Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 601–618 | Cite as

Mainstreaming and its Discontents: Fair Trade, Socially Responsible Investing, and Industry Trajectories

Article

Abstract

Over time, according to popular and academic accounts, alternative trade initiatives [such as fair trade, organics, forest certification, and socially responsible investing (SRI)] almost invariably lose their oppositional stance and go mainstream. That is, they lose their alternative, usually peripheral, and often contrarian character. In this paper, I argue that this is not always the case and that the path to going mainstream is not always an unproblematic one. I observe that while scholars have documented various aspects of specific alternative trade initiatives, little comparative work has been done to theorize their different trajectories. To advance the scholarship, I compare two alternative trade movements, fair trade and SRI, and develop three hypotheses—the relation motivations hypothesis, the material interests hypothesis, and the organization of credibility hypothesis—that explain why going mainstream has been so hotly contested in the fair trade movement but not the SRI movement. I articulate these hypotheses and evaluate their merits.

Keywords

Fair trade Socially responsible investing Alternative trade Social enterprise Mainstreaming 

References

  1. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2011). Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2001). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buck, D., Getz, C., & Guthman, J. (1997). From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis, 37, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. (2001). Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation. Agriculture and Human Values, 18, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Child, C. (2012). Chasing the double-bottom line: Fair trade and the elusive win-win. In B. Gidron & H. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Child, C. (forthcoming). Bulwarks against market pressures: Value rationality in the for-profit pursuit of social value. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1994). A rational choice perspective on economic sociology. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, R. (1986). Max Weber: A skeleton key. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Cooperative Coffees. (n.d.) “History.” Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.coopcoffees.com/who/about-cc/history-of-cc.
  12. Counsell, S., & Terje, K. (2002). Trading in credibility: The myth and reality of the Forest Stewardship Council. The Rainforest Foundation. Retrieved June 24, 2013, from http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/files/TradinginCredibilityfullreport.pdf.
  13. Davis, G. F., & Zald, M. N. (2005). Social change, social theory, and the convergence of movements and organizations. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Doherty, B., Davies, I. A., & Tranchell, S. (2013). Where now for fair trade? Business History, 55, 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Domini, A. L. (1992). What is social investing? Who are social investors? In P. D. Kinder, S. D. Lydenberg, & A. L. Domini (Eds.), The social investment almanac: A comprehensive guide to socially responsible investing. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Domini, A. L., & Kinder, P. D. (1984). Ethical investing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Drimmelen, R. (2000). The flight of the Bumblebee: 25 years of Oikocredit. The Ecumenical Review, 52, 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Equal Exchange. (2010). Institute for marketecology to certify select fair trade products for Equal Exchange. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.equalexchange.coop/institute-for-marketecology-to-certify-select-fair-trade-products-for-equal-exchange.
  22. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fair Trade Original. (n.d.) History. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://fairtrade.nl/EN/MainExtendedContent/About-Fair-Trade-Original/History.aspx.
  24. Fairtrade Labeling Organizations International. (2010). Growing stronger together: Annual report 20092010. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from http://www.fairtrade.net.
  25. Fridell, G. (2007). Fair trade coffee: The prospects and pitfalls of market-driven social justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  26. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Glickman, L. B. (2004). Buy for the sake of the slave: Abolitionism and the origins of American consumer activism. American Quarterly, 56, 889–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1998). Rational action theory for sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 49, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodman, D. (2008). The international coffee crisis: A review of the issues. In C. Bacon, V. E. Mendez, S. R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, & J. A. Fox (Eds.), Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1996). The nature of rational choice theory. In D. P. Green & I. Shapiro (Eds.), Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Guthman, J. (1998). Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture. Antipode, 30, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haveman, H. A. (2009). The Columbia school and the study of bureaucracies: Why organizations have lives of their own. In P. Adler (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sociology and organization studies: Classical foundations (pp. 585–606). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Heard, J. E. (1992). Fiduciary Duty and Institutional Shareholder Activism. In P. D. Kinder, S. D. Lydenberg, & A. L. Domini (Eds.), The social investment almanac: A comprehensive guide to socially responsible investing. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  35. Heimer, C. A. (2008). Thinking about how to avoid thought: Deep norms, shallow rules, and the structure of attention. Regulation & Governance, 2, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaffee, D. (2007). Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jaffee, D. (2010). Fair trade standards, corporate participation, and social movement responses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaffee, D. (2012). Weak coffee: Certification and co-optation in the fair trade movement. Social Problems, 59, 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaffee, D., & Howard, P. H. (2009). Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kinder, P. D. (2005a). Socially responsible investing: An evolving concept in a changing world. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://stage.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/document/CustomO16C45F65148.pdf.
  41. Kinder, P. D. (2005b). Values-based and value investing: The coming confluence. Retrieved May 16, 2011, from http://thebell.us/2011/05/values-based-value-investing-the-coming-confluence/.
  42. Kinder, P. D. (2011). Values-based and value investing: The coming confluence. Retrieved May 16, 2011, http://thebell.us/2011/05/values-based-value-investing-the-coming-confluence/.
  43. Kinder, P., Lydenberg, S. D., & Domini, A. L. (1993). Investing for good: Making money while being socially responsible. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  44. Klooster, D. (2006). Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: The political ecology of a nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lareau, A. (2012). Using the terms hypothesis and variable for qualitative work: A critical reflection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 671–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2006). Mainstreaming fair trade: Adoption, assimilation, appropriation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luker, K. (2008). Salsa dancing into the social sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lydenberg, S. D. (2005). Corporations and the public interest: Guiding the invisible hand. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  50. March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  52. Meehan, P. (2007). To Burundi and Beyond for Coffee’s Holy Grail. In The New York Times (pp. 8-8). New York: Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr.Google Scholar
  53. Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18, 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Moore, G. (2004). The fair trade movement: Parameters, issues and future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mutersbaugh, T. (2005). Just-in-space: Certified rural products, labor of quality, and regulatory spaces. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: the interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 70–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pax World Mutual Funds. (n.d.) Pax history. Retrieved June 18, 2011, from http://www.paxworld.com/about/welcome-from-the-president/pax-history/.
  59. Raynolds, L. T. (2000). Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values, 17, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raynolds, L. T. (2009). Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: From partnership to traceability. World Development, 37, 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D. L., & Wilkinson, J. (2007). Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Reed, D. (2009). What do corporations have to do with fair trade? Positive and normative analysis from a value chain perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reed, D., Thomson, B., Hussey, I., & LeMay, J.-F. (2010). Developing a normatively grounded research agenda for fair trade: Examining the case of Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Renard, M. C. (2003). Fair trade: Quality, market and conventions. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richardson, B. J. (2008). Socially responsible investment law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richardson, B. J. (2009). Keeping ethical investment ethical: Regulatory issues for investing for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Richardson, B. J., & Cragg, W. (2010). Being virtuous and prosperous: SRI’s conflicting goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robinson, P. (2011a). The slow trade movement: Fair trade is not for sale! Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://smallfarmersbigchange.coop/2011/02/10/the-slow-trade-movement-fair-trade-is-not-for-sale/.
  69. Robinson, P. (2011b). To tell the truth: Who owns fair trade? Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://smallfarmersbigchange.coop//02/01/to-tell-the-truth-who-owns-fair-trade-2/.
  70. Rogers, T. (2004). Small coffee brewers try to redefine fair trade. In T. Christian (Ed.), The Christian Science Monitor. Boston, MA: The First Church of Christ, Scientist.Google Scholar
  71. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2008). In the Matter of Pax World Management Corp., Respondent. Retrieved September 7, 2010, from http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2008/ia-2761.pdf.
  73. Silbey, S., Huising, R., & Coslovsky, S. V. (2009). The “sociological citizen”: Relational interdependence in law and organizations. L’Année Sociologique, 59, 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sparkes, R. (2002). Socially responsible investment: A global revolution. Padstow: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Swedberg, R. (2005). The Max Weber Dictionary: Key words and central concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Paul Wazzan, C. (1999). The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott. Journal of Business, 72, 35–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vogel, D. (1978). Lobbying the corporation: Citizen challenges to business authority. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  81. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  82. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  83. Weissman, M. (2008). God in a cup: The obsessive quest for the perfect coffee. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Wilkinson, J. (2007). Fair trade: Dynamic and dilemmas of a market oriented global social movement. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations