Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appointing Women to Boards: Is There a Cultural Bias?

Journal of Business Ethics volume 129, pages 429–444 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Companies that are serious about corporate governance and business ethics are turning their attention to gender diversity at the most senior levels of business (Institute of Business Ethics, Business Ethics Briefing 21:1, 2011). Board gender diversity has been the subject of several studies carried out by international organizations such as Catalyst (Increasing gender diversity on boards: Current index of formal approaches, 2012), the World Economic Forum (Hausmann et al., The global gender gap report, 2010), and the European Board Diversity Analysis (Is it getting easier to find women on European boards? 2010). They all lead to reports confirming the overall relatively low proportion of women on boards and the slow pace at which more women are being appointed. Furthermore, the proportion of women on corporate boards varies much across countries. Based on institutional theory, this study hypothesizes and tests whether this variation can be attributed to differences in cultural settings across countries. Our analysis of the representation of women on boards for 32 countries during 2010 reveals that two cultural characteristics are indeed associated with the observed differences. We use the cultural dimensions proposed by Hofstede (Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, 1980) to measure this construct. Results show that countries which have the greatest tolerance for inequalities in the distribution of power and those that tend to value the role of men generally exhibit lower representations of women on boards.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. Several other prominent organizations confirm the imbalance of women on boards worldwide and the wide variation between countries. The Corporate Gender Gap Report of 2010, published by the World Economic Forum, presents the results of a survey of more than 3,400 companies including the 100 largest employers in each of the 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), together with Brazil, Russia, and China. The 2010 European Board Diversity Analysis, prepared by Egon Zehnder International, analyzes data on 340 of the largest companies (market capitalization of more than EUR 4 billion) across 17 European countries. The report of Lord Davies of Abersosch, published on February 24, 2011 and commissioned by the United Kingdom government, examines the current situation of the FSTE 350 boards and gives its conclusion after wide consultation with various interested parties.

  2. BoardEx is a business intelligence service providing data concerning the board of directors and senior management of public and large private companies. It is mainly used by institutional investors, wealth managers, and consultants but more and more as a source for academic research. The BoardEx database holds in-depth profiles of over 500,000 of the world's business leaders. BoardEx was established originally in 2001 by Management Diagnostics Ltd in the UK and has since grown to North America and Asia.

  3. We used the same sample except for Belgium and Luxemburg which were removed because the GLOBE study did not cover these countries.

References

  • Adler, R. D. (2001). Women in the executive suite correlate to high profits. Working paper. Conference Equal Pay is value adding. ECWT. European Center for women and Technology. Copenhagen.

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, R. (1995). Diversity in executive networks: A national study of women’s representation in private sector economic development. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(3), 306–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2013). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Journal of Management, 24, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Hallock, K. F. (2001). The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billing, Y. D., & Alvesson, M. (1989). Four ways of looking at women and leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B. (2001). Women building presence in non-traditional fields. Business Woman, 15, 11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors. A needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(9), 909–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(5), 396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst, (2001). Catalyst census of women board directors. New York: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. www.Catalystwomen.org.

  • Catalyst. (2005–2008). Catalyst census of women board directors of the Fortune 500. www.Catalystwomen.org.

  • Catalyst. (2011–2012). Increasing gender diversity on boards: Current index of formal approaches. Catalyst, New York.

  • Clark, R., & Carvalho, J. (1996). Female revolt revisited. International Review of Modern Sociology, 26, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1595–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies. (2011). UK Corporate Governance Code. Financial Reporting Council.

  • Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Board Diversity Analysis. (2010). Is it getting easier to find women on European boards? Egon Zehnder International. London. www.egonzehnder.com.

  • Financial Reporting Council. (2011). UK Corporate Governance Code. Financial Reporting Council. London. www.frc.org.uk.

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1990). Bringing society back in symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Di Maggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organization analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. ABACUS, 24, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Social Science Research Network. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5505.

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1981). Numbers and positions of women elected to corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21, 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2010). The global gender gap report 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick & Struggles. (1977). The changing board profile of the board of directors. Chicago, IL: Heidrick & Struggles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D. J., & Pugh, D. S. (1995). Management worldwide: The impact of societal culture on organizations around the globe. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2000). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, O.-K. (2003). Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts’ forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 235–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., & Dickson, M. W. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in global leadership (pp. 171–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleharts, R. (1977). The silent revolution changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Pricenton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleharts, R. (2001). Modernización y posmodernización: El cambio cultural, económico y político en 43 sociedades. Madrid: CIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Business Ethics. (2011, September). Business Ethics and Board Diversity. Business Ethics Briefing, 21:1.

  • Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., & Corrigal, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., & Erkut, S. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley Centers for Women, Report No. WCW 11. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.

  • Labelle, R., Francoeur, C., & Makni Gargouri, R. (2010). Ethics, diversity management and financial reporting quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Harrison, J. R. (2008). National culture and the composition and leadership structure of boards of directors. Corporate Governance, 16(5), 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Lane, P. J., Collin, S. O., & Very, P. (2005). Origins of corporate governance in the USA, Sweden and France. Organization Studies, 26(6), 867–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Lane, P. J., Collin, S. O., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick Hyland, M. A., & Marcellino, P. A. (2002). Examining gender on corporate boards: A regional study. Corporate Governance, 2, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (2000). A start-up of her own. US News and World Report, 128(19), 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations; formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 364–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Shackman, G. (1996). Gender and authority: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., & Levesque, L. L. (2007). The status of women in corporate governance in high-growth, high-potential firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, S., & Majka, L. (1983). The economic integration of women: A cross-national investigation. Work and Occupations: An International Sociological Journal, 10, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palvia, A., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2012). Do female CEOs and chairs constrain bank risk-taking? Evidence from the Financial Crisis. Working Paper in 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference 2012. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2136978.

  • Paxton, P. (1997). Women in national legislatures: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 26, 442–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (1997). European patterns of corporate ownership: A twelve-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 759–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Cheung, F. M., & Terpstra, R. H. (1993). Differences in managerial values: A study of US, Hong Kong and PRC managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. (2004). Comportamiento organizacional. Mexico City: Pearson Education de Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, S. B., & Niswander, F. (1995). Cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally: A test of Gray’s (1988) theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, W., & Boivie, S. (2004). Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R. S., & Rogovsky, N. (1998). Understanding compensation practice variation across firms: The impact of national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1986). Beyond the first generation of women directors: on the other side of the roadblock. Directors and Boards, 11(1), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealy, R., Doldor, E., & Vinnicombe, S. (2009a). Increasing diversity on public and private sector boards. Part 1: How diverse are boards and why? Cranfield School of Management Report commissioned by the UK Government Equalities Office, October pp. 64.

  • Sealy, R., Doldor, E., & Vinnicombe, S. (2009b). Increasing diversity on public and private sector boards. Part 2: What is being done to improve diversity on boards and how effective is this? Cranfield School of Management Report commissioned by the UK Government Equalities Office, November pp. 64.

  • Semenov, R. (2000). Cross-country differences in economic governance: Culture as a major explanatory factor. Center dissertation, Tilburg.

  • Smith, E. (2007). Gender influence on firm-level entrepreneurship through the power structure of boards. Women in Management Review, 22(3), 168–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spain Equality Law. Ley Orgánica de Igualdad (2007). Ley Organica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres. BOE no 71 de 23/3/2007.

  • Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Organizational structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, M., & Au Yong, H. H. (2012). The Token Woman. Working Paper in 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference 2012, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2136737.

  • Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (2003). Culture, openness and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Very, P., Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., & Veiga, J. (1997). Relative standing and the performance of recently acquired European Firms. Strategic Management Journal., 18(8), 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelechoski, D., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Characteristic of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 12(3), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The second and third authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 410-03-1046), the Institute for Governance in Public and Private Organizations and, respectively, the CGA Professorship in Strategic Financial Information and the Stephen A. Jarislowsky Chair in Governance. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

    Amalia Carrasco & Joaquina Laffarga

  2. HEC Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Claude Francoeur & Réal Labelle

  3. University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

    Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo

Authors
  1. Amalia Carrasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claude Francoeur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Réal Labelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joaquina Laffarga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Francoeur.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8.

Table 7 Scores of cultural dimensions by country Hofstede (2000)
Full size table
Table 8 GLOBE’ scores of cultural dimensions by country
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrasco, A., Francoeur, C., Labelle, R. et al. Appointing Women to Boards: Is There a Cultural Bias?. J Bus Ethics 129, 429–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2166-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2166-z

Keywords

search

Navigation