The Influence of Board Diversity, Board Diversity Policies and Practices, and Board Inclusion Behaviors on Nonprofit Governance Practices
This study examines how and when nonprofit board performance is impacted by board diversity. Specifically, we investigate board diversity policies and practices as well as board inclusion behaviors as mediating mechanisms for the influence of age, gender, and racial/ethnic diversity of the board on effective board governance practices. The empirical analysis, using a sample of 1,456 nonprofit board chief executive officers, finds that board governance practices are directly influenced by the gender and racial diversity of the board and that board inclusion behaviors together with diversity policies and practices mediate the influence of the board’s gender and racial diversity on internal and external governance practices. Additionally, we found an interaction effect that indicates when boards have greater gender diversity, the negative impact of racial diversity on governance practices is mitigated. The findings suggest that board governance can be improved with more diverse membership, but only if the board behaves inclusively and there are policies and practices in place to allow the diverse members to have an impact.
KeywordsDiversity Diversity policies and practices Inclusion behavior Board effectiveness Nonprofit boards
The authors thank BoardSource for providing us with the data from the 2012 Governance Index Survey for Chief Executives and the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to improve the manuscript.
- Alliance for Board Diversity. (2013). Missing Pieces: Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards. Retrieved from http://theabd.org/2012_ABD%20Missing_Pieces_Final_8_15_13.pdf.
- Bernstein, R. S. & Davidson, D. (2012). Exploring the link between diversity, inclusive practices, and board performance: An analysis of the national BoardSource Nonprofit Governance Index. In Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Bilimoria, Diana. (2006). The relationship between Women Corporate Directors and Women Corporate Officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
- Blau, P. (1977). Heterogeneity and inequality: Towards a primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- BoardSource. (2012). BoardSource Nonprofit Governance Index. Retrieved from CEO Survey of Board Source Members: https://www.boardsource.org/eweb/Dynamicpage.aspx?webkey=8fac70bd-ea31-4c89-91bf-e3a7d3e705cc.
- Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2011). The inclusive nonprofit boardroom: Leveraging the transformative potential of diversity. Nonprofit Quarterly Spring, 15, 21–26.Google Scholar
- Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2012). Determinants of the range of ethnocultural diversity on nonprofit boards: A study of large Canadian Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/0899764012453085.
- Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1996). Women on boards on nonprofits: What difference do they make? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 6, 241–254.Google Scholar
- Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2010). The contextual impact of nonprofit board composition and structure on organizational performance: Agency and resource dependence perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chait, R. P., Holland, T. P., & Taylor, B. E. (1991). The effective board of trustees. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Churchill, J. G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research XVI, 64-73.Google Scholar
- Duca, D. J. (1996). Nonprofit boards: Roles, responsibilities, and performance. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ferreira, D. (2010). Board diversity”. In H. Baker & R. Anderson (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–241). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fredette, C., & Bradshaw, P. (2010). From diversity to inclusion: A multi-method examination of diverse governing groups. In Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F, Jr, Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Harrison, D. A., & Sin, H.-P. (2006). What is diversity and how should it be measured? In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 191–216). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Jackson, S. E., May, K. A., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team decision making effectiveness in organizations (pp. 204–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Janssens, M., & Zanoni, P. (2007). What makes an organization inclusive? Work context and diversity management practices favoring ethnic minorities’ inclusion’. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management conference, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- McGill, L., Bryan, B., & Miller, E. (2009). Benchmarking diversity: A first look at New York City foundations and nonprofits, Foundation Center.Google Scholar
- Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.Google Scholar
- Pavlou, P., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136.Google Scholar
- Treuhaft, S., Blackwell, A. G., & Pastor, M. (2011). America’s tomorrow: Equity is the superior growth model. Policy Link. Prepared with the University of Southern California’s Program for Environmental and Regional Equity.Google Scholar
- Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.Google Scholar