Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Ethical Context on Employees’ Ethical Issue Recognition and Ethical Judgments

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 January 2015

Abstract

When investigating the impact of organizational ethical context on individual ethical decision-making, past work has reported mixed results, with some studies indicating that a strong ethical work environment is associated with increased ethical reasoning, and other studies indicating that such an environment has little to no influence on the way ethical issues are addressed. Given these contradictory findings, we utilize multiple theoretical perspectives to assess the degree to which employees’ perceptions of ethical values, ethical culture, and corporate social responsibility moderate the relationship between their ethical issue recognition and ethical judgments. Data obtained from employees of a financial services firm located primarily in the Midwestern United States supported the research hypothesis, with organizational ethical context weakening the recognition–judgment linkage. Results are compared to prior studies, and the managerial and research implications of the findings are discussed, along with the study’s limitations and suggestions for future inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision-making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1038–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57, 338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravender, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 221–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B., & Lewis, W. F. (1997). The influence of deontological and teleological considerations and ethical climate on sales managers’ intentions to reward or punish sales force behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountant’s ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, G. M., Valentine, S., & Finn, D. W. (2007). Ethical reasoning and equitable relief. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19, 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 8(2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1989). Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory research and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision-making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinov-Bennie, N., & Pflugrath, G. (2009). The strength of an accounting firm’s ethical environment and the quality of auditors’ judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwachukwu, S. L. S., & Vitell, S. J. (1997). The influence of corporate culture on managerial ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(8), 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo, J. G., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Ethical perceptions of marketers: The interaction effects of Machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., & Vitell, S. J. (1991). Analyzing the ethical decision-making of sales professionals. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11(4), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohs, J. H., & Brannick, T. (1999). Codes of conduct: Predictors of Irish managers’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(4), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1970). Principles of criminology (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. W., & Russell, R. S. (2009). Case problem S1.2—Transformer replacement at mountain states electric service. In Operations management (6th ed.) 49. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udas, K., Fuerst, W. L., & Paradice, D. B. (1996). An investigation of ethical perceptions of public sector MIS professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Barnett, T. (2007). Perceived organizational ethics and the ethical decisions of sales and marketing personnel. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 27(4), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008a). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008b). Professional ethical standards, corporate social responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Godkin, L. (2009). Ethics, social responsibility, and ethical reasoning in an education-based health science center: When doing good results in good employees. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 7, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., Fleischman, G., Sprague, R., & Godkin, L. (2010). Exploring the ethicality of firing employees who blog. Human Resource Management, 49(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., Nam, S. H., Hollingworth, D., & Hall, C. (2013). Ethical context and decision-making ethical decision-making: Examination of an alternative statistical approach for identifying variable relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1879-8.

  • Verbeke, W., Uwerkerk, C., & Peelen, E. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors on decision-making ethical decision-making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C. & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, D. C., & Jones, C. A. (1997). The importance of context: The ethical work climate construct and models of ethical decision-making: An agenda for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of North Dakota, 293 Centennial Drive, Mailstop 8377, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-8377, USA

    David Hollingworth & Sean Valentine

Authors
  1. David Hollingworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sean Valentine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean Valentine.

Additional information

This research was supported, in part, by the College of Business and Public Administration and the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of North Dakota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollingworth, D., Valentine, S. The Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Ethical Context on Employees’ Ethical Issue Recognition and Ethical Judgments. J Bus Ethics 128, 457–466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2088-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2088-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation