Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 114, Issue 4, pp 607–623 | Cite as

Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities?

Article

Abstract

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Corporate financial performance Innovation Social dimensions Investor decision making 

References

  1. Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballou, B., Godwin, N. H., & Shortridge, R. B. (2003). Firm value and employee attitudes on workplace quality. Accounting Horizons, 17, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berens, G., Van Riel, C. B., & Van Bruggen, M. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco, B., Guillamon-Saorin, E., & Guiral, A. (2012). Do non-socially responsible companies achieve legitimacy through socially responsible actions? The mediating effect of innovation. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1503-3.
  9. Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 7–16.Google Scholar
  11. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. (1987). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demers, E., & Lev, B. (2001). A rude awakening: Internet shakeout in 2000. Review of Accounting Studies, 6, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk, R. F. (1987). A primer for soft modeling. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Human Development.Google Scholar
  17. FASB. (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Financial Accounting Standard Board. http://www.fasb.org/pdf/aop_CON2.pdf.
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foss, K., & Rodgers, W. (2011). Enhancing information usefulness by line managers’ involvement in cross-unit activities. Organization Studies, 32, 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  21. Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 921, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guiral, A. (2012). Corporate social performance, innovation intensity and financial performance: Evidence from lending decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(2), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hein, S. (1981). Employees and the corporate social report: The Dutch case. The Accounting Review, 56, 294–308.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2004). Audit firm portfolio management decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 424, 659–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, S., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lev, B., & Sarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 372, 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lichtenberg, F., & Siegel, D. (1991). The impact of R&D investment on productivity: New evidence using linked R&D-LRD data. Economic Inquiry, 29, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maiga, A. S., & Jacobs, F. A. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of quality performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 17, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 655–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  40. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paul, C. M., & Siegel, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 263, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 356, 1518–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social–financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business and Society, 36, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 16, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reichheld, F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81, 46–54.Google Scholar
  50. Rodgers, W. (1997). Throughput modeling: Financial information used by decision makers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  51. Roman, R. M., Hayibor, S., & Alge, B. R. (1999). The relationship between social and financial performance: Repainting a portrait. Business and Society, 38, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., Fuentes-Barberá, C., & Garcí-Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 134, 597–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 3, 540–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, C., & Watts, R. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 315, 463–490.Google Scholar
  61. Trueman, B., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, X. J. (2000). The eyeballs have it: Searching for the value in internet stocks. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ullmann, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–577.Google Scholar
  64. Vitaliano, D., & Stella, G. (2006). The cost of corporate social responsibility: The case of the community reinvestment act. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 263, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Voss, R., & Gruber, T. (2005). Complaint handling at the Schindlerhof Hotel with praise and assessment cards. Management Services, 49, 16–19.Google Scholar
  66. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xu, B., Magnan, M. L., & Andre, P. E. (2007). The stock market valuation of R&D information in biotech firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 244, 1291–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(Supplement), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waymond Rodgers
    • 1
    • 4
  • Hiu Lam Choy
    • 2
  • Andrés Guiral
    • 3
  1. 1.University of HullYorkshireUK
  2. 2.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Yonsei University School of BusinessSeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.University of TexasEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations