Skip to main content

Is Publicity Always Better than Advertising? The Role of Brand Reputation in Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Previous studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication suggest that firms’ social initiatives should be communicated through third-party, non-corporate sources because they are perceived as unbiased and therefore reduce consumer skepticism. In this article, we extend existing research by showing that source effects in the communication of social sponsorships are contingent on the brand’s pre-existing reputation. We argue that the congruence between the credibility and trustworthiness of the message source and the brand helps predict consumer responses to a social sponsorship. The results show that a non-corporate source (publicity) generates more positive brand evaluations than a corporate source (advertising) when the sponsor has a positive reputation. However, the converse effect occurs when brand reputation is low: when the sponsor has a poor reputation, a corporate source generates more positive brand evaluations than a non-corporate source. Mediation analyses show that the interaction effect between CSR information source and brand reputation can be explained by sponsorship attitude, persuasion knowledge, and perceived fit between the brand and the cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Artz, N., & Tybout, A. M. (1999). The moderating impact of quantitative information on the relationship between source credibility and persuasion: A persuasion knowledge model interpretation. Marketing Letters, 10(1), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J., & Cameron, G. T. (2006). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., Todd, L., & Pendleton, J. (2010). Public relations leadership in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, Why, And How Consumers Respond To Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, G. T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefit and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 4(3), 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppetti, C., Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Henkel, S. (2009). Improving incongruent sponsorships through articulation of the sponsorship and audience participation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. B., & Coote, L. V. (2005). Corporate sponsorship of a cause: The role of identification in purchase intent. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. B., Humphreys, M. S., Maguire, A. M., Weeks, C. S., & Tellegen, C. L. (2006). Sponsorship-linked marketing: The role of articulation in memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. B., Roy, D. P., & Steinard Ii, E. A. (2001). Exploring managers’ perceptions of the impact of sponsorship on brand equity. Journal of Advertising, 30(2), 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, J., & Horn, M. (1996). Sponsorship: From management ego trip to marketing success. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous, A., & Bitz, P. (1995). Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programmes. European Journal of Marketing, 29(12), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M. (2005). The medium as a contextual cue. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M., & Lange, F. (2005). Advertising weak and strong brands: Who gains? Psychology & Marketing, 22(6), 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., Törn, F., & Öhman, N. (2008). Could placing ads wrong be right? Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. J. (1994). Consumer response to corporate environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(2), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H. (2002). Associating the corporation with a charitable event through sponsorship: Measuring the effects on corporate community relations. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., & Vieira, E. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., & Küster, F. (2011). The effectiveness of publicity versus advertising: A meta-analytic investigation of its moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 906–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeseth, S. (2009). The fall of PR and the rise of advertising. Southport: Engeseth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg Naomi, A., & Sever, J. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255.

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Riel, C. B. M. V. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohs, R., Wagner, U., & Vsetecka, S. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of sport sponsorships: An empirical examination. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), 56(2), 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groza, M., Pronschinske, M., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, K. P., & Eaton, J. (1999). Building brand image through event sponsorship: The role of image transfer. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. (1999). Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing of publicity versus advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(4), 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEG. (2011a). Cereal marketers scoop up sponsorships. IEG sponsorship report.

  • IEG. (2011b). Sponsorship decision makers survey. IEG sponsorship report.

  • IEG. (2012). Economic uncertainty to slow sponsorship growth in 2012. IEG sponsorship report. From http://www.sponsorship.com/IEGSR/2012/01/03/Economic-Uncertainty-To-Slow-Sponsorship-Growth-In.aspx. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.

  • Jo, S. (2004). Effect of content type on impact: Editorial vs. advertising. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klincewicz, K. (1998). Ethical aspects of sponsorship. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1103–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y.-S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, T. (1991). The role of sponsorship in the marketing communications mix. International Journal of Advertising, 10(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The “Catch 22” of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehling, D. D., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Advertising’s immediate and delayed influence on brand attitudes: Considerations across message-involvement levels. Journal of Advertising, 17(4), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. L. (2010). Does sponsorship work in the same way in different sponsorship contexts? European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2), 180–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelsmacker, P. D., Geuens, M., & Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/Ad similarity. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (2010). The making of social sponsorship. Journal of Sponsorship, 3(3), 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, G. P., Poon, D., & West, D. C. (2010). Match game. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(2), 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R. (1977). Reliability of a short test measuring children’s attitudes toward TV commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. P., & Cornwell, T. B. (2004). The effects of consumer knowledge on responses to event sponsorships. Psychology & Marketing, 21(3), 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: From philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 35(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. (2003). The effects of prior impressions of a firm’s ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A., & Muehling, D. D. (2012). The moderating influence of brand status and source confirmation on third-party endorsement effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, C. S., Cornwell, T. B., & Drennan, J. C. (2008). Leveraging sponsorships on the internet: Activation, congruence, and articulation. Psychology & Marketing, 25(7), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. L., Laforge, R. W., & Goolsby, J. R. (1990). Personal communication in marketing: An examination of self-interest contingency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 27(2), 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siv Skard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skard, S., Thorbjørnsen, H. Is Publicity Always Better than Advertising? The Role of Brand Reputation in Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 124, 149–160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1863-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1863-3

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Reputation
  • Advertising
  • Publicity
  • Source effects