Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 207–220

Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment

  • Eric Lamm
  • Jennifer Tosti-Kharas
  • Cynthia E. King
Article

Abstract

This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion of sustainability behaviors by introducing the construct of perceived organizational support toward the environment (POS-E). We propose and empirically test an integrated model whereby we test the association of POS-E with employees’ organizational citizenship behaviors toward the environment (OCB-E) as well as to job attitudes. Results indicated that POS-E was positively related to OCB-E, job satisfaction, organizational identification, and psychological empowerment, and negatively related to turnover intentions. We also found that psychological empowerment partially mediated the relationship between POS-E and the dependent variables. We discuss the theoretical implications as well as practical implications for managers seeking to encourage sustainability in their organizations.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Environment Extra-role behaviors Organizational citizenship behavior Perceived organizational support Psychological empowerment Sustainability 

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 548–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, R. (2012, April 10). Unilever to crowdsource sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/news/unilever-to-crowdsource-sustainability/4001074.article. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
  6. Baltes, B., Zhdanova, L., & Clark, M. (2011). Examining the relationships between personality, coping strategies, and work-family conflict. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  12. Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bozeman, D. P., & Perrewe, P. L. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldwell, S. D., Herold, D. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2004). Toward and understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. Seashore, E. Lawler, P. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures and practices (p. 84). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, X. P. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: A predictor of employee voluntary turnover. In D. L. Turnipseed (Ed.), Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 435–454). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, X. P., Hui, C., & Sego, D. J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 922–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chou, S. Y., & Pearson, J. M. (2012). Organizational citizenship behavior in IT professionals: An expectancy theory approach. Management Research Review, 35, 1170–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business and Society, 48, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2008). Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galpin, T., & Whittington, J. L. (2012). Sustainability leadership: From strategy to results. Journal of Business Strategy, 33(4), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2010). How do corporations embed sustainability across the organization? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. He, H., & Li, Y. (2011). CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaramillo, F., Mulki, J. P., & Solomon, P. (2006). The role of ethical climate on salesperson’s role stress, job attitudes, turnover intention, and job performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(3), 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkin, T. A., McShane, L., & Webster, J. (2011). Green information technologies and systems: Employees perceptions’ of organizational practices. Business and Society, 50, 266–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jung, J. (2012). As Wal-Mart greens. Institutional Investor-International Edition, 37(3), 34–72.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, H.-R., Lee, M., Lee, H.-T., & Kim, N.-M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koh, H. C., & Boo, E. H. Y. (2001). The link between organizational ethics and job satisfaction: A study of managers in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lacy, P., Cooper, T., Hayward, R., & Neuberger, L. (2010). A new era of sustainability: UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study 2010. Retrieved from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/UNGC_Accenture_CEO_Study_2010.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
  37. Lamm, E., & Meeks, M. (2009). Workplace fun: The moderating effects of generational differences. Employee Relations, 31, 613–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & Williams, E. (2013). Read this article but don’t print it: Organizational citizenship behavior toward the environment. Group and Organization Management, 38(2), 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu, Y. (2008). Perceived organizational support and expatriate organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Review, 38, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2012). Empowerment-fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38, 1231–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miel, R. (2012, May 23). Ford standardizing sustainability plans. Retrieved from http://www.plasticsnews.com/headlines2.html?id=25533. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
  43. Morales, A. (2012, October 22). Ikea more than doubles renewable-energy spending as costs climb. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-22/ikea-more-than-doubles-renewable-energy-spending-as-costs-climb. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
  44. Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mudrack, P. (2007). Individual personality factors that affect normative beliefs about the rightness of corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 46, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., & Locander, W. B. (2006). Effects of ethical climate and supervisory trust on salesperson’s job attitudes and intentions to quit. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, J. F., & Locander, W. B. (2008). Effect of ethical climate on turnover intention: Linking attitudinal-and stress theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & McKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Podsakoff, N. P., Blume, B. D., Whiting, S. W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. C. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours: A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 554–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruiz-Palomino, P., Martinez-Canas, R., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Ethical culture and employee outcomes: The mediating role of person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Aguilera, R. V. (2010). Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality (pp. 69–88). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Schaltegger, S., Berkmann, M., & Hansen, E. G. (2013). Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: Mapping the field. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scott, A. (2012, April 11). P&G shares sustainability scorecard with rivals. Retrieved from http://www.supplymanagement.com/news/2012/pg-shares-sustainability-scorecard-with-rivals/. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
  59. Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analysis review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, A. M., & O’Sullivan, T. (2012). Environmentally responsible behaviour in the workplace: An internal social marketing approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 908–935.Google Scholar
  65. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas, T. E., & Lamm, E. (2012). Legitimacy and organizational sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhu, W., Sosik, J. J., & Riggio, R. E. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 13(3), 186–212.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Lamm
    • 1
  • Jennifer Tosti-Kharas
    • 1
  • Cynthia E. King
    • 1
  1. 1.College of BusinessSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations