Business ethics and firm economic performance have traditionally often been regarded as mutually exclusive ends. We challenge this “either-or” belief and analyze when and how ethical firm leadership and firm performance may harmonize well. In extension of earlier research on ethical leadership and performance at the individual and team level, we study the context–dependency of the organization level relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. We propose a moderated mediation model of the link between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance, identifying mediating (organizational ethical culture) and moderating (organizational ethics program) variables unique to the organization-level of analysis. CEO ethical leadership is argued to work through organizational ethical culture which promotes firm performance under the condition that there is a strong corporate ethics program in place. Results from a multisource cross-sectional study, in which we surveyed 145 participants from 32 organizations and validated organizational performance ratings by objective performance data, showed support for our conceptual model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
An alternative way of reasoning could be that organizational ethical culture affects the selection of an ethical CEO and/or whether the existing CEO engages in ethical leadership (cf. Schein 2004). We therefore also calculated the reverse contingent indirect effect model (with organizational ethical culture as the independent variable, CEO ethical leadership as the mediating variable, the corporate ethics program as the moderating variable, and firm performance as the dependent variable). This model was not significant, corroborating our analysis which advances CEO ethical leadership as the influence on culture.
Adam, A. M., & Rachman-Moore, D. (2004). The methods used to implement an ethical code of conduct and employee attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 225–244.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1996). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Avey, J. B., Palanski, M. E., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2010). When leadership goes unnoticed: The moderating role of follower self-esteem on the relationship between ethical leadership and follower behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 573–582.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1207–1220.
Bentler, P. M. (1980). Mutivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419–456.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2007). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615–633.
Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2001). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 515–549.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2003). Is values-based leadership ethical leadership? In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues mangement: Emerging perspectives on values in organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 151–173). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. (2011). How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 399–411.
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1–22.
Ciulla, J. B. (1995). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 5–24.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767–789.
Danielson, M., & Press, E. (2003). Accounting returns revisited: Evidence of their usefulness in estimating economic returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 493–530.
Davis, S. M. (1984). Managing corporate culture. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.
Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969.
Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2009). Empowering behaviour and leader fairness and integrity: Studying perceptions of ethical leader behaviour from a levels-of-analysis perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 199–230.
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005.
Dickson, M. W., Smith, D. B., Grojean, M. W., & Ehrhart, M. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 197–217.
Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67–80.
Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791–808.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., & Giessner, S. R. (2012). The development and maintenance of ethical leadership: A question of embeddedness? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(1), 7–19.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438–1446.
Falkenberg, L., & Herremans, I. (1995). Ethical behaviours in organizations: Directed by the informal or formal systems? Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 133–143.
Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7, 25–35.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Canella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.
Giberson, T. R., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., Mitchelson, J. K., Randall, K. R., & Clark, M. A. (2009). Leadership and organizational culture: Linking CEO characteristics to cultural values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(2), 123–137.
Giessner, S. R., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2010). Using a relational models perspective to understand normatively appropriate conduct in ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 43–55.
Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner, J. A., III (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 462–481.
Groom, B. (2011). Bosses put profit before ethics, says survey. Financial Times. Retrieved January 10, 2013, from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ceb08890-edd8-11e0-acc7-00144feab49a.html#axzz2w9htlolX.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation. The Academy of Management Executive, 6(2), 43–54.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.
Johnson, C. E. (2009). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544.
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51–69.
Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 923–947.
Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unraveling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 262–281.
Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of transformational CEOs on the performance of small- to medium-sized firms: Does organizational context matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 923–934.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.
Loveman, G. W. (1998). Employee satisfaction, customer loyalty, and financial performance: An empirical examination of the service profit chain in retail banking. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 18–31.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.
McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852–863.
Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications. Boston: Duxbury.
O’Dwyer, B., & Madden, G. (2006). Ethical codes of conduct in Irish companies: A survey of code content and enforcement procedures. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 217–236.
Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 259–278.
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., & Dess, G. G. (1999). Limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25, 935–953.
Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 345–359.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.
Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The Leadership Virtues Questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 235–250.
Sackman, S. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140–161.
Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., et al. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1053–1078.
Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 135–151.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.
Shin, Y. (2012). CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 299–312.
Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ word and deed as a research focus. Organizational Science, 13(1), 18–35.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 663–673.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 617–633.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P. J., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.
Solomon, R. C. (1999). A better way to think about business: How personal integrity leads to corporate success. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stewart, S. M., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Woehr, D. J., & McIntyre, M. D. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 207–215.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., Smith-Crowe, K., & Umphress, E. E. (2003). Building houses on rocks: The role of ethical infrastructure in organizations. Social Justice Research, 3, 285–307.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M. E., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Xin, K., & Wu, J. B. (2006). Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 113–137.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
van Knippenberg, D., Dawson, J., West, M. A., & Homan, A. C. (2011). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64(3), 307–336.
Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 355–380.
Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., et al. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95–118.
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517–529.
Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., & Workman, K. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.
Walumbwa, F. O., Morrison, E. W., & Christensen, A. L. (2012). Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: The mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 953–964.
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.
Wang, H., Tsui, A. S., & Xin, K. R. (2011). CEO leadership behaviors, organizational performance, and employees’ attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 92–105.
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.
The present research was supported by a project funding from the German Excellence Initiative of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University in Munich granted to the first author.
Items for Measuring Ethical Leadership
The CEO of my organization …
is interested in how his/her employees feel and how they are doing.
takes time for personal contact with his/her employees.
pays attention to employees’ personal needs.
takes time to talk about work-related emotions.
is genuinely concerned about employees’ personal development.
sympathizes with employees when they have problems.
cares about his/her employees.
keeps his/her promises.
can be trusted to do the things he/she says.
can be relied on to honor his/her commitments.
always keeps his/her words.
makes his/her decision basing on accurate information collected beforehand.
makes consistent decisions that base on reliable standards.
considers in his/her actions the rights of his/her employees.
considers in his/her actions multiple viewpoints.
rewards performance in a fair manner.
rewards according to the responsibility the respective employee has.
feels responsible for society.
values long-term relationships with business partners.
is interested in a long-term orientation of success.
feels committed to the welfare of future generations.
organizes business processes in an environmentally friendly manner.
ensures that the organization is a “good citizen.”
creates awareness of the responsibility of organizations for society and environment.
offers followers the possibility for social engagement.
enforces the long-term organizational success against short-term wins.
realizes the responsibility of the organization for society.
thinks that he/she is an ordinary person who is no better than others.
would not want people to treat him/her as though he/she were superior to them.
thinks that he/she is entitled to more respect than the average person is.
wants people to know that he/she is an important person of high status.
Items for Measuring Organizational Ethical Culture
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should conduct him-/herself appropriately toward others within the organization.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should obtain proper authorizations.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should use company equipment responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should use his/her working hours responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should handle money and other financial assets responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should deal with conflicts of interests and sideline activities responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should deal with confidential information responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should deal with external persons and organizations responsibly.
The organization makes it sufficiently clear to each employee how he/she should deal with environmental issues in a responsible way.
In my organization, it is sufficiently clear to everybody how he/she is expected to conduct him-/herself in a responsible way.
In my organization, employees are never asked to do things that conflict with their conscience.
In order to be successful in my organization, nobody has to sacrifice his/her personal norms and values.
In my organization, employees have sufficient time at their disposal to carry out their tasks responsibly.
In my organization, employees have sufficient information at their disposal to carry out their tasks responsibly.
In my organization, employees have adequate resources at their disposal to carry out their tasks responsibly.
In my organization, employees are never put under pressure to break the rules.
In my organization, everyone is totally committed to the (stipulated) norms and values of the organization.
In my organization, an atmosphere of mutual trust prevails.
In my organization, everyone has the best interests of the organization at heart.
In my organization, a mutual relationship of trust prevails between employees and management.
In my organization, everyone takes the existing norms and standards seriously.
In my organization, everyone treats one another with respect.
The conduct of the top management reflects a shared set of norms and values.
The top management sets a good example in terms of ethical behavior.
The top management communicates the importance of ethics and integrity clearly and convincingly.
The top management would never authorize unethical or illegal conduct to meet business goals.
If a colleague does something which is not permitted, a manager will find out about it.
If a colleague does something which is not permitted, another employee will find out about it.
If a manager does something which is not permitted, someone in the organization will find out about it.
If someone criticizes other people’s behavior, he/she will receive feedback on any action taken as a result of his/her criticism.
In my organization, there is adequate awareness of potential violations and incidents in the organization.
Management is aware of the type of incidents and unethical conduct that occur in my organization.
In my organization, there is adequate scope to discuss unethical conduct.
In my organization, there is adequate scope to report unethical conduct.
In my organization, there is ample opportunity for discussing moral dilemmas.
If someone is called to account for his/her conduct, it is done in a respectful manner.
In my organization, there is adequate scope to correct unethical conduct.
In my organization, people are accountable for their actions.
In my organization, ethical conduct is valued highly.
In my organization, only people with integrity are considered for promotion.
If necessary, managers are disciplined in my organization if they behave unethically.
The people that are successful in my organization stick to the norms and standards of the organization.
In my organization, ethical conduct is rewarded.
In my organization, employees will be disciplined if they behave unethically.
If unethical conduct is reported to management, those involved would be disciplined fairly regardless of their position.
In my organization, employees who conduct themselves with integrity stand a greater chance to receive a positive performance appraisal than employees who conduct themselves without integrity.
About this article
Cite this article
Eisenbeiss, S.A., van Knippenberg, D. & Fahrbach, C.M. Doing Well by Doing Good? Analyzing the Relationship Between CEO Ethical Leadership and Firm Performance. J Bus Ethics 128, 635–651 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2124-9
- CEO leadership
- Corporate ethics program
- Ethical leadership
- Firm performance
- Organizational ethical culture