Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp 125–143 | Cite as

Culture, Gender, and GMAT Scores: Implications for Corporate Ethics

  • Raj Aggarwal
  • Joanne E. Goodell
  • John W. Goodell
Article

Abstract

Business leadership increasingly requires a master’s degree in business and graduate management admission test (GMAT) scores continue to be an important component of applications for admission to such programs. Given the ubiquitous use of GMAT scores as gatekeepers for business leadership, GMAT scores are likely to influence organizational ethical behavior through gender, cultural, and other biases in the GMAT. There is little prior literature in this area and we contribute by empirically documenting that GMAT scores are negatively related to the cultural dimensions of masculinity and power distance and are positively related to math literacy, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism. We estimate that cultural factors may account for as much as an 80-point difference in cross-national mean GMAT scores which are also related negatively to local language literacy, national educational spending, wealth per capita, wealth inequality, and gender development. Most interestingly, we also find a significant negative association of GMAT scores with ethical orientation. These findings have important implications for business schools and corporate ethics and leadership.

Keywords

Higher education Cultural dimensions MBA programs Business schools 

References

  1. Adams, A. J., & Hancock, T. (2000). Work experience as a predictor of MBA performance. College Student Journal, 34(2), 211–216.Google Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, R., & Goodell, J. W. (2010). Financial markets versus institutions in European countries: Influence of culture and other national characteristics. International Business Review, 19(5), 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, R. W. (1996). The relationship between culture and perception of ethical problems in international marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1109–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asgary, N., & Mitschow, M. C. (2002). Toward a model for international business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayman, R., & Chemers, M. M. (1983). Relationship of supervisory behavior ratings to work group effectiveness and subordinate satisfaction among Iranian managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(2), 338–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berk, R. A. (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolger, N., & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buck, T., Liu, X., & Ott, U. (2010). Long-term orientation and international joint venture strategies in modern China. International Business Review, 19(3), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow, C. W., Kato, Y., & Shields, M. D. (1994). National culture and the preference for management controls: An exploratory study of the firm-labor market interface. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(4–5), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, M., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2009). Selection biases in college admission test scores. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton, G. E., & Cate, T. (2004). Predicting MBA no-shows and graduate success with discriminate analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 10(3), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (1996). A methodological note on cross-cultural accounting ethics research. International Journal of Accounting, 31(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, J. H., & Ruhe, J. A. (2003). Perception of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deckro, R. F., & Woundenberg, H. W. (1977). MBA admission criteria and academic success. Decision Sciences, 8(4), 765–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dichev, I. D. (1999). How good are business school rankings? Journal of Business, 72(2), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.Google Scholar
  21. Donleavy, G. D. (2008). No man’s land: Exploring the space between Gilligan and Kohlberg. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 807–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Everson, H. T., Millsap, R. E., & Rodriguez, C. M. (1991). Isolating gender differences in test anxiety: A confirmatory factor analysis of the test anxiety inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, J. B., & Resnick, D. A. (1990). Standardized testing and graduate business school admission: A review of issues and an analysis of a Baruch College MBA cohort. College and University, 65(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
  24. Frankel, R., Swanson, S. R., & Sagan, M. (2005). The role of individualism/collectivism in critical classroom encounters: A four country study. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 17(1/2), 33–59.Google Scholar
  25. French, W., & Weis, A. (2000). An ethics of care or an ethics of justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friga, P. N., Bettis, R. A., & Sullivan, R. S. (2003). Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Getz, K. A., & Volkema, R. J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: A model of predictors and outcomes. Business and Society, 40(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gropper, D. M. (2007). Does the GMAT matter for executive MBA students? Some empirical evidence. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hancock, T. (1999). The gender difference: Validity of standardized admission tests in predicting MBA performance. The Journal of Education for Business, 75(2), 91–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, S., & Carr, C. (2008). National cultural values and the purpose of businesses. International Business Review, 17(1), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartung, P. J., Fouad, N. A., Leong, F. T. L., & Hardin, E. E. (2010). Individualism-collectivism: Links to occupational plans and work values. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedlund, J., Wilt, J. M., Nebel, K. L., Ashford, S. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hise, R. T., Shin, J.-K., Davidow, M., Fahy, J., Solano-Mendez, R., & Troy, L. (2004). A cross cultural analysis of the geographical knowledge of U.S., Irish, Israeli, Mexican, and South Korean business school students. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 15(3), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  39. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996-2007. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Kerr, J., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (2005). Managing corporate culture through reward systems. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, Y., & Kim, S.-Y. (2010). The influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirca, A. H., Cavusgil, S. T., & Hult, G. T. M. (2009). The effects of national culture on market orientation: Conceptual framework and research propositions. International Business Review, 18(2), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., & Chen, Z. X. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klasen, S. (2002). Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. World Bank Economic Review, 16(3), 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kracher, B., & Marble, R. P. (2008). The significance of gender in predicting the cognitive moral development of business practitioners using the sociomoral reflection objective measure. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 503–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2007). Predictive validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) for graduate student academic performance. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lombardi, M. (2005). Finland’s education system is tops: Here’s why. Teacher Newsmagazine, 17(5). http://bctf.ca/publications/NewsmagArticle.aspx?id=7988.
  49. Lund, D. B. (2008). Gender differences in ethics judgment of marketing professionals in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merkin, R. S. (2006). Uncertainty avoidance and facework: A test of the Hofstede model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(2), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murphy, R. J. L. (1982). Sex differences in objective test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(2), 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oetzel, J. G. (1998). Culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups: Explaining communication processes through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oh, I.-S., Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Le, H. (2008). The graduate management admission test (GMAT) is even more valid than wethought: A new development in meta-analysis and its implications for the validity of the GMAT. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(4), 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oxley, L., & McAleer, M. (1993). Econometric issues in macroeconomic models with generated regressors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 7(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pagan, A. (1984). Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. International Economic Review, 25(1), 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pagan, A. (1986). Two stage and related estimators and their applications. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 517–538.Google Scholar
  59. Paolillo, J. G. P. (1982). The predictive validity of selected admissions variables relative to grade point average earned in a master of business administration program. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 1163–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peiperl, M. A., & Trevelyan, R. (1997). Predictors of performance at business school and beyond demographic factors and the contrast between individual and group outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 15(5), 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pillai, R., & Meindl, J. R. (1998). Context and charisma: A “meso” level examination of the relationship of organic structure, collectivism, and crisis to charismatic leadership. Journal of Management, 24(5), 643–671.Google Scholar
  62. Ramirez, A., & Tadesse, S. (2009). Corporate cash holdings, uncertainty avoidance, and the multinationality of firms. International Business Review, 18(4), 307–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reynolds, C. R., & Brown, R. T. (1984). Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwartz, M. S. (2002). A code of ethics for corporate code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1–2), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Siegert, K. O. (2008). Executive education: Predicting student success in executive MBA programs. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Simga-Mugan, C., Daly, B. A., Onkal, D., & Kavut, L. (2005). The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sireci, S. G., & Talento-Miller, E. (2006). Evaluating the predictive validity of graduate management admission test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(2), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sobal, M. G. (1984). GPA, GMAT and Scale: A method for quantification of admissions criteria. Research in Higher Education, 20(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 624–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stedham, Y. E., & Yamamura, J. H. (2004). Measuring national culture: Does gender matter? Women in Management Review, 19(5), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Stodder, G. S. (1998). Goodwill Hunting: Who cares about socially responsible business practices? Seventy percent of consumers, that’s who. Entrepreneur, 26, 118.Google Scholar
  74. Sulaiman, A., & Suhana, M. (2006). Student success factors: Identifying key predictors. Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Talento-Miller, E. (2008). Generalizability of GMAT validity to programs outside the U.S. International Journal of Testing, 8(2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Talento-Miller, E., & Rudner, L. M. (2008). The validity of graduate management admission test scores: A summary of studies conducted from 1997 to 2004. Education and Psychology Measurement, 68(1), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor-Bianco, A., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. (2007). An exploration of gender and cultural differences in MBA students’ cheating behavior. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 18(4), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Velasquez, M. G., & Rostankowksi, C. (1985). Ethics theory and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  79. Vitell, S. J., Nwachukwu, S. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Volkema, R. J. (2004). Demographic, cultural, and economic predictors of perceived ethicality of negotiation behavior: A nine-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weeks, W. A., Moore, C. W., McKinney, J. A., & Longenecker, J. G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Werhane, P. H. (2008). Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wright, R. E., & Palmer, J. C. (1994). GMAT scores and undergraduate GPAs as predictors of performance in graduate business programs. Journal of Education for Business, 69, 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yamin, M., & Golesorkhi, S. (2010). Cultural distance and the pattern of equity ownership structure in international joint ventures. International Business Review, 19(5), 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zwick, R. (1993). The validity of the GMAT for the prediction of grades in doctoral study in business and management: An empirical Bayes approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 18(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raj Aggarwal
    • 1
  • Joanne E. Goodell
    • 2
  • John W. Goodell
    • 3
  1. 1.Sullivan Professor of International Business and FinanceUniversity of AkronAkronUSA
  2. 2.College of Education and Human ServicesCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations