Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 59–73 | Cite as

Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures

  • MuiChing Carina Chan
  • John Watson
  • David Woodliff


Given the increasing importance attached to both corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance, this study investigates the association between these two complimentary mechanisms used by companies to enhance relations with stakeholders. Consistent with both legitimacy and stakeholder theory and controlling for industry profile, firm size, stockholder power/dispersion, creditor power/leverage, and economic performance, our analysis of the annual reports for a sample of 222 listed companies suggests that firms providing more CSR information: have better corporate governance ratings; are larger; belong to higher profile industries; and are more highly leveraged. Our findings support the limited prior research suggesting a link between corporate governance quality and CSR disclosure in company annual reports and suggest that, rather than mandating specific disclosures, regulators might be better served focussing on corporate governance quality as a way of increasing CSR disclosures.


Corporate governance CSR disclosure Stakeholder theory Legitimacy theory 


  1. Abbot, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A., Hill, W. Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, C., & Zutshi, A. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review, 14(3), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aegis Equities Research. (2004). Top 300 shares (S&P/ASX 300). Personal Investor, December 2004, p. 66.Google Scholar
  6. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. (2005). Better governance reporting: A practical framework. Accessed 15 June 2010.
  9. Barton, S. L., Hill, N. C., & Sundaram, S. (1989). An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structure. Financial Management, 18(1), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beattie, V., & Jones, M. J. (1997). A comparative study of the use of financial graphs in the corporate annual reports of major U.S. and U.K. companies. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 8(1), 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7 & 8), 1168–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11(2), 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization–society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke, T. (2005). Accounting for Enron: Shareholder value and stakeholder interests. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 598–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  17. Commonwealth Bank of Australia. (2004). Annual report 2004, Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 14(4), 429–451.Google Scholar
  20. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowen, S., Ferreri, L., & Parker, L. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deegan, C. M., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environment protection authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information to users of accounting reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 562–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dierkes, M., & Preston, L. E. (1977). Corporate social accounting and reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Epstein, M. J., & Freedman, M. (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ernst and Ernst. (1978). Social responsibility disclosure: Surveys of Fortune 500 annual reports. Cleveland, OH: Ernst and Ernst.Google Scholar
  32. Faisal, F., Tower, G., & Rusmin, R. (2012). Legitimising corporate sustainability reporting throughout the world. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 6(2), 19–34.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
  35. Gibson, K., & O’Donovan, G. (2007). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harte, G., & Owen, D. (1991). Environmental disclosure in the annual reports of British companies: A research note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hooks, J., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. The British Accounting Review, 43(3), 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. International Integrated Reporting Committee. (2011). Towards integrated reporting: Communicating value in the 21st century. Available at: Accessed 15 June 2010.
  47. Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2011). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
  48. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keim, G. (1978). Managerial behaviour and the social responsibilities debate: Goals versus constraints. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  52. Krippendoff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Mathews, M. R. (1993). Socially responsible accounting. London: Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Mathews, M. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 481–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milne, M. J., Tregidga, H., & Walton, S. (2009). Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1211–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  59. Mitchell, C. G., & Hill, T. (2009). Corporate social and environmental reporting and the impact of internal environmental policy in South Africa. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Money, K., & Schepers, H. (2007). Are CSR and corporate governance converging? A view from boardroom directors and company secretaries in FTSE100 companies in the UK. Journal of General Management, 33(2), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parker, L. D. (1986). Polemical themes in social accounting: A scenario for standard setting. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 67–93.Google Scholar
  65. Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  67. Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (1975). Private management and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Purushothaman, M., Tower, G., Hancock, G., & Taplin, R. (2000). Determinants of corporate social reporting practices of listed Singapore companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 12(2), 101–133.Google Scholar
  69. Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, K. (2002). ISO considers corporate social responsibility standards. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 25(3), 42.Google Scholar
  72. Spence, C. (2009). Social and environmental reporting and the corporate ego. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(4), 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ticor Limited. (2004). Ticor Limited annual report. Ticor Limited, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  74. Tilt, C. A. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tinker, T., & Niemark, M. (1987). The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the banking, food and beverages and hotel industries. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11(5), 624–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  78. Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  81. WHK Horwath. (2005). Corporate governance report. Sydney: Horwath (NSW) Pty Limited.Google Scholar
  82. Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu, J., & Tu, R. (2007). CEO stock option pay and R&D spending: A behavioral agency explanation. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zeghal, D., & Ahmed, S. A. (1990). Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 3(1–2), 38–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • MuiChing Carina Chan
    • 1
  • John Watson
    • 1
  • David Woodliff
    • 1
  1. 1.Accounting & FinanceThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations