Abstract
Exposure to bullying at work is a serious social stressor, having important consequences for the victim, the co-workers, and the whole organization. Bullying can be understood as a multi-causal phenomenon: the result of individual differences between workers, deficiencies in the work environment or an interaction between individual and situational factors. The results of the previous studies confirmed that some characteristics within an individual may predispose to bullying others and/or being bullied. In the present study, we intend to clarify the relationships between workplace bullying considered from the victim’s and the perpetrator’s points of view, the employee Machiavellianism as a personality factor and the perceptions of organizational culture as depicted by Cameron and Quinn. The sample consisted of 117 workers, employed in different organizations in Poland. The empirical data regarding both being exposed to bullying as well as being a perpetrator of bullying were obtained by the use of self-reports from participants. According to the expectations, Machiavellianism predicted involvement in bullying others. The groups of bullies and bully-victims had a higher Machiavellianism level compared to the groups of victims and persons non-involved in bullying. The results showed that being bullied was negatively related to the perceptions of clan and adhocracy cultures and positively related to the perceptions of hierarchy culture. The results of a moderated regression analysis demonstrated that Machiavellianism was a significant moderator of the relationships between the perceptions of adhocracy and hierarchy cultures and being bullied. Theoretical and practical implications of the results were discussed.
References
Agervold, M. (2009). The significance of organizational factors for the incidence of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 267–276.
Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 297–309.
Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimizations in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1023–1034.
Bass, K., Barnett, T., & Brown, G. (1999). Individual difference variables, ethical judgments, and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 183–206.
Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 571–575.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012.
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chomczyński, P. (2008). Mobbing w pracy z perspektywy interakcjonalnej. Proces stawania się ofiarą. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Chudzicka, A., & Makselon-Kowalska, B. (2004). Zachowania nieetyczne w środowisku pracy. In K. Popiolek (Ed.), Kryzysy, katastrofy, kataklizmy. Zjawiska współczesnej cywilizacji, (pp. 232–244). Poznań: Stowarzyszenie Psychologia i Architektura.
Corzine, J. B., & Hozier, G. C. (2005). Exploratory study of Machiavellianism and bases of social power in bankers. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 356–362.
Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 335–349.
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47.
Derczyński, W. (2002). Szykany w miejscu pracy. Komunikat z badań. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
Draheim, S. E. (2004). Makiaweliczna osobowość niepełnoletniego świadka. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27.
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24–44.
Einarsen, H., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace, International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor and Francis.
Glasø, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 313–319.
Grzesiuk, L. (2008). Mobbing w miejscu pracy—czynniki ryzyka i konsekwencje. In J. Brzeziński, & M. Cierpiałkowska (ed.), Zdrowie i choroba. Problemy teorii, diagnozy i praktyki, (pp. 227–274). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495–509.
Harvey, M., Treadway, D., Thompson Heames, J., & Duke, A. (2008). Bullying in the 21st century global organization: An ethical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 27–40.
Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work and Stress, 23(4), 349–358.
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936.
Hoel, H., Einarsen, S., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Organisational effects of bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 145–161). London: Taylor & Francis.
Hryniewicz, J. (2004). Polityczny i kulturowy kontekst rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Scholar.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford.
Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037–1051.
Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85–117.
Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010). Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the work-place. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868–1896.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
Kmiecik-Baran, K., & Rybicki, J. (2004). Mobbing—zagrożenie współczesnego miejsca pracy. Gdańsk: Pomorski Instytut Demokratyczny.
Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). When prey turns predatory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 352–377.
Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119–126.
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.
Lind, K., Glasø, L., Pallesen, S., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Personality profiles among targets and nontargets of workplace bullying. European Psychologist, 14(3), 231–237.
Linton, D. K., & Power, J. L. (2013). The personality traits of workplace bullies are often shared by their victims: Is there a dark side to victims? Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 738–743.
Locke, K. D., & Christensen, L. (2007). Re-construing the relational-interdependent self-construal and its relationship with self-consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 389–402.
Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2009). Workplace bullying: Causes, consequences and corrections. In P. Lutgen-Sandvik & B. D. Sypher (Eds.), Destructive organizational communication (pp. 41–88). New York: Routledge Press.
Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 467–484.
Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role of stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22(6), 735–753.
Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). Bullying in the workplace: Definition, prevalence, antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Organization and Behavior, 13(2), 202–248.
McHoskey, J. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 267–283.
O’Boyle, E. H, Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.
Omari, M. (2007). Towards dignity and respect at work: An exploration of bullying in the public sector. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.
Pilch, I. (2008). Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and social competence. Are the Machiavellians interpersonally skilled? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39(3), 158–164.
Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 425–441.
Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating, and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232.
Skarżyńska, K. (2005). Czy jesteśmy prorozwojowi? Wartości i przekonania ludzi a dobrobyt i demokratyzacja kraju. In M. Drogosz (Ed.), Jak Polacy przegrywają, jak Polacy wygrywają (pp. 69–93). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/job.1894.
Stewart, A. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). The preference to excel and its relationship to selected personality variables. Journal of Individual Psychology, 62(3), 270–284.
Szcześniak, A. (2006). Kultura organizacyjna polskich przedsiębiorstw. In M. Bąk, P. Kulawczuk, & A. Szcześniak (Eds.), Kultura zatrudnienia w polskich przedsiębiorstwach (pp. 67–75). Warszawa: Instytut Badań nad Demokracją i Przedsiębiorstwem Prywatnym.
Tang, T. L. P., & Chen, Y. J. (2008). Intelligence vs. wisdom: The love of money, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior across college major and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 1–26.
Vartia, M. A.-L. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27(1), 63–69.
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285–299.
Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Individual differences in the acceptability of unethical information technology practices: The case of Machiavellianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 279–301.
Wojciszke, B., & Baryła, W. (2005). Kultura narzekania, czyli o psychicznych pułapkach ekspresji niezadowolenia. In M. Drogosz (Ed.), Jak Polacy przegrywają, jak Polacy wygrywają (pp. 35–53). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Wright, L., & Smye, M. (1998). Corporate abuse. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Zapf, D., & Einarsen, S. (2003). Individual antecedents of bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 165–184). London: Taylor & Francis.
Zapf, D., Escartin, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2010). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace. Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 75–105). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215–237.
Zettler, I., Friedrich, N., & Hiblig, B. E. (2011). Dissecting work commitment: The role of Machiavellianism. Career Development International, 16(1), 20–35.
Zettler, I., & Solga, M. (2013). Not enough of a ‘Dark’ trait? Linking Machiavellianism to job performance. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 545–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pilch, I., Turska, E. Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective. J Bus Ethics 128, 83–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3