Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring Employee Engagement with (Corporate) Social Responsibility: A Social Exchange Perspective on Organisational Participation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a recognised and common part of business activity. Some of the regularly cited motives behind CSR are employee morale, recruitment and retention, with employees acknowledged as a key organisational stakeholder. Despite the significance of employees in relation to CSR, relatively few studies have examined their engagement with CSR and the impediments relevant to this engagement. This exploratory case study-based research addresses this paucity of attention, drawing on one to one interviews and observation in a large UK energy company. A diversity of engagement was found, ranging from employees who exhibited detachment from the CSR activities within the company, to those who were fully engaged with the CSR activities, and to others who were content with their own personal, but not organisational, engagement with CSR. A number of organisational context impediments, including poor communication, a perceived weak and low visibility of CSR culture, and lack of strategic alignment of CSR to business and personal objectives, served to explain this diversity of employee engagement. Social exchange theory is applied to help explore the volition that individual employees have towards their engagement with CSR activities, and to consider the implications of an implicit social, rather than explicit economic, contract between an organisation and its employees in their engagement with CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the s back into corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (2008). First steps in qualitative data analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice, 25(2), 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organization Behavior, 29(2), 147–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T., Colwell, A., & Cunningham, P. H. (2009). The emergence of corporate social responsibility in Chile: The importance of authenticity and social networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. M., & Drumwright, M. E. (2006). Identity identification and relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 34(2), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2003). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., Floyd, L. A., Atkins, R., & Holzgrefe, R. (2012). Ethical duties of organizational citizens: Obligations owed by highly committed employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2009). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Choi, C. J. (2005). A social exchange perspective on business ethics: An application to knowledge and exchange. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Muñoz, G. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2012). How to spot a careerist early on: Psychology and exchange ideology as predictors of careerism. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, M. (2009). Employee participation in CSR and corporate identity: Insights from a disaster-response program in the Asia-Pacific. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In J. Delamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2008). The Oxford book of corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. L. (2008). Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning, 39(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckop, J. R., Cirka, C. C., & Andersson, L. M. (2003). Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behaviour in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanesh, G. S. (2012). The view from within: Internal publics and CSR. Journal of Communication Management, 16(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, F. (2010). Working with corporate social responsibility in Brazilian companies: the role of managers: Values in the maintenance of CSR cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., & Buch, K. (1998). The impact of adopting an ethical approach to employee dismissal during corporate restructuring. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1253–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behaviour as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and fortune: how successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H. (2004). Doing narrative research: Analysing personal stories line by line. Qualitative Social Work, 3(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S., Reynolds, F., & Swain, J. (2001). Practical research: A guide for therapists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Reed Educational and Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, C. A. (1982). Gifts and commodities. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G. A., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaler, J. (2009). An optimally viable version of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., van Dolen, W., & Vock, M. (2010). Trickle effects of cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2007). Moral intelligence: Enhancing business performance and leadership success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manville, B., & Ober, J. (2003). Beyond empowerment: Building a company of citizens. Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). “I need you too!” Corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, E., MacQueen, K. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgements of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P. (2012). Employee engagement and CSR: Transactional, relational and developmental approaches. California Management Review, 54(4), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., Blakey, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, W. (1976). Monies in societies. San Francisco: Chandler and Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M. (2005). Social responsibility and financial performance: Trade-off or virtuous circle? University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1999). Philanthropy’s new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review, 77, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, M. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: the social exchange approach. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support: Leader-member exchange and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standford, L. (2008). Social exchange theories. In L. A Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Sus-Energy (anon) Corporate Social Responsibility Report. (2010).

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turker, D. (2009a). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turker, D. (2009b). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressure, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Durham University Business School, Durham University, Queen’s Campus, D341B Ebsworth Building, University Boulevard, Thornaby, Stockton on Tees, TS17 6BH, UK

    R. E. Slack

  2. Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK

    S. Corlett & R. Morris

Authors
  1. R. E. Slack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Corlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. E. Slack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slack, R.E., Corlett, S. & Morris, R. Exploring Employee Engagement with (Corporate) Social Responsibility: A Social Exchange Perspective on Organisational Participation. J Bus Ethics 127, 537–548 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2057-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2057-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation