Skip to main content
Log in

The Roles of Justice and Customer Satisfaction in Customer Retention: A Lesson from Service Recovery

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customers complain because they want to be treated fairly by the company when a service failure occurs. The role of perceived complaint justice and its relation to customer satisfaction has been discussed and researched. However, a static view is mostly adopted in previous literature. We argue that satisfaction is cumulative and both prior satisfaction and post-recovery satisfaction should be looked at in relation to complaint justice in the context of service recovery. This study attempts to fill the gap by investigating the mediating role of justice in the relationship between prior satisfaction and post-recovery satisfaction (both with the recovery and with the organization) and examining the mediating role of post-recovery satisfaction in the relationship between the dimensions of justice and customer retention. Hypotheses were tested using a sample of 200 customers that had service failure experience at Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong. Justice dimensions (distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice) were found to fully mediate the relationship between prior satisfaction and satisfaction with recovery. All dimensions, except the interactional justice, were also found to be partial mediators in the relationship between prior satisfaction and post-recovery satisfaction with organization. Findings also revealed the mediating roles of two post-recovery satisfaction variables in transferring the justice dimensions into behavioral intention, with the two variables playing almost opposite roles. Discussion and recommendations are provided for future development and improvement in building long-term relationship with customers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. C. (2002). Consumer reactions to unethical service recovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1991). Marketing services: Competing through quality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employee’s viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J., Wakefield, K., & Barnes, J. (1995). The effects of customer service on consumer complaining behavior. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(4), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J., Hill, D., & Tax, S. (1997). The effects of distributive justice, procedural and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, E. (1993). An investigation into the relationship of fairness and customer satisfaction with service. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace—Approaching fairness in human resource management series in applied psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992). Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perception. Journal of Business Research, 25(2), 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1988). Service quality: The six criteria of good perceived service quality. Review of Business, 9, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D., & Kelley, S. (2000). Perceived justice needs a recovery evaluation: A contingency approach. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D., Kelley, S., & Rotalsky, H. (1995). Tracking service failures and employee recovery efforts. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(2), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, A. K., & Loh, E. W. Y. (2006). The effects of service recovery on consumer satisfaction: A comparison between complainants and non-complainants. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S., & Davis, M. (1994). Antecedents to customer expectations for service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S., Hoffman, D., & Davis, M. (1993). A typology of retail failures and recovery. Journal of Retailing, 69(4), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus, K., & Nasir, S. (2008). Integration of comparison level theory to analyze the relationship between complaint recovery satisfaction and post-complaint consumer responses. The Business Review of Cambridge, 10(1), 344–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxham, J., I. I. I., & Netemeyer, R. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: The effects of shared values and perceived organizational justice on customers’ evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 67(January), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R., & Linda, G. (1980). Effects of satisfaction and its antecedents on consumer preference and intention. In K. Monrie (Ed.), Advances in consumer research VIII. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A., Beggs, R., & Keown-McMullan, C. (2000). Equity and repurchase intention following service failure. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(6), 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiders, K., & Berry, L. L. (1998). Service fairness: What it is and why it matters. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauss, B. (2002). The dimensions of complaint satisfaction: Process and outcome complaint satisfaction versus cold fact and warm act complaint satisfaction. Managing Service Quality, 12(3), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauss, B., & Friege, C. (1999). Regaining service customers: Costs and benefits of regain management. Journal of Service Research, 1(4), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tax, S., Brown, S., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluation of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2008). Critical incidents and the impact of satisfaction on customer share. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(August), 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W. (1999). Business Research Methods. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel Yee-Man Siu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siu, N.YM., Zhang, T.JF. & Yau, CY.J. The Roles of Justice and Customer Satisfaction in Customer Retention: A Lesson from Service Recovery. J Bus Ethics 114, 675–686 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1713-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1713-3

Keywords

Navigation