Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 131, Issue 3, pp 665–680 | Cite as

Pivoting the Role of Government in the Business and Society Interface: A Stakeholder Perspective

  • Nicolas M. Dahan
  • Jonathan P. Doh
  • Jonathan D. RaelinEmail author


The growing popularization of stakeholder theory among management scholars has offered a useful framework for understanding the multiple and interdependent roles of government and business in an increasingly challenging political and regulatory environment. Despite this trend, attention to the role and responsibility of government to protect citizen rights has been limited. To the two traditional stakeholder theory views of government where the focal organization remains the firm, we propose to add two views by pivoting the government’s place and making it the focal organization. We thus describe governments as serving four roles in the business–government–society nexus (namely, “framework,” “business partner,” “interfering,” and “advocate”). For each role, we analyze typical governmental activities/behaviors, relationships with firms’ stakeholders, as well as the challenges and limits to these roles. We also focus on the central notion of salience amplification, as a means of checks and balances across stakeholders in order to safeguard citizen rights and reveal the greater good.


Stakeholder theory Government Citizens Salience 



Nicolas Dahan would like to sincerely thank his friend and colleague Professor Bernard Leca (Dauphine) for earlier conversations on this article’s topic that framed this contribution.


  1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Vadera, A. K. (2008). The dark side of authority: Antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Hardcastle, C. (2003). Public–private partnerships: Managing risks and opportunities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alderman, L. (2013, February 20). Quel brouhaha! A diatribe on unions irks the French. New York Times.Google Scholar
  5. Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashman, D. (2001). Civil society collaboration with business: Bringing empowerment back in. World Development, 29(7), 1097–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barley, S. R. (2007). Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop, J. D. (2012). The limits of corporate human rights obligations and the rights of for-profit corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boddewyn, J., & Brewer, T. (1994). International business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 119–143.Google Scholar
  10. Bonardi, J.-P. (1999). Market and nonmarket strategies during deregulation: The case of British telecom. Business and Politics, 1(2), 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and public policy: How governments matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cocks, G., Mueller, J., & Ingley, C. (in press). The financial crisis, investor activists and corporate strategy. Journal of Management and Governance.Google Scholar
  13. Coy, P., Parkin, B., & Martin, A. (2014, March 20). In trade talks, it’s countries vs. companies. Businessweek.Google Scholar
  14. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation, and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cutler, A. C. (2003). Private power and global authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. (2006). The role of multinational corporations in transnational institutional building: A policy-network perspective. Human Relations, 59(11), 1571–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahan, N. M., & Gittens, M. (2010). Business and the public affairs of slavery: A discursive approach of an ethical public issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
  21. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  22. Drayton, B., & Budinich, V. (2010). A new alliance for global change. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 56–64.Google Scholar
  23. Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbor. Business and Society, 40(4), 442–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunfee, T. W. (1998). The marketplace of morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eggers, W. D., & Macmillan, P. (2013). The solution revolution: How business, government, and social enterprises are teaming up to solve society’s toughest problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fagre, N., & Wells, L. T. (1982). Bargaining power of multinationals and host governments. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(2), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fassin, Y. (2012). Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forero, J. (2005, July 1). Report criticizes labor standards in Central America. New York Times.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. Boston: Pitman/Ballinger.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, J. (2003). Extending public law norms through privatization. Harvard Law Review, 116(5), 1285–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Freeman, R. E. (2008). Ending the so-called “Friedman–Freeman” debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 162–166.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  35. Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Getz, K. A. (1997). Research in corporate political action: Integration and assessment. Business and Society, 36(1), 32–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haley, U. C. V., & Schuler, D. A. (2011). Government policy and firm strategy in the solar photovoltaic industry. California Management Review, 54(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamilton, J. B, I. I. I., & Berken, E. J. (2005). Exxon at grand bois, Louisiana. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haynes, W. (2002). Transportation at the millennium. Review of Policy Research, 19(1), 62–89.Google Scholar
  42. Heath, J. (2006). Business ethics without stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill, J. G. (2010). The rising tension between shareholder and director power in the common law world. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hillman, A., Keim, G., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837–857.Google Scholar
  47. Hyman, M. R., & Curran, C. M. (2000). The volitionist’s manifesto. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnston, J. M., & Romzek, B. S. (1999). Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform. Public Administration Review, 59(5), 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Joskow, P., & Schlamensee, R. (1988). Markets for power: An analysis of electrical utility deregulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63–76.Google Scholar
  51. Khatri, N., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kolb, R. W. (2010). Lessons from the financial crisis: Causes, consequences, and our economic future. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lawton, T., Doh, J. P., & Rajwani, T. (2014). Aligning for advantage: Competitive strategies for the political and social arenas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawton, T., McGuire, S., & Rajwani, T. (2013). Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lehne, R. (1993). Industry and politics: United States in comparative perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. (1994). The state as strategist in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 513–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levy, D. L., & Prakash, A. (2003). Bargains old and new: Multinational corporations in global governance. Business and Politics, 5(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lopez, J. A. P., & Santos, J. M. S. (in press). Does corruption have social roots: The role of culture and social capital. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  59. Lux, S., Crook, T., & Woehr, D. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2004). Astroturf: Interest group lobbying and corporate strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13, 561–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mahon, J. F. (1993). Shaping issues/manufacturing agents: Corporate political sculpting. In B. M. Mitnick (Ed.), Corporate political agency (pp. 187–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venture, 24(5), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGraw, T. (1984a). Regulation in America: A historical overview. California Management Review, 27(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McGraw, T. (1984b). Business and government: The origins of the adversary relationship. California Management Review, 27(2), 32–52.Google Scholar
  66. Medema, S. G. (2003). The economic role of government in the history of economic thought. In J. Biddle, J. B. Davis, & W. J. Samuels (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 428–444). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mitchell, N. J. (1997). The conspicuous corporation: Business, public policy and representative democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. K. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  69. Mitnick, B. (1981). The strategic uses of regulation and deregulation. Business Horizons, 24, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Néron, P. Y. (2010). Business and the polis: What does it mean to see corporations as political actors? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. OECD. (2012). China in focus: Lessons and challenges. Retrieved from
  73. Orr, G. (2011, December 21). Everyone loses in a US vs. China trade war. Retrieved from
  74. Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Toole, J. (2013, July 1). GAO: U.S. corporations pay average effective tax rate of 12.6 %. CNN Money. Retrieved from
  76. Porter, M. E., & Rivkin, J. W. (2012). The looming challenge to US competiveness. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 54–62.Google Scholar
  77. Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 5(2), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rawls, J. (2013). The justification of civil disobedience. In A. Kavanagh & J. Oberdiek (Eds.), Arguing about law (pp. 244–253). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Reich, R. B. (2009). Government in your business. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 94–99.Google Scholar
  80. Rivera, J. E. (2010). Business and public policy: Responses to environmental and social protection processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.Google Scholar
  83. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor a new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business and Society, 53(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Selsky, J., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shaffer, B. (1995). Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21(3), 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tulpulé, V., Brown, S., Lim, J., Polidano, C., Pant, H., & Fisher, B. S. (1998). An economic assessment of the Kyoto Protocol using the Global Trade and Environment Model. Retrieved from
  90. Verkuil, P. R. (2007). Outsourcing sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vernon, R. (1976). Multinational enterprises and national governments: Exploration of an uneasy relationship. Columbia Journal of World Business, 9–16.Google Scholar
  92. Vietor, R. H. K., & Weinzierl, M. (2012). Macroeconomic policy and US competiveness. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 112–115.Google Scholar
  93. Waddock, S. (2002). Leading corporate citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  94. Wald, M. L. (2011, December 2). Panel says Chinese imports hurt U.S. solar firms. New York Times.Google Scholar
  95. Wilson, G. K. (2003). Business & politics: A comparative introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  96. Wong, M. H., Wu, S. C., Deng, W. J., Yu, X. Z., Luoa, Q., Leung, A. O. W., et al. (2007). Export of toxic chemicals—A review of the case of uncontrolled electronic-waste recycling. Environmental Pollution, 149(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yamak, S., & Süer, Ö. (2005). State as a stakeholder. Corporate Governance, 5(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Young, H. (2009, November 3). Astroturf lobbying organizations: Do fake grass-roots need real regulation. Illinois Business Law Journal. Posting, retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas M. Dahan
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. Doh
    • 2
  • Jonathan D. Raelin
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Fox School of BusinessTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Villanova University School of BusinessVillanovaUSA
  3. 3.School of BusinessThe George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations