Abstract
In this conceptual paper we argue that, to date, principles of responsible management have not impacted practice as anticipated because of a disconnect between knowledge and practice. This disconnect means that an awareness of ethical concerns, by itself, does not help students take personal responsibility for their actions. We suggest that an abstract knowledge of principles has to be supplemented by an engaged understanding of the responsibility of managers and leaders to actively challenge irresponsible practices. We argue that a form of moral reflexive practice drawing on an understanding of threshold concepts is central to responsible management, and provides a gateway to transformative learning. Our conceptual argument leads to implications for management and professional education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example: critical perspectives on leadership and teamwork, along with particular critical lenses (such as feminism) through which any aspect of organizational life could be viewed differently.
The knowledge–practice disconnect is not limited to corporate or social responsibility issues: see Baldwin et al. (2011).
We follow Gunia et al (2012, p. 14) in understanding ethical to be an evaluative term “…to describe decisions that are normatively appropriate (with its opposite being “unethical”)”, although we recognize that what is regarded as normative is socially constructed and varies with time and community (as do Lange and Washburn 2012). Moreover, we also recognize that there are always outlier individuals who are quite content to behave irresponsibly without regard to others. Nevertheless we are encouraged by Gunia’s et al (2012) results, which indicate that for most people this is not the case.
References
Adams, M. (2003). The reflexive self and culture: A critique. British Journal of Sociology, 54, 221–238.
Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity? Sociology, 40, 511–528.
Adler, N. (2011). Leading beautifully: The creative economy and beyond. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 208–221.
Alcaraz, J. M., & Thiruvattal, E. (2010). An interview with Manuel Escudero: The United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 542–550.
Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arvay, M. (2003). Doing reflexivity: a collaborative, narrative approach. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), reflexivity (pp. 163–175). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ashcraft, K. L., & Allen, B. J. (2009). Politics even closer to home: Repositioning CME from the standpoint of communication studies. Management Learning, 40, 11–30.
Baldwin, T. T., Pierce, J. R., Joines, R. C., & Farouk, S. (2011). The elusiveness of applied management knowledge: A critical challenge for management educators. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10, 583–605.
Bell, E. (2010). The elephant in the room: Critical management studies as a sight of body pedagogics. Management Learning, 41, 429–442.
Blackman, D., Kennedy, M., & Quazi, A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and individual resistance: Learning as the missing link in implementation. Management Learning,. doi:10.1177/1350507612444392. online early, accessed May 4 2013.
Bleakley, A. (1999). From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 315–330.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.
Champoux, J. E. (2006). At the cinema: Aspiring to a higher ethical standard. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 386–390.
Cousins, G. (2006). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and emotional capital: an exploration into learning about others. In J. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.
Cunliffe, A. (2002a). Social poetics and management inquiry: a dialogic approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 128–146.
Cunliffe, A. (2002b). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33, 35–61.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56, 983–1003.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407–426.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40, 87–101.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about management (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.
Doane, G. (2003). Reflexivity as presence: A journey of self enquiry. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity (pp. 93–102). Oxford: Blackwell.
Doh, J. P., & Stumpf, S. A. (2005). Towards a framework of responsible leadership and governance. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business (pp. 3–18). Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Easterby-Smith, M., & Malina, D. (1999). Cross-cultural collaborative research: Toward reflexivity. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 76–86.
Elliot, C. (2008). Emancipating assessment: assessment assumptions and critical alternatives in an experience-based programme. Management Learning, 39, 271–293.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297–324.
Gabriel, Y., & Connell, N. A. D. (2010). Co-creating stories: Collaborative experiments in storytelling. Management Learning, 41, 507–523.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Malden: Polity Press.
Garrety, K. H. (2008). Organisational control and the self: Critiques and normative expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 93–106.
Giacalone, R., & Thompson, K. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 266–277.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership affect and emotions: A state of the science review. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 979–1004.
Gunia, B., Wang, L., Huang, L., Wang, J., & Murnighan, J. (2012). Contemplation and conversation: Subtle influences on moral decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 13–33.
Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. (1997). Reflexivity without relativism: Reflexivity in post-paradigm organization studies. British Journal of Management, 8, S5–S17.
Hartman, E. (2006). Can we teach character? An Aristotelian answer. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 68–81.
Hibbert, P., Coupland, C., & MacIntosh, R. (2010). Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5(1), 47–62.
Lange, D., & Washburn, N. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300–326.
Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329–343.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.
Mack, K. (2012). Taking an aesthetic risk in management education: Reflections on an artistic-aesthetic approach. Management Learning,. doi:10.1177/1350507612443209. Accessed 5.7.2012.
Malkki, K., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2012). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges between higher education teachers’ thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 33–50.
McCormick, R. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Some reflections on the nature of learning and knowledge. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 51–58). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: theory and practice—ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006a). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 19–32). London: Routledge.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006b). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: an introduction. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 3–18). Routledge: Sense Publishers.
Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Davies, P. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 59–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506–522.
Myers, K. (2010). Reflexive practice: Professional thinking for a turbulent world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Osiemo, L.B. (2012). Developing responsible leaders: The university at the service of the person. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 131–143.
Painter-Morland, M. (2006). Redefining accountability as relational responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 89–98.
Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). Williamsburg: Sense Publishers.
Perkins, D. (2008). Beyond understanding. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Petrick, J. A., Cragg, W., & Sañudo, M. (2011). Business ethics in North America: Trends and challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 51–62.
Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 3–13.
Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service learning programs: The Ulysses experience at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 237–260.
Segal, S. (2011). A Heideggerian perspective on the relationship between Mintzberg’s distinction between engaged and disconnected management: The role of uncertainty in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 469–483.
Shotter, J. (2005). Inside the moment of managing: Wittgenstein and the everyday dynamics of our expressive-responsive activities. Organization Studies, 26(1), 113–135.
Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: an argument for ‘withness’ thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4), 585–604.
Sinclair, A. (2007). Teaching leadership critically to MBAs: experiences from heaven and hell. Management Learning, 38, 458–472.
Solbrekke, T. D., & Englund, T. (2011). Bringing professional responsibility back in. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 847–861.
Taylor, C. (2011). More than meets the eye: the use of videonarratives to facilitate doctoral student reflexivity on their doctoral journeys. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 441–458.
Trafford, V. (2008). Conceptual frameworks as a threshold concept in doctorateness. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 273–288). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Van Gennep, A. (2004). The rites of passage. London: Routledge.
Vince, R. (2011). The spatial psychodynamics of management learning. Management Learning, 42, 333–347.
Wilson, A. (2007). Rising to the challenge: How to develop responsible leaders. Leadership in Action, 27, 7–11.
Yip, J., & Raelin, J. A. (2011). Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning, 43, 333–354.
Ziegenfuss, J. T, Jr. (2010). Building reflexive practice in education. In K. Myers (Ed.), Reflexive practice: Professional thinking for a turbulent world (pp. 189–198). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hibbert, P., Cunliffe, A. Responsible Management: Engaging Moral Reflexive Practice Through Threshold Concepts. J Bus Ethics 127, 177–188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7