It has been suggested that a reporting channel administered by a third-party may represent a stronger procedural safeguard of anonymity and avoids the appearance of impropriety. This study examines whistleblowing intentions among lower-tier employees, specifically examines whether an externally-administered reporting channel increases whistleblowing intentions compared to an internally-administered one. In contrast to the findings of an earlier study by Kaplan et al. (Audit J Pract Theory 28(2):273–288, 2009), our results suggest that whistle-blowing intentions are higher when the reporting channel is administered externally than when it is administered internally. We also find that an externally-administered reporting channel mitigates the negative effect of bystanders on whistleblowing intentions. Implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We replicated the ANOVA omitting the wrongdoer power status × bystander interaction and the three-way interaction as these interactions are not hypothesized. The resulting hypothesis tests and significance levels are nearly identical to those in Table 1. In addition, we performed an ANCOVA with gender as a covariate. Gender is omitted from the analysis as it is not statistically significant.
Advantages to specifying and testing a single multiple mediation model in lieu of separate simple mediation models are: (1) it is possible to determine the significance of a specific mediator, conditional on the presence of other mediators in the model; (2) it is possible to include multiple mediators in one model to allow the test of competing theories; and (3) in a single multiple mediation model, the likelihood of parameter bias due to omitted variables is reduced (Preacher and Hayes 2008).
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2005). Detecting and deterring fraud using hotlines. Continuing-education course . Austin, TX: ACFE.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2008). Report to the nation on occupational fraud and abuse . Austin, TX: ACFE.
Ayers, S., & Kaplan, S. E. (2005). Wrongdoing by consultants: An examination of employees’ reporting intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 121–137.
Brabeck, M. (1984). Ethical characteristics of whistle blowers. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 41–53.
Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74.
Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 291–302.
Cohen, J., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (1998). The effect of gender and academic discipline diversity on the ethical evaluations, ethical intentions and ethical orientation of potential public accounting recruits. Accounting Horizons, 12(3), 250–270.
Cohen, J., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319–336.
Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247–265.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. Law No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1612 (July 21, 2010).
Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 823–836.
Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281–1298.
Ethics Resource Center. (2007). National Business Ethics Survey: An inside view of private sector ethics. Arlington, VA: Ethics Resource Center.
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.
Kaplan, S. E., Pany, K., Samuels, J. A., & Zhang, J. (2008). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 15–30.
Kaplan, S. E., Pany, K., Samuels, J. A., & Zhang, J. (2009). An examination of the effects of procedural safeguards on intentions to anonymously report fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 273–288.
Kaplan, S. E., Pope, K. R., & Samuels, J. A. (2010). The effect of social confrontation on individuals’ intentions to internally report fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 51–67.
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring), 20(1), 45–64.
Kaptein, M. (2011). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 513–530.
Keenan, J. P. (1995). Whistleblowing and the first-level manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(3), 571–584.
King, G. (1999). The implications of an organization’s structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 315–326.
Latané, D., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.
Latané, D., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help me?. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lee, J. Y., Heilmann, S. G., & Near, J. P. (2004). Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Human Relations, 57(3), 297–322.
Lewis, D., & Kender, M. (2010). A survey of whistleblowing/confidential reporting procedures in the top 250 FTSE firms. London: SAI Global.
Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297.
Miceli, M. P., Dozier, J. B., & Near, J. P. (1991a). Blowing the whistle on data fudging: A controlled field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(4), 271–295.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 687–705.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington.
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. ISBN: 978-0-8058-5989-8.
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R. (1991b). Who blows the whistle and why? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(1), 113–130.
Moberly, R. E. (2006). Sarbanes-Oxley’s structural model to encourage corporate whistleblowers. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2006(5), 1107–1180.
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1996). Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22(3), 507–525.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
Piliavin, J. A., & Piliavin, I. M. (1972). Effect of blood on reactions to a victim’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 353–361.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2004). The emerging role of internal audit in mitigating fraud and reputation risks. New York, NY: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Read, W. J., & Rama, D. V. (2003). Whistle-blowing to internal auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 354–362.
Rehg, M. T., Near, J. P., Miceli, M. P., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender difference and power relationships. Organization Science, 19(2), 221–240.
Robinson, S. N., Robertson, J. C., & Curtis, M. B. (2012). The effects of contextual and wrongdoing attributes on organizational employees’ whistleblowing intentions following fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 213–227.
Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2006). Ethical climates and contextual predictors of whistle-blowing. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 216–244.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and Transparency Act of 2002). (2002). PL 107-204, 116 Stat 745.
Schultz, J. J., Jr, Johnson, D. A., Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 31, 75–103.
Schwartz, S. H., & Gottlieb, A. (1976). Bystander reactions to a violent theft: Crime in Jerusalem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(6), 1188–1199.
Schwartz, S. H., & Gottlieb, A. (1980). Bystander anonymity and reactions to emergencies’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 418–430.
Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 15, 707–717.
Sims, R. L., & Keenan, J. P. (1998). Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 411–421.
The Network, Inc. (The Network). (2006, 2010). Corporate Governance and Compliance Hotline Benchmarking Report. Norcross, GA: The Network.
Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. (1999). Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41(2), 131–151.
Vandekerckhove, W., & Lewis, D. (2012). The content of whistleblowing procedures: A critical review of recent official guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 253–264.
Weaver, G. R., & Trevino, L. K. (2001). The role of human resources in ethics/compliance management: A fairness perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 113–134.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41–57.
We are thankful for the valuable comments of participants at the Waterloo 1st Biennial Symposium on Accounting Ethics, the 2012 ABO Meeting in Atlanta, and the 17th Annual Ethics Research Symposium in Washington, DC.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, J., Greenberg, R. & Wong-On-Wing, B. Whistleblowing Intentions of Lower-Level Employees: The Effect of Reporting Channel, Bystanders, and Wrongdoer Power Status. J Bus Ethics 126, 85–99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2008-4
- Bystander effect
- Reporting channel