Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Impact Assessments from a Business Perspective: Extending Knowledge and Guiding Business Practice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic growth and development remain embedded in the very core of our current international economic system and the so called “material economy”. However, depleting natural resources and environmental degradation, which now threaten the well-being of future generations, has challenged this premise, and placed sustainable development as a necessary objective of business activity and expansion. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) have emerged as a key tool for governments, businesses, and NGOs to manage the negative impact of their activities on the environment. Businesses in particular play a key role in averting or mitigating current environmental trends given that the economic growth they have stimulated has serious consequences for both the environment and social well-being. However, research on the use of EIAs has been conducted mostly from a governmental perspective producing a clear gap between research development and business (corporate) practice. To bridge this gap in knowledge, we develop a new EIA process tailored to real world business constraints and provide a range of propositions which we hope will stimulate future research efforts toward understanding and guiding how businesses integrate environmental issues into their decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2005). Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoyaw-Osei, Y. (2004). Environmental assessment mainstreaming—Promoting and facilitating investment, sustainable development and compliance. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Annandale, D., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Huges, M. (2004). A comparison of archival verses perceptual measurement of the impact of voluntary environmental instruments on corporate environmental performance. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Appiah-Opoku, S. (2001). Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, J., Caldwell, P., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2001). Environmental impact assessment follow-up: Good practice and future directions—Findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(3), 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (1997). Environmental impact assessment and management: An underexplored relationship. Environmental Management, 21(3), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bina, O. (2004). Reflecting on the evolution environmental assessment. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Birley, M. (2004). How HIA is done in Shell’s business. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Boiral, O. (2002). Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning, 35, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Skelton, N. W. (2011). Industry and government perspectives on First Nations’ participation in the British Columbia environmental assessment process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S., & Hudson, M. D. (2012). Determination of significance in Ecological Impact Assessment: Past change, current practice and future improvements. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.04.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, M. (2004). The role of science in environmental impact assessment: Process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(4), 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casteli, A. L. (2011). Land use change in Brazil: The effectiveness of EIA. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Creasey, R., & Beswick, B. (2004). Conducting impact assessment because it is the right thing to do: The Waterton Seismic Project 2003. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Dada, O. J., & Adoki, A. (2004). Scoping in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC): The experience with the major trunk line replacement project. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Dalkman, H. (2004). Implementing the European SEA Directive in German—Between “Do-minimum” and “(Pro-)Active Initiatives”. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • De Jong, M., & Brown, H. (2004). Adopting the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative: What mechanisms determine its spread among firms in different countries? 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Doran, L. (2004). From cost to benefit: Can sustainability breathe new life into impact assessment? 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Duffy, P. J. B. (2004). Canadian application of EIA to agriculture, forestry and fisheries: An overview. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Elliott, M., & Thomas, I. (2009). Environmental impact assessment in Australia: Theory and practice. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts (1st ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, T. (2002). Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria—The same requirements for every assessment? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. M., Brereton, D., & Moran, C. J. (2010). Managing the cumulative impacts of coal mining on regional communities and environments in Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28(4), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2005). Introduction to environmental impact assessment (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron, H., MacPherson, C., & Leonardo, T. (2011). Incorporating stakeholder climate change priorities in SEA: Lessons learned from Asia. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Hinterberger, F., Luks, F., & Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1997). Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’: What makes an economy sustainable? Ecological Economics, 23(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, K., & Storbjork, S. (2012). Strategy making and power in environmental assessments. Lessons from the establishment of an out-of-town shopping centre in Vasteras, Sweden. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 34, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K., & Hertin, J. (2007). Evaluating integrated impact assessments: A conceptual framework. EPIGOV Conference Paper No. 7 (pp. 1–26). Berlin: Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy.

  • Janssen, R. (2001). On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(2), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joao, E., Vanclay, F., & den Broeder, L. (2011). Emphasising enhancement in all forms of impact assessment: Introduction to a special issue. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(3), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalev, N., & Koppel, J. (2004). Environmental impact assessment system and practice of public participation in the Russian Federation. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Kylakorpi, L., & Rydgran, B. (2004). Quantitative biodiversity impact assessment: Five years of using the BIOTOPE method. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Lawrence, D. P. (2003). Environmental impact assessment: Practical solutions to recurrent problems. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., Murray, S. A., Kortec, B., & Dey, C. J. (2003). Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects—A case study using input–output analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonen, M. M. V. F., & Santiago, J. S. S. (1993). Disparities in EIA systems of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 10(2), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezczynska, A. (2009). The concept of designing a corporate environmental strategy. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 1(3), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle, R. (2004). Impact assessment of industrial projects in Quebec: What the last eight years have taught us. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Maldonado, E. R., & Robles, M. M. (2011). Entailment of the EIA with the public cost. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Marsden, S. (2011). Reform of Australia’s Offshore Oil and Gas Sector: Montara, the Commission of Inquiry and the Role of Transboundary EIA. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • McEachren, J., Whitelaw, G. S., McCarthy, D. D., & Tsuji, L. J. S. (2011). The controversy of transferring the Class Environmental Assessment process to northern Ontario, Canada: The Victor Mine Power Supply Project. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanez-Cartaxo, L. E. (2004). The EIA Process: A challenge to decision making engineers. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Morgan, T. K. K. B., & Yukich, K. H. (2011). Impact assessment for aid project evaluation. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Morrison-Saunders, A., & Retief, F. (2012). Walking the sustainability assessment talk—Progressing the practice of environmental impact assessment (EIA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 36, 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvihill, P. R., & Jacobs, P. (1998). Using scoping as a design process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(4), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K., Roux, D. J., Nel, J. L., Driver, A., & Freimund, W. (2011). Absorptive capacity as a guiding concept for effective public sector management and conservation of freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Management, 47, 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. A., & Nathwani, M. (2004). Sustainability Assessment for projects and other business decisions in Shell Canada. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Norejko, M. (2004). Techniques for efficient implementation of public participation in Environmental Assessments. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Oberg, C., Huge-Brodin, M., & Bjorklund, M. (2012). Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments. Journal of Business Research, 65, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olausson, I., & Oscarsson, A. (2004). The quality in EIA concerning detailed development plan (DDP). 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Pezzey, J. (1992). Sustainable development concepts: An economic analysis. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polido, A., & Ramis, T. B. (2011). Evaluation of strategic environmental assessment scoping effectiveness. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Principles for Responsible Investment. (2011). The Principles for Responsible Investment. http://www.unpri.org/principles/. Accessed 27 Feb 2011.

  • Rajvanshi, A., Brownlie, S., Slootweg, R., & Arora, R. (2011). Maximizing benefits for biodiversity: The potential of enhancement strategies in impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(3), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Murray, A. (2004). Integrating impact assessment and environmental management: The Vancouver international airport authority experience. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Roe, D. (2009). The Millennium Development Goals and natural resources management: Reconciling sustainable livelihoods and resource conservation or fuelling a divide?. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, E., & Murak, M. (2011). Quitana Roo an Example of the EIA inefficiency. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Sachs, J. D., Baillie, J. E. M., Sutherland, W. J., Armsworth, P. R., Ash, N., Beddington, J., et al. (2009). Biodiversity conservation and the millennium development goals. Science, 325(5947), 1502–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L. E., & Andre, P. (2011). Organizational learning in EIA agencies—The case of Quebec, Canada. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Schetke, S., Haase, D., & Kotter, T. (2012). Towards sustainable settlement growth: A new multi-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sok, V., Boruf, B. J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2011). Addressing climate change through environmental impact assessment: International perspectives from a survey of IAIA members. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(4), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spatareanu, M. (2007). Searching for pollution havens: The impact of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. The Journal of Environment & Development, 16(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinemann, A. (2001). Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B., English, M., & Travis, C. (2000). A framework for understanding and improving environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, L. F., & Hizsnyik, E. (1998). Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolution and applications. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3(3), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubino, D. I. S., Yap, N. T., & Devlin, J. F. (2011). Professional practice: Vale and its corporate sustainability performance in Itabira, Brazil: Is the glass half full or half empty? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(2), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1997). Agenda for development. New York: United Nation.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui, K. (2011). ‘JICA’s EIA capacity development in East Timor. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Vakhitova, T. V., Guthrie, P., Roders, A. P., & Sunikka, M. (2011). World Heritage Impact Assessment: Experience from the UK. 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 28 May–4 June, Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Wen, M., Laudry, F., Breckenridge, E., & Pelletier, C. (2004). Looking beyond the EIA. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Wood, G., Glasson, J., & Becker, J. (2006). EIA scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, N. T. (2004). Who says command-and control doesn’t work? Case studies of corporate environmental performance and public policy in Taiwan. 24th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, 24–30 April, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Zubair, S., Bowen, D., & Elwin, E. (2011). Not quite paradise: Inadequacies of environmental impact assessment in the Maldives. Tourism Management, 32, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Enterprise, Swinburne University of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia

    Hermann Lion, Jerome D. Donovan & Rowan E. Bedggood

Authors
  1. Hermann Lion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerome D. Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rowan E. Bedggood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome D. Donovan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lion, H., Donovan, J.D. & Bedggood, R.E. Environmental Impact Assessments from a Business Perspective: Extending Knowledge and Guiding Business Practice. J Bus Ethics 117, 789–805 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1721-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1721-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation