Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 122, Issue 2, pp 307–320 | Cite as

Addressing the Global Sustainability Challenge: The Potential and Pitfalls of Private Governance from the Perspective of Human Capabilities

  • Agni KalfagianniEmail author
Article

Abstract

Contemporary global politics is characterized by an increasing trend toward experimental forms of governance, with an emphasis on private governance. A plurality of private standards, codes of conduct and quality assurance schemes currently developed particularly, though not exclusively, by TNCs replace traditional intergovernmental regimes in addressing profound global environmental and socio-economic challenges ranging from forest deforestation, fisheries depletion, climate change, to labor and human rights concerns. While this trend has produced a heated debate in science and politics, surprisingly little attention has been paid on the effects of private governance on questions of distribution and justice. This is highly problematic. At the beginning of the twenty-first century global inequalities are greater than ever before, while rapid economic, social, political, and environmental changes threaten to further derail sustainable development and humanitarian objectives. If private governance creates or intensifies some of the pressing global inequalities (e.g., food security), and alleviates others (e.g., environmental degradation), from a business ethics perspective, we need to know which aspects need to be strengthened and where appropriate interventions are necessary and desirable. This paper proposes a framework to examine and classify the distributive outcomes of private governance institutions through the lenses of one particular approach to distributive justice, the capability approach. Empirically, it focuses on agrifood one area where the controversy regarding the distributive concerns of private governance are particularly pronounced.

Keywords

Agrifood Capabilities approach Governance Private standards Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the participants of the international workshop “Governing Sustainable Agriculture through Multistakeholder Initiatives: Participation, Knowledge and Networks in Action,” Montpellier (France), 12–14 December 2012, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. ActionAid International (2005). Power Hungry: Six Reasons to Regulate Global Food Corporations, London: ActionAid International. http://www.actionaid.org/docs/power_hungry.pdf. Accessed Mar 2011.
  2. Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Hulme, M. (2005). Redefining global environmental change (editorial). Global Environmental Change, 15, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, J. (2009). Taking property rights seriously: The case of climate change. Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation, 26(2), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amekawa, Y. (2009). Reflections on the growing influence of good agricultural practices in the global south. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(6), 531–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auld, G., Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2008). The new corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bäckstrand, K., Campe, S., Chan, S., Mert, A., & Schäferhoff, M. (2012). Transnational public–private partnerships. In F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Eds.), Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 123–148). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, T., Scrieciu, S., & Taylor, D. (2008). Climate change, social justice and development. Development, 51, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labor practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bartley, T. (2010). Transnational private regulation in practice: The limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia. Business and Politics, 12(3), article 7.Google Scholar
  12. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 1(4), 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bertland, A. (2008). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
  14. Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: The failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. International Relations, 19, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Botterill, L. C., & Daugbjerg, C. (2011). Engaging with private sector standards: A case study of GlobalGAP. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(4), 488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Busch, L. (2000). The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Busch, L. (2011). The private governance of food: Equitable exchange or Bizarre Bazaar? Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Busch, L. (2012). Standards. Recipes for Reality. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Büthe, T. (2010). Global private politics: A research agenda. Business and Politics, 12(3), article 12.Google Scholar
  21. Castoriadis, C. (1986). Domains de l’Homme, Seuil.Google Scholar
  22. Clapp, J. (2001). Toxic exports. The transfer of hazardous wastes from rich to poor countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Clapp, J. (2012). Food. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2005). Paths to a green world: The political economy of the global environment. Boston: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Clapp, J., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). In Karsten Ronit (Ed.), Private voluntary programs in climate policy: Pitfalls and potentials (pp. 43–75). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Comim, F. (2008). Climate injustice and development: A capability perspective. Development, 5(3), 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Courville, S. (2006). Understanding NGO-based social and environmental regulatory systems: Why we need new models of accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. European Commission (2009). Contributing to sustainable development: The role of fair trade and nongovernmental trade-related sustainability assurance schemes, COM(2009) 215 final.Google Scholar
  30. Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). (2009). Increasing incomes and food security of small farmers in West and Central Africa through exports of organic and fair-trade tropical products: Project impact study in Ghana—Pineapple. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  32. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). (2010). The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  33. Fransen, L. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and global labor standards. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Fuchs, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2010). The causes and consequences of private food governance, Business and Politics, 12(3), article 5.Google Scholar
  35. Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gasper, D. (2002). Is sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development? Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibbon, P., Bolwig, S., Odeke, M., & Taylor, A. (2008). Certified organic export production: Implications for economic welfare and gender equality among smallholder farmers in tropical Africa. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
  38. Giovanola, B. (2009). Re-thinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Graffham, A., Karehu, E., & MacGregor, J. (2007). Impact of EurepGAP on small-scale vegetable growers in Kenya, Fresh Insights. http://www.agrifoodstandards.net/en/filemanager/active?fid=83. Accessed 14 Mar 2012.
  40. Graz, J. C., & Nölke, A. (2008). Transnational private governance and its limits. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Gulbrandsen, H. L. (2010). Transnational environmental governance: The emergence and effects of the certification of forests and fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gullison, R. E. (2003). Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx, 37, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gupta, J., & Lebel, L. (2010). Access and allocation in earth system governance: Water and climate change compared. International Environmental Agreements, 10(4), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Guthman, J. (2007). The polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 39(3), 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hachez, N., & Wouters, J. (2011). A glimpse at the democratic legitimacy of private standards. Assessing the public accountability of Global G.A.P. Journal of international economic law, 14(3), 677–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamann, R., Giamporcaro, S., Yachkaschi, S., & Johnston, D. (2011). The role of business and cross-sector collaboration in addressing the “wicked problem” of food insecurity. Development South Africa, 28(4), 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henson, S., & Humphrey, J. (2009). The impacts of private food safety standards on the food chain and on public standard-setting processes. Paper prepared for FAO and WHO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1132e/i1132e00.pdf. Accessed 05 July 2012.
  48. Hoerner, J. A., & Robinson, N. (2008). A climate of change: African Americans, global warming, and a just climate policy for the US. Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative, 1, 1–59.Google Scholar
  49. ITC (International Trade Center), (2009). The impacts of private standards on producers in developing countries, Geneva: ITC. Doc. No. MAR-11-201.E.Google Scholar
  50. ITC (International Trade Center), (2011). The interplay of public and private standards, Geneva: ITC, Doc. No. MAR-11-215.E.Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, W. (2011). Envisioning a new agriculture. Public Library Quarterly, 30(1), 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jaffee, D., & Howard, P. H. (2010). Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(4), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones, C. (2005). Institutions with global scope: Moral cosmopolitanism and political practice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 1–27.Google Scholar
  54. Kalfagianni, A., & Fuchs, D. (2012). The GlobalGap. In A. Reed, D. Reed, & P. Utting (Eds.), Business, non-state regulation and development (pp. 160–172). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Kalfagianni, A., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Private agrifood governance and the challenges for sustainability. In Guy Robinson, Doris Schmallegger, & Jen Cleary (Eds.), The globalisation of agriculture. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Kalfagianni, A., & Pattberg, P. (2013a). The marine stewardship council. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences,. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0118-z.Google Scholar
  57. Kalfagianni, A., & Pattberg, P. (2013b). Fishing in muddy waters? Conditions for effective private governance in fisheries and aquaculture. Marine Policy, 38, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Klooster, D. (2005). Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: The political ecology of nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of American Geographers, 96, 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kolk, A. (2011). Mainstreaming sustainable coffee. Sustainable Development,. doi: 10.1002/sd.Google Scholar
  60. Kollman, K., & Prakash, A. (2001). Green by choice? Cross-national variation in firm’s responses to EMS-based environmental regimes. World Politics, 53, 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food wars. The global battle for mouths, minds and markets (p. 365). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  62. Linton, A., & Murphy M. (2007). Good markets and public goods: Impacts of fair trade in the global south, Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Linton, A. (2008). A niche for sustainability? Fair labor and environmentally sound practices in the specialty coffee industry. Globalizations, 5(2), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Linton, A. M., Liou, C. C., & Shaw, K. A. (2004). A taste of trade justice: Marketing global social responsibility via fair trade coffee. Globalizations, 1(2), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lyon, S. (2009). What good will two more trees do? The political economy of sustainable coffee certification, local livelihoods and identities. Landscape Research, 34(2), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2003). Setting international standards: Technological rationality or primacy of power? World Politics, 56, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mayer, F., & Gereffi, G. (2010). Regulation and economic globalization: Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), article 11.Google Scholar
  68. McAfee, K. (1999). Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Society and Space: Environment and Planning Pion, 17(2), 153–154.Google Scholar
  69. McEntee, J. C. (2011). Realizing rural food justice. Divergent locals in the northeastern United States. In A. H. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice. Race, class and sustainability (pp. 121–146). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Nadvi, K. (2008). Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nadvi, K., & Wältring, F. (2002). INEF Report, 58. Duisburg: Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden.Google Scholar
  72. Nagayets, O. (2005). Small farms: Current status and key trends, Paper prepared for the future of small farms research workshop. London: Wye College.Google Scholar
  73. Neilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2007). Green coffee? The contradictions of global sustainability initiatives from an Indian perspective. Development Policy Review, 25(3), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Aristotle politics and human capabilities: A response to Antony Arneson, Charlesworth and Mulgan. Ethics, 111(1), 102–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Okereke, C. (2008). Equity norms in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Okereke, C., & Dooley, K. (2010). Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: Towards a post-kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Paehlke, R. (2001). Environment, equity and globalization: Beyond resistance. Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pattberg, P. (2006). Private governance and the south: Lessons from global forest politics. Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pearce, J., & Kingham, S. (2008). Environmental inequalities in New Zealand: A national study of air pollution and environmental justice. Geoforum, 39(2), 980–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pearson, R. (2007). Beyond women workers: Gendering CSR. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 731–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ponte, S. (2007). Greener than thou: The political economy of fish ecolabelling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Development, 36(1), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Porter, T., & Ronit, K. (2010). The challenges of global business authority. Democratic renewal, stalemate or decay?, (pp. 227–256). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  83. Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Samman, G. (2006). Human development: Beyond the human development index. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 323–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Renard, M. C. (2010). In the name of conservation: CAFE practices and fair trade in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Renard, M.-C., & Perezgrovas, V. (2007). Fair trade coffee in Mexico: At the center of the debates. In L. T. Raynolds, D. Murray, & J. Wilkinson (Eds.), Fair trade: The challenges of confronting globalization (pp. 138–156). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Renouard, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility utilitarianism and the capabilities approach. Journal of business ethics, 98, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rice, J. (2009). The transnational organisation of production and uneven environmental degradation and change in the world economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(3–4), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sandbrook, R. (2005). Africa’s great transformation. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(6), 1118–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schaller, S. (2007). The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Governance: An Analysis of the Ethical Trading Initiative. INEF Report 91/2007, Institute for Development and Peace, University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  91. Schlosberg, D., & Carruthers, D. (2010). Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 12–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schösler, H., de Boer, J., & Boersma, J. J. (2012). ‘The organic food philosophy: A qualitative exploration of the practices, values and beliefs of Dutch organic consumers within a cultural-historical frame. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9392-0.Google Scholar
  93. Schroeder, D., & Pogge, T. (2009). Justice and the convention on biological diversity. Ethics and International Affairs, 23(3), 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf Press.Google Scholar
  95. Sen, G. (2004). Women, poverty, and population: Issues for the concerned environmentalist. In K. Conca, Dabelko, & Geoffery (Eds.), Green planet blues (pp. 25–29). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  96. Shapiro, I. (2003a). The state of democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Shapiro, I. (2003b). The moral foundations of politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Shiva, V. (1997). Feminist ecology is the answer. Horizons, 11(4), 16.Google Scholar
  99. Smith, G. (2009). Interaction of Public and Private Standards in the Food Chain. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No 15, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/221282527214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Taylor, P. L. (2005). In the market but not of it: Fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change. World Development, 33(1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2009). World investment report, ‘transnational corporations, agricultural production and development’. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  103. Utting, P. & Marques, J. C. (Eds.), (2010). Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? United Nations research institute for social development (UNRISD).Google Scholar
  104. Valkila, J. (2009). Fair trade organic coffee production in Nicaragua: Sustainable development or a poverty trap? Ecological Economics, 68(12), 3018–3025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  106. Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Policy AnalysisInstitute for Environmental Studies, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations