Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 105–125 | Cite as

Deepening Understanding of Certification Adoption and Non-Adoption of International-Supplier Ethical Standards

Article

Abstract

This study presents a theory of causally complex configurations of antecedent conditions influencing the adoption versus non-adoption of international supplier ethical certification-standards. Using objective measures of antecedents and outcomes, a large-scale study of exporting firms in the cut-flower industry in two South American countries (Colombia and Ecuador) supports the theory. The theory includes the following and additional propositions. No single (simple)-antecedent condition is sufficient for accurately predicting a high membership score in outcome conditions; the outcome conditions include a firm’s adoption or rejection of a product certification. No single (simple)-antecedent condition is necessary for accurately predicting high scores in the outcome condition. A few complex antecedent conditions (configurations) are sufficient but the occurrence of each is not necessary for accurately predicting high scores (e.g., adoption) in an outcome condition. Causal asymmetry of antecedent conditions indicating adoption versus non-adoption of specific ethical standards occurs—that is, causal conditions leading to rejection are not the mirror opposites of causal conditions leading to adoption.

Keywords

Adoption Asymmetry Causal recipe Complex antecedent conditions Equifinality Ethical standards Product certification 

References

  1. AIPH. (2009). International statistics flowers and plants. International Association of Horticultural Producers, 57. Hannover: Institut fur Entwicklungs und Agrarokonomik.Google Scholar
  2. Asolflores. (2008). Floricultura Colombiana: Estadísticas 2007. Bogotá: Asocolflores.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1150–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackman, A., & Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-level benefits of sustainability certifications. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cashore, B. W., Auld, A. G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2007). Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. Research-Technology Management. Retrieved December 10, 2009 from (http://www.proddev.com/downloads/working_papers/wp_6.pdf).
  11. Corbett, C. J. (2006). Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. M&Som-Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 8(4), 330–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbett, C. J., Montes-Sancho, M. J., & Kirsch, D. A. (2005). The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 51, 1046–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2005). Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delmas, M. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2008). The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: Responsible care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 230–251.Google Scholar
  17. Durand, R., & McGuire, J. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26, 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Expoflores (2010). http://www.expoflores.com. Accessed Oct 2010.
  19. Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theoies: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.Google Scholar
  23. Gladwell, M. (2010). Amazon exclusive: Malcolm Gladwell reviews the checklist manifesto. Retrieved, from http://www.amazon.com/Checklist-Manifesto-How-Things-Right/dp/0805091742/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1362928191&sr=1-1&keywords=Checklist+Manifesto.
  24. Guler, I., Guillen, M., & MacPherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hira, A., & Ferrie, J. (2006). Fair trade: Three key challenges for reaching the mainstream. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howard, J. A., & Morgenroth, W. M. (1968). Information processing model of executive decision. Management Science, 14, 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu, S.-H., Woodside, A.G., & Marshall, R. (2013). Critical tests of multiple theories of cultures’ consequences: Comparing the usefulness of models by Hofstede, Ingelhart and Baker, Schwartz, Steenkamp as well as GDP and distance for explaining overseas tourism behavior. Journal of Travel Research, forthcoming; published online version at http://jtr.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/07/oo47287512475218.
  28. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Khanna, M. (2001). Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 291–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Barnett, M. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 Management Standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, A., Prado, A., & Rivera, J. (2011) “Industry self-regulation and environmental protection.” In A.J. Hoffman, A. and P. Bansal (pp. 640-655), The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Environment Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved, from http://faculty.tuck.dartmouth.edu/images/uploads/faculty/andrew-king/CH_6_King_Prado_Rivera_FINAL_DRAFT_15_12_2010.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2011.
  33. King, A. A., & Toffel, M. (2007). Self-regulatory institutions for solving environmental problems: Perspectives and contributions from the management literature. In M. Delmas & O. Young (Eds.), Governing the environment: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyon, T. L., & Maxwell, J. W. (2002). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. In M. Franzini & A. Nicita (Eds.), Economic institutions and environmental policy: Past, present and future. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations of meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9, 331–3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Montgomery, D. B. (1975). New product distribution: an analysis of supermarket buyer decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montiel, I., & Husted, B. (2009). The adoption of certified environmental management programs in Mexico: First movers as institutional entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naveh, E., & Marcus, A. A. (2004). When does the ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 81, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prado, A. (2012). Choosing among competing environmental and labor standards: An exploratory analysis of producer adoption. Working paper. New York: Stern School, New York University (aprado@stern.nyu.edu).Google Scholar
  44. Ragin, C. (2006). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research, 16(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
  45. Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rees, J. (1997). Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy, 19, 477–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 789–812.Google Scholar
  48. Reinhardt, F. L. (2000). Down to earth: Applying business principles to environmental management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rice, R. A. (2001). Noble goals and challenging terrain: Organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global marketplace. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(1), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riisgaard, L. (2008). Global value chains, labor organization and private social standards: Lessons from East African Cut Flower Industries. World Development, 37, 326–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rivera, J. (2002). Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35(4), 333–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivera, J., & DeLeon, P. (2004). Is greener whiter? Voluntary environmental performance of Western Ski areas. Policy Studies Journal, 32(2–3), 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specific? understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sasser, E. N., Prakash, A., Cashore, B., & Auld, G. (2006). Direct targeting as an NGO political strategy: Examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector. Business and Politics, 8(3), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007). From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18(4), 578–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010a). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010b). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Terlaak, A., & King, A. A. (2006). The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(4), 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Wocjik, J. (2011). There’s blood on those valentine’s day roses. People’s World. Retrieved February 11, from http://www.peoplesworld.org/there-s-blood-on-those-valentine-s-day-roses/.
  61. Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms. Journal of Business Research, 66, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. WRI 2010, Global Ecolabel Monitor: Towards transparency. (2010). World Resource Institute (WRI), Retrieved December, 15 2010 from http://www.wri.org/publication/global-ecolabel-monitor.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INCAE Business SchoolAlajuelaCosta Rica
  2. 2.Department of MarketingBoston College, Carroll School of ManagementChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations