Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 124, Issue 4, pp 695–711 | Cite as

Unpacking the Goal Congruence–Organizational Deviance Relationship: The Roles of Work Engagement and Emotional Intelligence

  • Dirk De ClercqEmail author
  • Dave Bouckenooghe
  • Usman Raja
  • Ganna Matsyborska
Article

Abstract

Drawing from research on person–organization fit, work engagement, and emotional intelligence, this study investigates the mediating role of work engagement in the link between goal congruence and organizational deviance, as well as how this mediating effect might be moderated by emotional intelligence. Data captured from 272 employees of four IT companies show that the goal congruence between employees and their supervisor negatively affects the former’s organizational deviance, though this effect disappears when controlling for the intermediate role of work engagement. Further, emotional intelligence moderates both the positive relationship between goal congruence and work engagement and the negative relationship between work engagement and organizational deviance, such that these relationships become invigorated at higher levels of emotional intelligence. The findings also reveal that the indirect effect of goal congruence on organizational deviance through work engagement is more pronounced at higher levels of emotional intelligence, which offers evidence of moderated mediation. These findings have significant implications for research and practice.

Keywords

Organizational deviance Goal congruence Work engagement Emotional intelligence Moderated mediation 

References

  1. Adkins, C. L., Russell, C. J., & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Judgments of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 605–623.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. R. (2004). Morality and ethics in theory and practice. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.Google Scholar
  6. Angelidis, J., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2011). The impact of emotional intelligence on the ethical judgment of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 111–119.Google Scholar
  7. Avey, J. B., Palanski, M. E., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). When leadership goes unnoticed. The moderating role of follower self-esteem on the relationship between ethical leadership and follower behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 573–582.Google Scholar
  8. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48–70.Google Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 161, 74–94.Google Scholar
  10. Bakker, A. B. (2009). Building engagement in the workplace. In C. Cooper & R. Burke (Eds.), The peak performing organization (pp. 50–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4–28.Google Scholar
  12. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.Google Scholar
  13. Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2009). Advancements in crossover theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 206–219.Google Scholar
  14. Balducci, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Fraccaroli, F. (2011). The job demands-resources model and counterproductive work behavior: The role of job-related affect. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(4), 467–496.Google Scholar
  15. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  16. Bechtold, M. N., Welk, C., Hartig, J., & Zapf, D. (2007). Main and moderating effects of self-control, organizational justice, and emotional labour on counterproductive behavior at work. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 479–500.Google Scholar
  17. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.Google Scholar
  18. Billsberry, J., Ambrosini, V., Moss-Jones, J., & Marsh, P. (2005). Some suggestions for mapping organizational members, sense of fit. Journal of Business & Psychology, 19(4), 555–570.Google Scholar
  19. Biron, M. (2010). Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Human Relations, 63(6), 875–897.Google Scholar
  20. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Bordia, P., Restugbog, S. L. D., & Tang, R. L. (2008). When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1104–1117.Google Scholar
  22. Brackett, M. A., Lopes, P. N., Ivcevic, Z., Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (2004). Integrating emotion and cognition: The role of emotional intelligence. In D. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrating perspectives on intellectual functioning (pp. 175–194). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.Google Scholar
  24. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J. P., Tyler, T., & Martin, C. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558–583.Google Scholar
  25. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884.Google Scholar
  26. Cangemi, J. P., Burga, B., Lazarus, H., Miller, R. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). The real work of the leader: A focus on the human side of the equation. Journal of Management Development, 27(10), 1026–1036.Google Scholar
  27. Carmeli, A. (2003). The relationship between emotional intelligence and work attitudes, behavior and outcomes: An examination among senior managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(7/8), 788–813.Google Scholar
  28. Cherniss, G., & Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Choi, J., Sung, S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, D.-S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 107–124.Google Scholar
  30. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.Google Scholar
  31. Clarke, N. (2010). Developing emotional intelligence abilities through team-based learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(2), 119–138.Google Scholar
  32. Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 599–609.Google Scholar
  33. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.Google Scholar
  34. Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional intelligence, in search of an exclusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989–1015.Google Scholar
  35. Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2004). Using an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group citizenship behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1443–1458.Google Scholar
  36. De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2011). A closer look at cross-functional collaboration and product innovativeness: Contingency effects of structural and relational context. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(5), 680–699.Google Scholar
  37. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., De Jonge, J., Janssen, P. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27(4), 279–286.Google Scholar
  38. Devonish, D., & Greenidge, D. (2010). The effect of organizational justice on contextual performance, counterproductive work behaviors, and task performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability-based emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 75–86.Google Scholar
  39. Duran, M. A., N. Extremera, & L. Rey. (2010). Analyzing the contribution of emotional intelligence and core self-evaluations as personal resources to employee engagement. In Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, research and practice (pp. 209–217). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. A. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654–677.Google Scholar
  41. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.Google Scholar
  42. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.Google Scholar
  43. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192.Google Scholar
  44. Glasser, W. (1985). Control theory: A new explanation of how we control our lives. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  45. Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 92–102.Google Scholar
  46. Gonzalez-Roma, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: independent factors or opposite poles?’. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165–174.Google Scholar
  47. Gooty, J., Gavin, M., & Ashkanasy, N. (2009). Emotions research in OB: The challenges that lie ahead. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 833–838.Google Scholar
  48. Griffin, R. W., & Lopez, Y. P. (2005). “Bad behavior” in organizations: A review and typology for future research. Journal of Management, 31, 988–1005.Google Scholar
  49. Gross, J. J., & Muftoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 151–164.Google Scholar
  50. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513.Google Scholar
  51. Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452–1465.Google Scholar
  52. Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 57–68.Google Scholar
  53. Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147–157.Google Scholar
  54. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171.Google Scholar
  55. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationships between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.Google Scholar
  56. Hastings, S. E., & Finegan, J. E. (2011). The role of ethical ideology in reactions to injustice. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 689–703.Google Scholar
  57. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Holian, R. (2006). Management decision making, ethical issues and emotional intelligence. Management Decision, 44(8), 1122–1138.Google Scholar
  59. Jelinek, R., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Be careful what you look for: The effect of trait competitiveness and long hours on salesperson deviance and whether meaningfulness of work matters. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 303–321.Google Scholar
  60. Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 525–542.Google Scholar
  61. Jordan, P., Ashkanasy, N., & Härtel, C. (2002). Emotional intelligence as a moderator of emotional and behavioral reactions to job insecurity. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 361–372.Google Scholar
  62. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.Google Scholar
  63. Kim, N., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 519–536.Google Scholar
  64. Kopelman, R. E., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The role of climate and culture in productivity. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 282–318). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Stevens, C. K. (2001). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1083–1095.Google Scholar
  66. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.Google Scholar
  67. Landen, M. (2002). Emotion management: Dabbling in mystery—white witchcraft or black art? Human Resource Development International, 5(4), 507–521.Google Scholar
  68. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483–496.Google Scholar
  69. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 41–52.Google Scholar
  71. Lindebaum, D., & Jourdan, P. J. (2012). Positive emotions, negative emotions, or utility of discrete emotions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 1027–1030.Google Scholar
  72. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.Google Scholar
  73. Lyons, B. J., & Scott, B. A. (2012). Integrating social exchange and affective explanations for the receipt of help and harm: A social network approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 66–79.Google Scholar
  74. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.Google Scholar
  75. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.Google Scholar
  76. Marks, G. (2012). The information technology services industry in Ukraine is booming. And the reason? Outsourcing. Forbes, August 27. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2012/08/27/outsourcing-fuels-ukraines-it-boom/.
  77. Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 149–171.Google Scholar
  79. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.Google Scholar
  80. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  81. Maznyuk, V., & I. Sergiychuk. (2012). Exploring Ukraine. IT outsourcing industry. Retrieved from http://hi-tech.org.ua.
  82. Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168.Google Scholar
  83. Muller, D., Charles, M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.Google Scholar
  84. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  85. Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlation redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155–164.Google Scholar
  86. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis, S. E., & Autry, C. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37, 491–520.Google Scholar
  88. Pendse, S. G. (2012). Ethical hazards: A motive, means, and opportunity approach to curbing corporate unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 265–279.Google Scholar
  89. Ping, R. A. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166–175.Google Scholar
  90. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.Google Scholar
  91. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74, 61–81.Google Scholar
  92. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.Google Scholar
  93. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.Google Scholar
  94. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.Google Scholar
  95. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.Google Scholar
  96. Rode, J. C., Mooney, C. H., Arthaud-Day, M. L., Near, J. R., Baldwin, T. T., Rubin, R. S., et al. (2007). Emotional intelligence and individual performance: Evidence of direct and moderated effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 399–421.Google Scholar
  97. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.Google Scholar
  98. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.Google Scholar
  99. Salovey, P., & Grewal, D. (2005). The science of emotional intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 281–285.Google Scholar
  100. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.Google Scholar
  101. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.Google Scholar
  102. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006a). The measurement of work engagement with a brief questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.Google Scholar
  103. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.Google Scholar
  104. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2006b). Dr Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. J. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  105. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–455.Google Scholar
  106. Simbula, S., Gugliemi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among schoolteachers. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285–304.Google Scholar
  107. Simons, T., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 102–111.Google Scholar
  108. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528.Google Scholar
  109. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269–292.Google Scholar
  110. Spreitzer, G. M., Hopkins Perttula, K., & Xin, K. (2005). Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 205–227.Google Scholar
  111. Sternberg, E. (2013). Ethical misconduct and the global financial crisis. Economic Affairs, 33, 18–33.Google Scholar
  112. Stone, A., Russell, R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349–361.Google Scholar
  113. Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031.Google Scholar
  114. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.Google Scholar
  115. Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518–538). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2000). Person–organization fit: The match between newcomers’ and recruiters’ preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 53, 113–149.Google Scholar
  117. Vancouver, J. B., Millsap, R. E., & Peters, P. A. (1994). Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 666–679.Google Scholar
  118. Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352.Google Scholar
  119. Witt, L. A. (1998). Enhancing goal congruence: A solution to organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 666–674.Google Scholar
  120. Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243–274.Google Scholar
  121. Xanthopoulou, D. A. B., Bakker, A. B., Demerout, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.Google Scholar
  122. Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A Diary Study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62, 259–295.Google Scholar
  123. Yevtushenko, S., & V. Vakht. (2011). Information technology: Industry Overview. report by InvestUkraine and Deloitte. Retrieved from http://investukraine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/IT-sector_PRINT_www.pdf.
  124. Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2004). Emotional intelligence in the workplace: A critical review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 371–399.Google Scholar
  125. Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2006). Emotional intelligence, coping with stress, and adaptation. In J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, & J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life (pp. 100–125). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  126. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2010). Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 411–425.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk De Clercq
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dave Bouckenooghe
    • 1
  • Usman Raja
    • 1
  • Ganna Matsyborska
    • 2
  1. 1.Goodman School of BusinessBrock UniversitySaint CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.OdessaUkraine

Personalised recommendations