. The Humanist,
Holland, K. (2009). Is it time to retrain B-schools? The New York Times.
Ignatius, A. (2012). Captain planet. Harvard Business Review,
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly,
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,
Jones, T. M. (2010). The future of business ethics research: Reflections on the twentieth anniversary of Business Ethics Quarterly. Business Ethics Quarterly,
Kanter, R. M. (2005). What theories do audiences want? Exploring the demand side. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Khurana, R., & Nohria, N. (2008). It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review,
Kraakman, R. R., Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K. J., Kanda, H., et al. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management,
Marcoux, A. M. (2003). A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly,
Marens, R., & Wicks, A. (1999). Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly,
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,
McDonnell, B. H. (2004). Corporate constituency statutes and employee governance. William Mitchell Law Review,
McKinsey, (2006). Global survey of business executives: Business and society. McKinsey Quarterly,
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review,
Millon, D. (1991). Redefining corporate law. Indiana Law Review,
Mintzberg, H. (2005a). How inspiring. How sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal’s paper. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Mintzberg, H. (2005b). Managers not MBAs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Murray, S. (2013). MBA teaching urged to move away from focus on shareholder primacy model. Financial Times.
New Scientist. (2010). Editorial: Time for another green revolution; A fog of unreliable information and confusion is hampering efforts to weigh up eco-credibility. New Scientist, 3.
Nord, W. (2005). Treats and some treatments: Responses by Kanter, Pfeffer, Gapper, Hambrick, Mintzberg, and Donaldson to Ghoshal’s “bad management theories are destroying good management practices”. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Orts, E. W. (1992). Beyond shareholders: Interpreting corporate constituency statutes. George Washington Law Review,
Orts, E. W. (2013). Business persons: A legal theory of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (forthcoming).
Paine, L. S. (2006). The fiduciary relationship: A legal perspective. Note prepared for class discussion. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools: Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Phillips, R., Freeman, E. R., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly,
Pickering, M. A. (1968). Company as a separate legal entity. Modern Law Review,
Podolny, J. M. (2009). The buck stops (and starts) at business school. Harvard Business Review,
Polaris Institute. (2007). Coca-Cola Company wins corporate greenwashing award. Polaris Institute. http://www.polarisinstitute.org/coca_cola_company_wins_corporate_greenwashing_award. Accessed April 29 2013.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review,
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: Redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harvard Business Review,
Rock, E. (2012). Shareholder eugenics in the public corporation. Cornell Law Review,
Rönnegard, D. (2013). How autonomy alone debunks corporate moral agency. Business and Professional Ethics Journal,
Rose, J. M. (2007). Corporate directors and social responsibility: Ethics versus shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics,
Rose, N. L., & Wolfram, C. (2002). Regulating executive pay: Using the tax code to influence chief executive compensation. Journal of Labour Economics,
Rubin, R. R., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2013). Building a better MBA: From a decade of critique toward a decennium of creation. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Schrenk, L. P. (2006). Equity versus stakeholder and corporate governance: Developing a market for morality. The Business Renaissance Quarterly,
Skadden. (2011), Air products & chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc. Skadden Newsletter, February 16. http://www.skadden.com/newsletters/Air_Products_Chemicals_Inc_v_Airgas_Inc.pdf. Accessed May 14 2013.
Skapinker, M. (2009). Dangers in a world of disillusionment. Financial Times.
Smith, D. G. (1998). The shareholder primacy norm. The Journal of Corporation Law,
Smith, H. J. (2003). The shareholders versus stakeholders debate. Sloan Management Review,
Smith, N. C., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2010). How business schools lost their way. BusinessWeek, January 11. http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/jan2010/bs20100111_383186.htm. Accessed April 29 2013.
Social Investment Forum Foundation. (2010). Report on socially responsible investment trends in the United States. http://www.ussif.org/pubs. Accessed June 17 2013.
Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Swanson, D. L., & Frederick, W. C. (2003). Are business schools silent partners in corporate crime? Journal of Corporate Citizenship,
Testy, K. (2002). Linking progressive corporate law with progressive social movements. Tulane Law Review,
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics,
Vermaelen, T. (2009). Maximizing shareholder value: An ethical responsibility? In N. C. Smith & G. Lenssen (Eds.), Mainstreaming corporate responsibility. Chichester: Wiley.
Vermaelen, T. (2011). Putting a price tag on corporate social responsibility. CSR Wire, 9 March. http://csrwiretalkback.tumblr.com/post/3750265973/putting-a-price-tag-on-corporate-social-responsibility. Accessed April 29 2013.
Walsh, J. P. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science,
West, D. M. (2011). The purpose of corporations in business and law school curricula. Governance Studies at Brookings. http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2011/07/19-corporation-west.