What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation?

Abstract

This study examines the dimensional consequences of (a) having positive prior corporate associations and (b) negative prior corporate associations in times of product-harm crisis by applying two dimensions of corporate associations (corporate ability vs. corporate social responsibility). The findings indicate that the disadvantages of having negative prior corporate ability (CA) associations are bigger than having negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations in times of product-harm crisis, whereas the advantages of having positive prior CSR associations are bigger than having positive CA associations. This study also provides directions for how to manage reputational strengths and weaknesses prior to a crisis as part of reputation and crisis management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    For each crisis type, the study included the conditions of (1) PCA, (2) PCSR, (3) NCA, (4) NCSR, (5) PCA + NCSR combination, (6) NCA + PCSR combination, and (7) control (no CA/CSR).

References

  1. Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26 (2), 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15 (3), 365–392. doi:10.1177/0265-7598153004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basil, M. D., Brown, W. J., & Bocarnea, M. C. (2002). Differences in univariate values versus multivariate relationships. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berens, G., van Riel, C., & Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other?. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s1055-006-9232-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71 (April), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, K.N., Wengreen, H.J., Dimmick, M., Eller, K., Frampton, A., Heaton, E.L., Staheli, T., & Christensen, N.K. (2011). Improving diets of college students: Survey of dietary habits and focus group perspectives on how to best teach students. Journal of Health Behavior and Public Health, 1(1), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, K. A., & White, C. L.(2011). Organization-Public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1–2), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20 (1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgoon, K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burson-Marsteller & Penn Schoen Berland (2011). 2011 crisis reputation preparedness study. http://www.burson-marsteller.com/Innovationandinsights/blogsandpodcasts/BMBlog/Documents/BM20and%20PSB%20Crisis%20Preparedness20Study202011.pdf.

  14. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. David, P., Kline, S. & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase Intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17 (3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson, W., & Worrell, D. (1992). Research notes and communications: The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grunwald, G., & Hempelmann, B. (2011). Impacts of reputation for quality on perceptions of company responsibility and product-related dangers in times of product-recall and public complains crises: Results from an empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 264–283. doi:10.1057/crr.2010.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L.A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38 (1), 54–69. doi:10.1177/0093650210378229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, S. (2011). Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: The synergistic model of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(2), 218–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, S. & Haley, E., & Koo, G. (2009). Comparison of the paths from consumer involvement types to ad responses between corporate advertising and product advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, S., & Rader, C. S. (2010). What they can do versus how much they care: Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500 websites. Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein, J. & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight our customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Packaged Facts. (2010, July). Prepared foods and ready-to-eat foods at retail: The new competition to foodservice. Retrieved August 24, 2011 from Marketing Research Report database.

  32. Romani S., Grappi S., & Bagozzi R. P. (2012). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sung, K. H., & Kim, S. (in press). I want to be friends with you: How effective are organizations’ interpersonal approaches on Facebook? Journal of Public Relations Research.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sora Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S. What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation?. J Bus Ethics 123, 157–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1808-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility associations
  • Corporate ability associations
  • Crisis management
  • Corporate reputation management