Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 329–348 | Cite as

Money is Power: Monetary Intelligence—Love of Money and Temptation of Materialism Among Czech University Students

  • Soňa Lemrová
  • Eva Reiterová
  • Renáta Fatěnová
  • Karel Lemr
  • Thomas Li-Ping Tang


In this study, we develop a theoretical model of monetary intelligence (MI), explore the extent to which individuals’ meaning of money is related to the pursuit of materialistic purposes, and test our model using the whole sample and across college major and gender. We select the 15-item love of money (LOM) construct—Factors Good, Evil (Affective), Budget (Behavioral), Achievement, and Power (Cognitive)—from the Money Ethic Scale and Factors Success and Centrality and two indicators—from the Materialism Scale. Based on our data collected from 330 university students in Czech Republic, we provide the following findings. First, our formative models are superior to our reflective models. Second, for the reflective model, money represents Power, Good, Achievement, and not Evil, in the context of materialism. Our formative model suggests that those who pursuit materialism cherish Achievement (vanity) but Budget their money poorly. Third, multi-group analyses illustrate that humanities students (62.4 % female) consider money as Evil and Budget their money poorly, while those in natural sciences (37.6 % female) do not. Further, men are obsessed with Achievement, whereas women do not Budget their money properly, suggesting reflective temptation for males and impulsive temptation for females. Our novel discoveries shed new lights on the relationships between LOM and materialism and offer practical implications to the field of consumer behavior and business ethics.


Meaning of money Monetary intelligence Love of money (LOM) Materialism Power Budget Achievement Vanity Reflective-impulsive temptation Gender College major Czech Republic 


  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
  2. Arndt, J., Solomon, S., Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). The urge to splurge: A terror management account of materialism and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 198–212.Google Scholar
  3. Associated Press. (2006, January 30). U.S. savings rate hits lowest level since 1933: Consumers depleting savings to buy cars, other big-ticket items.
  4. Astin, A. W. (1998). The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966–1996. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 115–135.Google Scholar
  5. Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2006). “When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping”: An examination of self-gifting behavior. In C. Pechmann & L. Price (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 33, pp. 259–260). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  6. Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2011). Retail therapy: A strategic effort to improve mode. Psychology & Marketing, 28(6), 638–659.Google Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., Tybout, A. M., Craig, C. S., & Sternthal, B. (1979). The contrast validity of the tripartite classification of attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 88–95.Google Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.Google Scholar
  9. Baumeister, R. F., Sparks, E. A., Stillman, T. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2008). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
  10. Belk, R. W. (1984). 3 scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 291–297.Google Scholar
  11. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
  12. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of crosscultural psychology (Vol. 2, Methodology, pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, Y. J., & Tang, T. L. P. (2013). The bright and dark side of religiosity among university students: Do gender, college major, and income matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 531–553.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, J. Q., Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, N. Y. (2013). Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2.
  15. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  16. Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: A self-regulatory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 913–934.Google Scholar
  17. Christopher, A. N., Marek, P., & Carroll, S. M. (2004). Materialism and attitudes toward money: An exploratory investigation. Individual Differences Research, 2(2), 109–117.Google Scholar
  18. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  19. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1281–1303.Google Scholar
  20. Deckop, J. R., Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Giacalone, R. A. (2010). Effects of materialism on work-related personal well-being. Human Relations, 63(7), 1007–1030.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276.Google Scholar
  24. Dittmar, H. (2005). Compulsive buying—A growing concern? An examination of gender, age, and endorsement of materialistic values as predictors. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 467–491.Google Scholar
  25. Dittmar, H., Beattie, J., & Friese, S. (1995). Gender identity and material symbols: Objects and decision considerations in impulsive purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(3), 491–511.Google Scholar
  26. Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image—Is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(2), 109–142.Google Scholar
  27. Dittmar, H., & Pepper, L. (1994). To have is to be: Materialism and person perception in working-class and middle-class British adolescents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 233–251.Google Scholar
  28. Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn't make you happy, then you probably aren't spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 115–125.Google Scholar
  29. Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. M. (1991). Private materialism, personal self-fulfillment, family life, and public interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(4), 499–533.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 370–388.Google Scholar
  31. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174.Google Scholar
  32. Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262–280.Google Scholar
  33. Furnham, A. (1984). Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 501–509.Google Scholar
  34. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Garðarsdóttir, R. B., & Dittmar, H. (2012). The relationship of materialism to debt and financial well-being: The case of Iceland’s perceived prosperity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 471–481.Google Scholar
  36. Gbadamosi, G., & Joubert, P. (2005). Money ethic, moral conduct and work related attitudes: Field study from the public sector in Swaziland. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 754–763.Google Scholar
  37. Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
  38. Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203.Google Scholar
  39. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921–955.Google Scholar
  40. Green, K. C. (1989). A profile of undergraduates in the sciences. American Scientist, 77(5), 475–481.Google Scholar
  41. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystorm, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.Google Scholar
  42. Griffin, M., Babin, B. J., & Christensen, F. (2004). A cross-cultural investigation of the materialism construct: Assessing the Richins and Dawson’s materialism scale in Denmark, France and Russia. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 893–900.Google Scholar
  43. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176.Google Scholar
  44. Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Li, N., & Shen, L. X. (2009). Wealth, warmth, and well-being: Whether happiness is relative or absolute depends on whether it is about money, acquisition, or consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 396–409.Google Scholar
  45. Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Cai, C. F., & Zhang, S. (2013). Overearning. Psychological Science, 24(6), 852–859.Google Scholar
  46. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  47. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.Google Scholar
  48. Jia, S. W., Zhang, W. X., Li, P., Feng, T. Y., & Li, H. (2013). Attitude toward money modulates outcome processing: An ERP study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 43–51.Google Scholar
  49. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506.Google Scholar
  50. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.Google Scholar
  51. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American-dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.Google Scholar
  52. King, N. (2013, August 29). Obamacare plan shows popularity of prepaid debit cards. NPR: Marketplace.Google Scholar
  53. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.Google Scholar
  54. Kment, P., & Kocmankova, L. (2012). Rural and environmental concern: Focus on the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika, 58(4), 191–199.Google Scholar
  55. Ku, L., Dittmar, H., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Are materialistic teenagers less motivated to learn? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 74–86.Google Scholar
  56. Lea, S. E. G., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161–209.Google Scholar
  57. Leonard, D. (2010, August 2–8). The new abnormal: Americans are broke and depressed—And also swilling $3 lattes and waiting on line for iPhones. Welcome to the schizophrenic economy. Bloomberg Business Week, 50–55.Google Scholar
  58. Liao, J. Q., & Wang, L. (2008). Relationship between material value, money attitude and pay satisfaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
  59. Lim, V. K. G., & Teo, T. S. H. (1997). Sex, money and financial hardship: An empirical study of attitudes towards money among undergraduates in Singapore. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 369–386.Google Scholar
  60. Locke, E. A. (2013, August 9–13). Can money buy happiness? Paper presented at Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida.Google Scholar
  61. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.Google Scholar
  62. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.Google Scholar
  63. McClelland, D. C. (1967). Money as a motivator: Some research insights. The McKinsey Quarterly, 10–21.Google Scholar
  64. McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  65. Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., & Ariely, D. (2009). Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 594–597.Google Scholar
  66. Merritt, J. (2006, October 23). The best B-schools. Business Week, 54–75.Google Scholar
  67. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.Google Scholar
  68. Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106–119.Google Scholar
  69. Mickel, A. E., & Barron, L. A. (2008). Getting “More Bang for the Buck”: Symbolic value of monetary rewards in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 329–338.Google Scholar
  70. Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation (11th ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  71. Mitchell, T. R., & Mickel, A. E. (1999). The meaning of money: An individual difference perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 568–578.Google Scholar
  72. Mueller, A., Claes, L., Mitchell, J. E., Faber, R. J., Fischer, J., & de Zwaan, M. (2011). Does compulsive buying differ between male and female students? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1309–1312.Google Scholar
  73. Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Omagor, C., Mpamizo, B., & Ntayi, J. M. (2011). The love of money, pressure to perform and unethical marketing behavior in the cosmetic industry in Uganda. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(4), 40–49.Google Scholar
  74. Nnedum, O. A. U., Egwu, E. U., Obinna, E. J., Ntomchukwu, M. S., & Chukwukeluo, C. B. (2011). Materialism and meaning of money (MOM): Validation of Money Metaphor Scale (MMS) in South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance & Economics, 76, 31–46.Google Scholar
  75. Nolte, M. (2013, August 4). Homily of Sunday Mass. Associate Pastor of St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church. Murfreesboro, TN.Google Scholar
  76. O’Reilly, C. A., Main, B. G., & Crystal, G. S. (1988). CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  77. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.Google Scholar
  78. Rabusic, L. (2000). Is Czech society ‘post-materialist’? Sociologicky Casopis, 36(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  79. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.Google Scholar
  80. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.Google Scholar
  81. Rubenstein, C. (1981). Money and self-esteem, relationships, secrecy, envy, satisfaction. Psychology Today, 15(5), 29–44.Google Scholar
  82. Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (Eds.). (2000). Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  83. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. CESifo Group, Munich, CESifo Working Paper Series: 2106.
  84. Sappenfield, M. (2013, September 8). Homily of Sunday Mass. Pastor of St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church, Murfreesboro, TN. (also 2012, June 17).Google Scholar
  85. Schnieder, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747–773.Google Scholar
  86. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Lee, D. J., Nisius, A. M., & Yu, G. B. (2013). The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 183–191.Google Scholar
  87. Smith, A. (1776/1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, N. (2013, April 3). When the going gets tough, Americans go shopping. Business Daily. Accessed on July 28, 2013.
  89. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.Google Scholar
  90. Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: It’s not the money, it’s the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 959–971.Google Scholar
  91. Tang, T. L. P. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 197–202.Google Scholar
  92. Tang, T. L. P. (1993). The meaning of money: Extension and exploration of the money ethic scale in a sample of university students in Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 93–99.Google Scholar
  93. Tang, T. L. P. (1995). The development of a short Money Ethic Scale: Attitudes toward money and pay satisfaction revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(6), 809–817.Google Scholar
  94. Tang, T. L. P. (1996). Pay differentials as a function of rater’s sex, money ethic, and job incumbent’s sex: A test of the Matthew Effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 127–144.Google Scholar
  95. Tang, T. L. P. (2007). Income and quality of life: Does the love of money make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 375–393.Google Scholar
  96. Tang, T. L. P., & Chen, Y. J. (2008). Intelligence vs. wisdom: The love of money, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior across college major and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 1–26.Google Scholar
  97. Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong managers? Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 13–30.Google Scholar
  98. Tang, T. L. P., Cunningham, P. H., Frauman, E., Ivy, M. I., & Perry, T. L. (2012). Attitudes and occupational commitment among public personnel: Differences between baby boomers and Gen-Xers. Public Personnel Management, 41(2), 327–360.Google Scholar
  99. Tang, T. L. P., & Gilbert, P. R. (1995). Attitudes toward money as related to intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, stress and work-related attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 327–332.Google Scholar
  100. Tang, T. L. P., Kim, J. K., & Tang, D. S. H. (2000). Does attitude toward money moderate the relationship between intrinsic job satisfaction and voluntary turnover? Human Relations, 53(2), 213–245.Google Scholar
  101. Tang, T. L. P., & Liu, H. (2012). Love of money and unethical behavior intention: Does an authentic supervisor’s personal integrity and character (ASPIRE) make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 295–312.Google Scholar
  102. Tang, T. L. P., Luna-Arocas, R., Quintanilla Pardo, I., & Tang, T. L. N. (2012). Materialism and the bright and dark sides of the financial dream in Spain: The positive role of money attitudes—The Matthew Effect. Applied Psychology: An International Review. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00533.x.
  103. Tang, T. L. P., Luna-Arocas, R., & Sutarso, T. (2005). From income to pay satisfaction: The love of money and pay equity comparison as mediators and culture (the United States and Spain) and gender as moderators. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 3(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  104. Tang, T. L. P., Luna-Arocas, R., & Whiteside, H. D. (2003). Money ethic endorsement, self-reported income, and life satisfaction: University faculty in the US and Spain. Personnel Review, 32(6), 756–773.Google Scholar
  105. Tang, T. L. P., & Sutarso, T. (2013). Falling or not falling into temptation? Multiple faces of temptation, monetary intelligence, and unethical intentions across gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 529–552.Google Scholar
  106. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Akande, A., Allen, M. W., Alzubaidi, A. S., Ansari, M. A.,… Vlerick, P. (2006). The love of money and pay level satisfaction: Measurement and functional equivalence in 29 geographical entities around the world. Management and Organization Review, 2, 423–452.Google Scholar
  107. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicai, F.,… Manganelli, A. M. (2011). The love of money is the root of all evil: Pay satisfaction and CPI as moderators. In L. A. Toombs (Ed.), Best paper proceedings of the Academy of Management. Google Scholar
  108. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicai, F., …Chen, J. Q. (2013, August 9–13). Are money smart people satisfied with pay and life? A theory of monetary intelligence. Paper presented at academy of management annual meeting, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida.Google Scholar
  109. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Davis, G. M. T., Dolinski, D., Ibrahim, A. H. S., & Wagner, S. L. (2008). To help or not to help? The Good Samaritan Effect and the love of money on helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 865–887.Google Scholar
  110. Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, T. L. N. (2010). Finding the lost sheep: A panel study of business students’ intrinsic religiosity, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior intention in a public institution. Ethics and Behavior, 20(5), 352–379.Google Scholar
  111. Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, T. L. N. (2012). The love of money, pay satisfaction, and academic tenure: Professors in a public institution of higher education. Public Personnel Management, 41(1), 97–126.Google Scholar
  112. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–735.Google Scholar
  113. The Daily Record. (2003, April 5). Commentary: Education, ethics, and sentences for Enronizing financial reports, Baltimore, MD, p. 1.Google Scholar
  114. Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  115. Trojsi, J. D., Christopher, A. N., & Marek, P. (2006). Materialism and money spending disposition as predictors of economic and personality variables. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(3), 421–436.Google Scholar
  116. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.Google Scholar
  117. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2006). The role of money and religiosity in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 117–124.Google Scholar
  118. Watson, J. J. (2003). The relationship of materialism to spending tendencies, saving, and debt. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(6), 723–739.Google Scholar
  119. Wong, H. M. (2008). Religiousness, love of money, and ethical attitudes of Malaysian evangelical Christians in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 169–191.Google Scholar
  120. Wu, W. C., & Huan, T. C. (2010). The effect of purchasing situation and conformity behavior on young students’ impulse buying. African Journal of Business Management, 4(16), 3530–3540.Google Scholar
  121. Yamauchi, K. T., & Templer, D. I. (1982). The development of a money attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(5), 522–528.Google Scholar
  122. Yang, Q., Wu, X. C., Zhou, X. Y., Mead, N. L., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 473–489.Google Scholar
  123. Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The social meaning of money: Special monies. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 342–377.Google Scholar
  124. Zhang, L. Q. (2009). An exchange theory of money and self-esteem in decision making. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 66–76.Google Scholar
  125. Zhou, X. Y., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soňa Lemrová
    • 1
  • Eva Reiterová
    • 1
  • Renáta Fatěnová
    • 1
  • Karel Lemr
    • 2
  • Thomas Li-Ping Tang
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPalacký University, OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.RCPTM, Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacký University and Institute of Physics of Czech Academy of Sciences, Faculty of SciencePalacký University, OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Management and Marketing, Jennings A. Jones College of BusinessMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations