The United Nations Global Compact: An Institutionalist Perspective
- 1.8k Downloads
The United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) has generated a lively debate among academics, activists, and policy practitioners. Given the scope and ambition of this program, and the prestige of the United Nations associated with it, its supporters believe it will fundamentally reshape how businesses practice corporate social responsibility (CSR). Its critics view it as a flawed program because it does not impose verifiable obligations and does not compel its participants to adhere to their program obligations. We present an approach to study CSR programs grounded in rational-choice institutionalist theory, building on previous work viewing CSR programs as clubs which can produce reputational benefits for members as well as positive societal externalities, provided that they incorporate institutional mechanisms to prevent member shirking. This perspective puts the focus squarely on the institutional rules of the UNGC and their impacts on member behavior. While we conclude that the UNGC has not yet demonstrated a capacity to generate across-the-board improvements in CSR performance beyond what member firms would have done otherwise, we are hopeful that its sponsors and leaders can undertake worthwhile changes in program design to align member incentives with program objectives.
KeywordsUnited Nations Global Compact CSR clubs Institutional design Monitoring and enforcement
- Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2015). “Bluewashing” the firm?: Voluntary regulations, program design and member compliance with the United Nations global compact. Policy Studies Journal, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Coglianese, C., & Nash, J. (Eds.). (2001). Regulating from the inside: Can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1970). Social responsibility of business. The New York Times Magazine, 33, 122–126.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, A. J. (1997). From heresy to dogma. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
- Joint Civil Society Statement on the Global Compact and Corporate Accountability. (2004). http://www.earthrights.org/campaigns/joint-civil-society-statement-global-compact-and-corporate-accountability.
- March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
- Mwangi, W., Rieth, L. & Schmitz, H.P. (2013). Encouraging greater compliance: local networks and the United Nations global compact. In T. Risse, S. Ropp, & S. Sikkink (Eds.), The Persistent Power of Human Rights from Commitment to Compliance (pp. 203–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ruggie, J. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 52 (autumn).Google Scholar
- Ruggie, J. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving international agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840.Google Scholar
- Ruggie J., & Kell G. (1999). Global markets and social legitimacy: The case of the Global Compact. Transnational Corporations, 8:101–120.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sethi, S. P., & Schepers, D. (2013). United Nations global compact: The promise–performance gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 1−16 .Google Scholar
- SwissInfo. (2007). UN challenged over business ethics. http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/foreign_affairs/UN_challenged_over_business_ethics.html?cid=17536. Retrieved 5 July 2007.
- UN Global Compact. (2009). United Nations global compact annual review 2008. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/9.1_news_archives/2009_04_08/GC_2008AR_FINAL.pdf.
- Vidovic, M., Khanna, N., & Delgado, M. (2013). Third party certification and the effectiveness of voluntary pollution abatement programs: Evidence from responsible care. Agricultural and applied economics association 2013 annual meeting, August 4–6, 2013, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.Google Scholar