Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 279–289 | Cite as

Are You Satisfied With Your Pay When You Compare? It Depends on Your Love of Money, Pay Comparison Standards, and Culture



We develop a theoretical model of income and pay comparison satisfaction with two mediators (love of money and pay comparison standards), examine the direct and the indirect paths of our model, and treat culture (the US vs. Spain) as a moderator. Based on 311 professors in the US and Spain, we demonstrate a positive direct path and a negative indirect path. Our subsequent multi-group analysis illustrates: For American professors, their direct path shows that income is directly related to high pay comparison satisfaction. Their indirect path reveals the following new insights: Professors with high income have a strong love of money orientation, set their pay equity comparison standards (deserved pay and other’s salary) significantly higher than their own salary, and as a consequence, have low pay comparison satisfaction. For Spanish professors, love of money is not related to their pay comparison standards which are slightly (non-significantly) higher than their own self-reported income. Neither the direct nor the indirect path is significant. The standardized total effect of income to pay satisfaction is positive for American professors, but negligible for Spanish professors. Are you satisfied with your pay when you compare? Our results demonstrate that pay comparison satisfaction depends on not only one’s income but also one’s love of money and pay equity comparison standards which may vary across cultures.


Professors’ income Money attitude Love of money Pay comparison standards Pay comparison satisfaction Internal and external referent Deserved pay Other’s pay The US Spain Cross-cultural 


  1. Adams, J. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 67, 22–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., & Hongladarom, C. (2011). Violation of Buddhist five percepts, money consciousness, and the tendency to pay bribes among organizational employees in Bangkok, Thailand. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., Tybout, A. M., Craig, C. S., & Sternthal, B. (1979). The contrast validity of the tripartite classification of attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordia, P., & Blau, G. (1998). Pay referent comparison and pay level satisfaction in private versus public sector organizations in India. The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 9(1), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444)., Methodology Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and needs as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, J. Q., Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, N. Y. (2013). Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, Y. J., & Tang, T. L. P. (2013). The bright and dark sides of religiosity among university students: Do gender, college major, and income matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiu, R. K., Luk, V. W. M., & Tang, T. L. P. (2002). Retaining and motivating employees: Compensation preferences in Hong Kong and China. Personnel Review, 31(4), 402–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2015). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (4th ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdener, C., & Garkavenko, V. (2012). Money attitudes in Kazakhstan. Journal of International Business and Economics, 12(3), 87–94.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farh, J. L., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. S. (1991). Cultural relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furnham, A. (1984). Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Gbadamosi, G., & Joubert, P. (2005). Money ethic, moral conduct and work related attitudes: Field study from the public sector in Swaziland. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 754–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundant effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystorm, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harpaz, I. (1990). The importance of work goals: An international perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heneman, H., & Judge, T. A. (2000). Compensation attitudes. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice (pp. 61–103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Heneman, H., & Schwab, D. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129–141.Google Scholar
  29. Heneman, R. L. (1992). Merit pay. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  31. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Li, N. H., & Shen, L. X. (2009). Wealth, warmth, and well-being: Whether happiness is relative or absolute depends on whether it is about money, acquisition, or consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jia, S. W., Zhang, W. X., Li, P., Feng, T. Y., & Li, H. (2013). Attitude toward money modulates outcome processing: An ERP study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jurgensen, C. F. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?). Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 267–276.Google Scholar
  37. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Laws, J., & Tang, T. L. P. (1999). Japanese transplants and union membership: The case of Nissan Motor Manufacturing Corporation. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 64(2), 16–26.Google Scholar
  41. Lea, S. E. G., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 161–209.Google Scholar
  42. Lemrová, S., Reiterová, E., Fatěnová, R., Lemr, K., & Tang, T. L. P. (2013). Money is power: Monetary intelligence—love of money and temptation of materialism among Czech University students. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1915-8.Google Scholar
  43. Lim, V. K. G., & Sng, Q. S. (2006). Does parental job insecurity matter? Money anxiety, money motives, and work motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1078–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lim, V. K. G., & Teo, T. S. H. (1997). Sex, money and financial hardship: An empirical study of attitudes towards money among undergraduates in Singapore. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, B. C., & Tang, T. L. P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaleb, V. M., Shaw, K. N., & Denny, A. T. (1980). The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruneberg, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life (pp. 363–388). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  49. McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  50. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mickel, A. E., & Barron, L. A. (2008). Getting “more bang for the buck”: Symbolic value of monetary rewards in organizations. Journal of Management Inquire, 17(4), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation (11th ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. S., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, T. W., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mitchell, T. R., & Mickel, A. (1999). The meaning of money: An individual difference perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 568–578.Google Scholar
  55. Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Omagor, C., Mpamizo, B., & Ntayi, J. M. (2011). The love of money, pressure to perform and unethical marketing behavior in the cosmetic industry in Uganda. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(4), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 108–119.Google Scholar
  57. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2013). Organizational behavior: Tools for success (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  58. Rice, R. W., Phillips, S. M., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rubenstein, C. (1981). Money and self-esteem, relationships, secrecy, envy, satisfaction. Psychology Today, 15(5), 94–118.Google Scholar
  60. Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (Eds.). (2000). Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  61. Sardžoska, E., & Tang, T. L. P. (2012). Work-related behavioral intentions in Macedonia: Coping strategies, work environment, love of money, job satisfaction, and demographic variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J. E. (2002). Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Baron, R. A. (2013). “I care about nature, but…”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1251–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: It’s not the money, it’s the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tang, T. L. P. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tang, T. L. P. (1993). The meaning of money: Extension and exploration of the money ethic scale in a sample of university students in Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang, T. L. P. (1995). The development of a short Money Ethic Scale: Attitudes toward money and pay satisfaction revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(6), 809–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tang, T. L. P. (1996). Pay differentials as a function of rater’s sex, money ethic, and job incumbent’s sex: A test of the Matthew effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tang, T. L. P. (2014). Toward a theory of monetary intelligence: Making money, ethical decisions, and the grade. Unpublished manuscript. Middle Tennessee State University.Google Scholar
  70. Tang, T. L. P., Chen, Y. J., & Sutarso, T. (2008a). Bad apples in bad (business) barrels: The love of money, Machiavellianism, risk tolerance, and unethical behavior. Management Decision, 46(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tang, T. L. P., & Gilbert, P. R. (1995). Attitudes toward money as related to intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, stress and work-related attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tang, T. L. P., Kim, J. K., & Tang, D. S. H. (2000). Does attitude toward money moderate the relationship between intrinsic job satisfaction and voluntary turnover? Human Relations, 53(2), 213–245.Google Scholar
  74. Tang, T. L. P., & Liu, H. (2012). Love of money and unethical behavior intention: Does an authentic supervisor’s personal integrity and character (ASPIRE) make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tang, T. L. P., Luna-Arocas, R., Quintanilla Pardo, I., & Tang, T. L. N. (2012). Materialism and the bright and dark sides of the financial dream in Spain: The positive role of money attitudes—The Matthew effect. Applied Psychology: An International Review. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00533.x.
  76. Tang, T. L. P., Luna-Arocas, R., & Sutarso, T. (2005). From income to pay satisfaction: The love of money and pay equity comparison as mediators and culture (the US and Spain) and gender as moderators. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 3(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tang, T. L. P., & Sutarso, T. (2013). Falling or not falling into temptation? Multiple faces of temptation, monetary intelligence, and unethical intentions across gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Akande, A., Allen, M. W., Alzubaidi, A. S., Ansari, M. A., et al. (2006a). The love of money and pay level satisfaction: Measurement and functional equivalence in 29 geopolitical entities around the world. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicai, F., et al. (2011). The love of money is the root of all evil: Pay satisfaction and CPI as moderators. In L. A. Toombs (Ed.), Best Paper Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  80. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicai, F., et al. (2013, August 9–13). Are money smart people satisfied with pay and life? A theory of monetary intelligence. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida.Google Scholar
  81. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Davis, G. M. T., Dolinski, D., Ibrahim, A. H. S., & Wagner, S. L. (2008b). To help or not to help? The Good Samaritan effect and the love of money on helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 865–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tang, T. L. P., Tang, T. L. N., & Homaifar, B. Y. (2006b). Income, the love of money, pay comparison, and pay satisfaction: Race and gender as moderators. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 476–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2006). The role of money and religiosity in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wong, H. M. (2008). Religiousness, love of money, and ethical attitudes of Malaysian evangelical Christians in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yamauchi, K. T., & Templer, D. I. (1982). The development of a money attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 522–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhou, X. Y., & Gao, D. G. (2008). Social support and money as pain management mechanisms. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Management and Marketing, Jennings A. Jones College of BusinessMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations