Multiple Facets of Compassion: The Impact of Social Dominance Orientation and Economic Systems Justification

Abstract

Business students appear predisposed to select disciplines consistent with pre-existing worldviews. These disciplines (e.g., economics) then further reinforce the worldviews which may not always be adaptive. For example, high levels of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) is a trait often found in business school students (Sidanius et al., Political Psychol 12(4):691–721, 1991). SDO is a competitive and hierarchical worldview and belief-system that ascribes people to higher or lower social rankings. While research suggests that high levels of SDO may be linked to lower levels of empathy, research has not established the potential relationship between another related adaptive trait in the workplace, compassion. Compassion facilitates workplace performance by lowering levels of litigation, easing stress, and facilitating cooperation. Accordingly, the following study aimed to examine the relationship between SDO and compassion while hypothesizing Economic Systems Justification (ESJ) would mediate this relationship. Because of the importance of compassion in the workplace, the prevalence of SDO in the business academic community (Sidanius et al. 1991) and the topicality of ESJ, we conducted our study with business school students. Results confirmed all but one hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1990). Dominant ideologies. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin

  2. Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and ameta-analysis of the effectiveness of Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2–4), 109–160. doi:10.1080/15228830802094429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2003). Why does affect matter in organizations? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, R., Gelkopf, M., Heinberg, Y., & Zimbardo, P. (in press). Developing resiliency and promoting tolerance toward the other in elementary school students facing ongoing rocket shelling.

  5. Blincoe, S., & Harris, M. J. (2009). Prejudice reduction in white students: Comparing three conceptual approaches. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4), 232–242. doi:10.1037/a0017851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barret, R. (2012). Love, fear and the destiny of nations: The impact of the evolution of human consciousness on world affairs. Amazon Digital Services, Inc.

  7. Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4(2), 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725. doi:10.2307/258391.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brockner, J. (1992). Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors. California Management Review, 34(2), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brockner, J. (1994). Perceived fairness and survivors’ reactions to layoffs, or how downsizing organizations can do well by doing good. Social Justice Research, 7, 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheon, B. K., Im, D., Harada, T., Kim, J., Mathur, V. A., Scimeca, J. M., et al. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. Neuroimage, 57(2), 642–650. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Lipke, T. (2009). Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers. Annual New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174–181. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04508.x.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cosley, B. J., McCoy, S. K., Saslow, L. R., & Epel, E. S. (2010). Is compassion for others stress buffering? Consequences of compassion and social support for physiological reactivity to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 816–823. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Creswell, J. D., Welch, W. T., Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mann, T. (2005). Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychological Science, 16(11), 846–851. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crocker, J., Niiya, Y., & Mischkowski, D. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19(7), 740–747. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02150.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Depue, R. A., & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313–395. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000063.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Jones, W. H. (2005). Personality: Contemporary theory and research (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ensari, N. K., & Miller, N. (2006). The application of the personalization model in diversity management. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 589–607. doi:10.1177/1368430206067679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 79–87. doi:10.2307/256899.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, N., & Rivis, A. (2010). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research And Practice, 84(3), 239–255. doi:10.1348/147608310X526511.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gilbert, P., & Procter, S. (2006). Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self-criticism: Overview and pilot study. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 353–379. doi:10.1002/cpp.507.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grant, K. (2008). Who are the lepers in our organizations? A case for compassionate leadership. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 3(2-), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of ‘dark personalities’ (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang, J. Y., Lackey, K., & Plante, T. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s compassionate love scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56, 421–428. doi:10.1007/s11089-007-0117-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Economic systems justification: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jost, J., Pelham, B., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 586–602. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808–827. doi:10.1177/0002764203260211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20(1), 99–126. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557–590. doi:10.2307/2667109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McLaughlin, E., Huges, G., Fergusson, R., & Westmarland, L. (2003). Restorative justice critical issues. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McFarland, S. G. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Molinsky, A. L., Grant, A. M., & Margolis, J. D. (2012). The bedside manner of homo economicus: How and why priming an economic schema reduces compassion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. doi:10.1080/15298860309027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neff, K. D., & Germer, K. C. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263–287. doi:10.1080/13576500444000317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 23–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Reich, W. (1989). Speaking of suffering: A moral account of compassion. Soundings, 72(1), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476–485.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rockliff, H., Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Lightman, S., & Glover, D. (2008). A pilot exploration of heart rate variability and salivary cortisol responses to compassion-focused imagery. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 5(3), 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sherman, K. D., Bunyan, P. D., Creswell, J. D., & Jaremka, M. L. (2009). Psychological vulnerability and stress: The effects of self-affirmation on sympathetic nervous system responses to naturalistic stressors. Health Psychology, 28(5), 554–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). Racism and support of free-market capitalism: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14(3), 381–401. doi:10.2307/3791704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Martin, M., & Stallworth, L. M. (1991). Consensual racism and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory. Political Psychology, 12(4), 691–721. doi:10.2307/3791552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2012). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 77–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Umphress, E. E., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Dietz, J. (2007). When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Laar, C., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Sinclair, S. (1999). The three Rs of academic achievement: Reading, ‘riting, and racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 139–151. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zellars, K. L., & Perrewé, P. L. (2001). Affective personality and the content of emotional social support: Coping in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 459. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Martin.

Appendices

Appendix: Compassion-Related Scales

Short Form of the Self-Compassion Scale

  1. 1.

    When I fail at something important to me I become consumed by feelings of inadequacy.

  2. 2.

    I try to be understanding and patient toward those aspects of my personality I don’t like.

  3. 3.

    When something painful happens I try to take a balanced view of the situation.

  4. 4.

    When I’m feeling down, I tend to feel like most other people are probably happier than I am.

  5. 5.

    I try to see my failings as part of the human condition.

  6. 6.

    When I’m going through a very hard time, I give myself the caring and tenderness I need.

  7. 7.

    When something upsets me I try to keep my emotions in balance.

  8. 8.

    When I fail at something that’s important to me, I tend to feel alone in my failure.

  9. 9.

    When I’m feeling down I tend to obsess and fixate on everything that’s wrong.

  10. 10.

    When I feel inadequate in some way, I try to remind myself that feelings of inadequacy are shared by most people.

  11. 11.

    I’m disapproving and judgmental about my own flaws and inadequacies.

  12. 12.

    I’m intolerant and impatient toward those aspects of my personality I don’t like.

Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale

  1. 1.

    When I hear about someone (a stranger) going through a difficult time, I feel a great deal of compassion for him or her.

  2. 2.

    I tend to feel compassion for people, even though I do not know them.

  3. 3.

    One of the activities that provide me with the most meaning to my life is helping others in the world when they need help.

  4. 4.

    I would rather engage in actions that help others, even though they are strangers, than engage in actions that would help me.

  5. 5.

    I often have tender feelings toward people (strangers) when they seem to be in need.

The Compassion Evaluation Scale

Scale 1: Expressing Compassion for Others

  1. 1.

    People will take advantage of me if they see me as too compassionate

  2. 2.

    Being compassionate toward people who have done bad things is letting them off the hook

  3. 3.

    There are some people in life who don’t deserve compassion

  4. 4.

    I fear that being too compassionate makes people an easy target

  5. 5.

    People will take advantage of you if you are too forgiving and compassionate

  6. 6.

    I worry that if I am compassionate, vulnerable people can be drawn to me and drain my emotional resources

  7. 7.

    People need to help themselves rather than waiting for others to help them

  8. 8.

    I fear that if I am compassionate, some people will become too dependent upon me

  9. 9.

    Being too compassionate makes people soft and easy to take advantage of

  10. 10.

    For some people, I think discipline and proper punishments are more helpful than being compassionate to them

Scale 2: Responding to the Expression of Compassion from Others

  1. 1.

    Wanting others to be kind to oneself is a weakness

  2. 2.

    I fear that when I need people to be kind and understanding they wont be

  3. 3.

    I’m fearful of becoming dependent on the care from others because they might not always be available or willing to give it

  4. 4.

    I often wonder whether displays of warmth and kindness from others are genuine

  5. 5.

    Feelings of kindness from others are somehow frightening

  6. 6.

    When people are kind and compassionate towards me I feel anxious or embarrassed

  7. 7.

    If people are friendly and kind I worry they will find out something bad about me that will change their mind

  8. 8.

    I worry that people are only kind and compassionate if they want something from me

  9. 9.

    When people are kind and compassionate towards me I feel empty and sad

  10. 10.

    If people are kind I feel they are getting too close

  11. 11.

    Even though other people are kind to me, I have rarely felt warmth from my relationships with others

  12. 12.

    I try to keep my distance from others even if I know they are kind

  13. 13.

    If I think someone is being kind and caring towards me, I ‘put up a barrier’

Scale 3: Expressing Kindness and Compassion Towards Yourself

  1. 1.

    I feel that I don’t deserve to be kind and forgiving to myself

  2. 2.

    If I really think about being kind and gentle with myself it makes me sad

  3. 3.

    Getting on in life is about being tough rather than compassionate

  4. 4.

    I would rather not know what being ‘kind and compassionate to myself’ feels like

  5. 5.

    When I try and feel kind and warm to myself I just feel kind of empty

  6. 6.

    I fear that if I start to feel compassion and warmth for myself, I will feel overcome with a sense of loss/grief

  7. 7.

    I fear that if I become kinder and less self-critical to myself then my standards will drop

  8. 8.

    I fear that if I am more self compassionate I will become a weak person

  9. 9.

    I have never felt compassion for myself, so I would not know where to begin to develop these feelings

  10. 10.

    I worry that if I start to develop compassion for myself I will become dependent on it

  11. 11.

    I fear that if I become too compassionate to myself I will lose my self-criticism and my flaws will show

  12. 12.

    I fear that if I develop compassion for myself, I will become someone I do not want to be

  13. 13.

    I fear that if I become too compassionate to myself others will reject me

  14. 14.

    I find it easier to be critical towards myself rather than compassionate

  15. 15.

    I fear that if I am too compassionate towards myself, bad things will happen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, D., Seppala, E., Heineberg, Y. et al. Multiple Facets of Compassion: The Impact of Social Dominance Orientation and Economic Systems Justification. J Bus Ethics 129, 237–249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2157-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social dominance orientation
  • Economic systems justification
  • Compassion