Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the Impact of an Ethical Framework and an Integrated Ethics Education on Accounting Students’ Ethical Sensitivity and Judgment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is motivated by the criticism levelled at the academic community for its failure to incorporate sufficient ethics education into the accounting curriculum (Earley and Kelly, Issues in Accounting Education 19(1):53–71, 2004; Madison and Schmidt 2006). The inclusion of ethics decision-making frameworks (frameworks) by professional bodies in their codes of conduct (IFAC 2012; APESB 2010) or as a standalone tool (AICPA 2012) and the encouragement of their use as a part of ethics education to help students to identify (ethical sensitivity) and think through ethical issues (ethical judgment) in a business context (AACSB 2004) has been subject to very limited research to date. The aim of this study is to provide evidence of the impact of providing a framework on its own and providing a framework as part of a comprehensive integrated ethics education component of a first-year unit of study, on accounting students’ ethical sensitivity and judgment. Results indicate that providing students with a framework only does not increase students’ ethical sensitivity but does support their ethical judgment. In contrast, the integrated ethics component does increase student’s ethical sensitivity, however, an unexpected finding of this study is that increases in students’ ethical judgement are greater if they have not been previously exposed to the framework. Taken together, our findings suggest that it is the framework that has a significant impact on students’ ethical judgment, while an integrated ethics education can expose students to a range of ethical issues and thereby improve their ethical sensitivity, a critical component which initiates the ethical decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms moral and ethical are considered to be equivalent in this study, and the term ‘ethical’ is used throughout for consistency.

  2. The Ethical Conflict Resolution Process (ECRP) framework (see Appendix 1) used in this study aligns with the first 2 components of Rest’s (1986) model. Ethical sensitivity (steps 1–3 of the ECRP) and ethical judgement (step 5).

  3. The Definition issues test (DIT), which was developed by James Rest, provides a quantitative assessment of moral development based on subjects’ responses to five moral dilemmas. The DIT is in effect an operationalisation of Kohlberg’s (1973) model of moral development as a series of hierarchical cognitive stages.

  4. The undergraduate business/accounting degree in Australia consists of six semesters (24 units). The first-year accounting unit (1 of 4 units undertaken during the semester) consisted of 1 lecture of 1.5 hours per week and 1 seminar/tutorial hour per week. The accounting unit runs for one semester of 13 weeks. The ethics component is integrated as follows:

    In the first 3 weeks of the unit the students are introduced to the ECRP framework, a variety of ethical perspectives and work through practical cases in tutorial classes with their peers and with the support of their instructors. Outside class, the students work on their newspaper task assignment by searching for business–related ethical issues reported in the media. They then work in teams on their ethics case to prepare their team report, team presentation. Students also complete an individual reflection report at the end of the unit. In class, students experience between 5 and 6 team presentations on different business-related ethical issues. There is only one presentation per week for each team until all teams have presented and each team must present on a different case in their class.

  5. The case was reviewed by a number of accounting practitioners as well as a technical expert responsible for the ethical component of Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia CA Program. The case was also reviewed by the lecturer in charge of the subject who was not one of the researchers.

  6. Of the 15 tutorial classes, the ‘no framework’ case was administered to students in eight tutorials. The ‘with framework’ case was administered to students in seven tutorials. Tutorial class sizes varied from 14 to 18 students per class on any given day. Sample sizes are provided in Table 1.

  7. TOTAL 10 MARKS were allocated as follows:

    Environmental: identify ethical issue (1 mark), recommendation (2 marks), justification (2 marks) SUB TOTAL 5;

    Human rights: identify ethical issue (1 mark), recommendation (2 marks), justification (2 marks) SUB TOTAL 5.

References

  • Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board (APESB). (2010). APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board. Retrieved from http://www.apesb.org.au/attachments/1-APES%20110%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20for%20Professional%20Accountants%20December%202010%20-%20Final.pdf.

  • American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). (2002). Ethics Decision Tree for CPAs in Business and Industry. Retrieved from http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Resources/EthicsEnforcement/DownloadableDocuments/decision_tree_bai.pdf.

  • American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). (2012). Code of Professional Conduct and Bylaws. Retrieved April 21, 2013 from http://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/CodeofConduct/DownloadableDocuments/2012June1CodeOfProfessionalConduct.pdf.

  • Armstrong, M. B. (1993). Ethics and professionalism in accounting education: A sample course. Journal of Accounting Education, 11(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International (AACSB). (2004). Ethics Education in Business Schools: Report of the Ethics Education Task force to AACSB International’s Board of Directors. St. Louis, MO: AACSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R. (1995). Ethics research in accounting: A note on using the defining issues test. The Accounting Review, 7(2), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanthorne, C., Kovar, S. E., & Fisher, D. G. (2007). Accounting educators’ opinions about ethics in the curriculum: An extensive view. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 355–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, P., & Smythe, V. (2008). Theories on teaching & training in ethics. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. Y. S., & Leung, P. (2006). The effects of accounting students’ ethical reasoning & personal factors on their ethical sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 436–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, P. A., & Selverajan, T. T. (2010). Can ethics education improve ethical judgment? An empirical study. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 75(4), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2006). The applicability of a contingent factors model to accounting ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B. J., Leung, P., Dellaportas, D., Jackling, B., & Wong, G. (2008). Ethics education for accounting students: A toolkit approach. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17(4), 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P. (1997). Methods in behavioral research (6th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaportas, S. (2006). Making a difference with a discrete course on accounting ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, C. E., & Kelly, P. T. (2004). A note on ethics educational interventions in an undergraduate auditing course: Is there an “Enron Effect”? Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, E., & Sims, R. (2005). Teaching business ethics: Targeted outputs. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J., & Clarke, K. (2007). Beyond a code of professional ethics: A holistic model of ethical decision-making for accountants. Abacus, 43(4), 488–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, W. E., & Cargile, B. R. (1987). Ethical perceptions of accounting students: Does exposure to a code of professional ethics help? Issues in Accounting Education, 2(2), 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari, F., Kyriacou, O., & Brennan, R. (2008). Exploring the implementation of ethics in U.K. accounting programs. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 2255–2274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & Weber, J. (1997). Influencing ethical development: exposing students to the AICPA code of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(8), 777–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2006). Approaches to the Development and Maintenance of Professional Values, Ethics and Attitudes in Accounting Education Programs. Retrieved November 5, 2012, from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/approaches-to-the-developme.pdf.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2007). International Education Practice Statement 1 (IEPS1): Approaches to Developing and Maintaining Professional Values, Ethics and Attitudes. Retrieved April 21, 2013 from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/ieps-1-approaches-to-deve.pdf.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2008). International Education Standards (IES 4): Professional Values, Ethics and Attitudes. Retrieved November 5, 2012, from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/ies-4-professional-values-1.pdf.

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2012). Handbook of Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. Retrieved April 21, 2013 from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/2012-IESBA-Handbook.pdf.

  • Jackling, B., Cooper, B. J., Leung, P., & Dellaportas, S. (2007). Professional accounting bodies’ perceptions of ethical issues, causes of ethical failure and ethics education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(9), 928–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. M. (2004). Incorporating ethics and professionalism into accounting education and research: A discussion of the voids and advocacy for training in seminal works in business ethics. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organisations: An issue-contingent model. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Massey, D., & Thorne, L. (2003). Auditors’ ethical reasoning: Insights from past research and implications for the future. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and Sequences: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. L. L. (2010). A step forward: Ethics education matters! Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 565–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, R. L., & Schmidt, J. J. (2006). Survey of time devoted to ethics in accountancy programs in North American colleges and universities. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M. (2004). A case example: Integrating ethics into the academic business curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, L., & Subramaniam, N. (2009). Ethical evaluations and behavioural intentions of early career accountants: the impact of mentors, peers and individual attributes. Accounting and Finance, 49(3), 619–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melè, D. (2005). Ethical education in accounting: Integrating rules, values and virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintchik, N. M., & Farmer, T. A. (2009). Associations between epistemological beliefs and moral reasoning: Evidence from accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneaux, D. (2004). After Andersen: An experience of integrating ethics into undergraduate accountancy education. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. (1994). Computerised content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages and limitations. Journal of Management, 20(4), 903–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, C. (2009). An empirical analysis of the positive impact of ethics teaching on accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(4–5), 505–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdogan, F. B., & Eser, Z. (2007). Ethical sensitivity of college students in a developing country: Do demographic factors matter? Journal of Teaching in International Business, 19(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A., Taylor, P., & Petocz, P. (2011). Business as usual: Business students’ conceptions of ethics. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., & Narváez, D. (Eds.). (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Felton, E. (2006). Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K., Felicetti, L., & Kuehn, S. (1996). The attitudes of business majors toward the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 913–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L. (2004). The buck stops here: Why universities must reclaim business ethics education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L. (2005). Business ethics education at bay: Addressing a crisis of legitimacy. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(3), 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L. (2001). Refocusing ethics education in accounting: An examination of accounting students’ tendency to use their cognitive moral capability. Journal of Accounting Education, 19(2), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welton, R. E., & Guffey, D. M. (2009). Transitory or persistent? The effects of classroom ethics interventions: A longitudinal study. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 18(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge The University of Sydney, Business School, Special Research Grant Scheme, for the funding support on this project. We would also like to acknowledge Linda English, staff in the discipline of accounting (in particular, Trish Strong), and the University of Sydney Learning Centre (in particular, Helen Drury) for their input into the introduction and ongoing development of ethics programme explored in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nonna Martinov-Bennie.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Ethical Conflict Resolution Process (ECRP) Framework

1.

Introduction

• Provide a brief overview to contextualise the potential accounting and ethical issue(s)

• Provide a succinct summary to indicate that you understand the relevant facts

2.

Identify the relevant accounting and ethical issues in the context of your chosen article

• Accounting issues: identify the relevant accounting issues, show that you understand the impact on financial reports and on decision making by external and internal stakeholders (Keep in mind that financial statements determine how outsiders view a company)

• Ethical issues: briefly outline all potential ethical issues

3.

Identify stakeholders

• Identify the key stakeholders and outline the potential impact of the ethical issues on each stakeholder’s interests (specify who is affected by the ethical conflict identified and how this is likely to impact their decision making/actions. Consider the potential impact on internal and external stakeholders such as consumers, competitors, or society in general)

• Indicate whether there are any potential conflicts of interests that could influence how the ethical issue is reported and/or resolved (i.e. the interaction between stakeholders)

4.

Outline ethical perspectives

• Identify at least 3 alternative ethical perspectives that could be adopted to assist in the conflict resolution process.

• Identify the ethical perspectives that appear to have been adopted by the key stakeholders.

• After considering the points above, identify your own ethical perspective(s) in the context of the ethical issue(s) discussed (ensuring it is appropriately applied and argued based on evidence using examples)

5.

Alternative courses of action and recommendation

• Identify the most important possible alternative courses of action.

• Recommend an appropriate course of action and justify your choice (i.e. ensure the team’s recommendations are consistent with the ethical perspective(s) applied)

  1. Source Adapted and modified version of the Ethical Conflict Resolution Process from APESB.110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants: http://www.apesb.org.au/APES_110.pdf

Appendix 2: The Ethical Case (Same for all Pre-test and Post-test Conditions)

Your friend Angela, who recently completed her Bachelor of Business, has been employed by Energy Limited (Energy) in the head office accounting department for the last 12 months. Energy is a publicly listed company supplying gas, electricity and coal to over one million retail and wholesale customers throughout Australia.

Energy’s strategy is to boost its profitability and market share by being the lowest cost producer of energy for consumers. A range of measures, such as the use of effluent holding ponds near residential sites and transfer of component manufacturing to less developed countries, have been used to deliver cost savings.

Angela has recently come across documents that one of the effluent ponds started leaking a known carcinogenic compound into the ground water 6 months ago. The company has kept this information confidential and aggressively purchased and bulldozed all housing (at market price) in the local area. Angela is also aware that Energy is receiving subsidies from the government for the use of local labour for component manufacture, under an ‘Export Expertise, Not Jobs’ programme although it does not employ local labour for component manufacture.

Appendix 3: Pre-test and Post-test Conditions

Pre-test Condition with ECRP Framework

Required.

From the background material provided above:

  1. (a)

    summarise the relevant facts;

  2. (b)

    identify and explain the possible accounting issue(s);

  3. (c)

    identify and explain the possible ethical issue(s);

  4. (d)

    identify the key stakeholders affected; and

  5. (e)

    assuming you are Angela, identify all possible alternative course(s) of action she could take and recommend what you consider to be the most appropriate course of action. Justify your choice.

Pre-test Condition with No ECRP Framework

Required.

Assuming you are Angela, evaluate this situation and recommend what you consider to be the most appropriate course of action. Justify your choice.

Post-test Condition

Required.

Assuming you are Angela, use the Ethical Conflict Resolution Process to evaluate this situation and recommend what you consider to be the most appropriate course of action. Justify your choice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinov-Bennie, N., Mladenovic, R. Investigation of the Impact of an Ethical Framework and an Integrated Ethics Education on Accounting Students’ Ethical Sensitivity and Judgment. J Bus Ethics 127, 189–203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2007-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2007-5

Keywords

Navigation