Skip to main content

Meaningful Work: Connecting Business Ethics and Organization Studies

Journal of Business Ethics volume 121, pages 77–90 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

In the human quest for meaning, work occupies a central position. Most adults spend the majority of their waking hours at work, which often serves as a primary source of purpose, belongingness, and identity. In light of these benefits to employees and their organizations, organizational scholars are increasingly interested in understanding the factors that contribute to meaningful work, such as the design of jobs, interpersonal relationships, and organizational missions and cultures. In a separate line of inquiry, scholars of business ethics have examined meaningful work as a moral issue concerning the management of others and ourselves, exploring whether there are definable characteristics of meaningful work to which we have moral rights, and whether there are moral duties to ourselves and others to fulfill those rights. In this article, we examine contemporary developments in both disciplines about the nature, causes, and consequences of meaningful work; we explore linkages between these disciplines; and we offer conclusions and research opportunities regarding the interface of ethical and organizational perspectives on performing and providing meaningful work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. For simplicity, this scholarly tradition will generally be referred to as “business ethics,” even though it also includes philosophers and ethicists who do not primarily identify as business ethicists but who have written on business, work, and economics. Their study, reputations, and research methods may be influential on and familiar to many business ethics scholars.

  2. This is not to say that all organization scholars use exclusively empirical research methods and all business ethics scholars use exclusively normative research methods. Within the ethics and business ethics literature, our focus on normative research allows for some comparisons and contrasts with organization studies research that we believe to be especially interesting and potentially fruitful.

References

  • Arneson, R. J. (1987). Meaningful work and market socialism. Ethics, 97(2), 517–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Work organizations as secular religions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R., & Knight, K. (2012). Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. C., Kim, R. C., & O’Gorman, K. D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1083–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, K. (2007). Work and emancipatory practice: Towards a recovery of human beings’ productive capabilities. Res Publica, 13, 381–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Nord, W. R. (1990). Meanings of occupational work. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the dual edges of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 32–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (2005). The caring approach and social issues in management education. Journal of Management Education, 29(3), 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardador, M. T., Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2011). Linking calling orientations to organizational attachment via organizational instrumentality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Care, N. (1984). Career choice. Ethics, 94, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (2003). Responsible restructuring: Seeing employees as assets, not costs. Ivey Business Journal, 68, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern work. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Sippola, L., & Phelps, E. (2001). Social responsibility and paid work in contemporary American life. In A. Rossi (Ed.), Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community (pp. 463–501). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, N. (1987). Morality and the meaning of life: Some first thoughts. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dik, B. J., Byrne, Z. S., & Steger, M. F. (Eds.) (2013). Purpose and meaning in the workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (forthcoming).

  • Dobson, J., & White, J. (1995). Toward the feminine firm: An extension to Thomas White. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. J. (2003). Taking ethics seriously: A mission now more possible. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. P. (2010). Meaningful work, the meaning of work, and business ethics. In C. Michaelson, A. M. Grant & M. G. Pratt (Eds.), Panelist Remarks at 2010 Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting, Montreal.

  • Eagleton, T. (2007). The meaning of life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1963). Tolstoi and the meaning of life. Ethics, 73(2), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (2001). My job, my self: Work and the creation of the modern individual. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (2003). The importance of being lazy: In praise of play, leisure, and vacations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E. (2007). Conscience and corporate culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008a). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 108–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008b). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11, 48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D., & Lee, K. (2007). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011a). It’s not all about me: Motivating hospital handwashing by focusing on patients. Psychological Science, 22, 1494–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011b). Outsourcing inspiration: The performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greil, A. L., & Rudy, D. R. (1984). Social cocoons: Encapsulation and identity transformation in organizations. Sociological Inquiry, 54, 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz, I., & Fu, X. (2002). The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change. Human Relations, 55(6), 639–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Scherer, A. G. (2010). When organization theory met business ethics: Toward further symbioses. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 643–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1997). Path–goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N. (2005). Rawlsian justice and workplace republicanism. Social Theory and Practice, 31, 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N. (2008). Justice in production. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(1), 72–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Organization (ILO). (2006). Facts on decent work. Retrieved December, 2008, from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_082654.pdf.

  • Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (2007). Meaningful connections: Positive relationships and attachments at work. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 189–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., I. I. I., Mohrman, S. A., & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the Fortune 1000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., Harvie, P., & Frizzel, C. (1998). The correspondence of patient satisfaction and nurse burnout. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1611–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepisto, D., Pradies, C., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). Exploring meaningful work: Toward a dual conception, application, and research agenda. Working paper, Boston College.

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’ and the ‘management of meaning’. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, I. (1989). Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 951–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1844/1997). Alienated labor. In Writings of the Young Marx on philosophy and society (L. E. Easton & K. H. Guddat, Trans., pp. 287–300). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

  • May, D. R., Gilson, L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2002). Recent work on the meaning of life. Ethics, 112, 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2005). Introduction (to a special issue on meaning in life). Philosophical Papers, 34(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2007). The meaning of life. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 13 Dec 2011 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/.

  • Michaelson, C. (2005a). Meaningful motivation for work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2005b). ‘I want your shower time!’ Drowning in work and the erosion of life. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 24(4), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2008). Work and the most terrible life. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2009). Meaningful work and moral worth. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 28(1–4), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2010). The importance of meaningful work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2011). Whose responsibility is meaningful work? Journal of Management Development, 30(6), 548–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. (2009). Rawls, self-respect, and the opportunity for meaningful work. Social Theory and Practice, 35(3), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. (2010). Participation in the workplace: Are employees special? Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOW International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L., & Stevenson, H. (2004). Just enough: Tools for creating success in your work and life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, J. (1991). Money and the meaning of life. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R., Brief, A. P., Atieh, J. M., & Doherty, E. M. (1990). Studying meanings of work: The case of work values. In A. P. Brief & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Meanings of occupational work (pp. 21–64). Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, G. E. (1992). Changing meanings of work. In J. F. Hartley & G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Employment relations: The psychology of influence and control at work (pp. 44–66). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (2003). Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., Khurana, R., & Hill-Popper, M. (2005). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. In B. M. Staw & R. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 26 (pp. 1–36). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 308–327). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., Pradies, C., & Lepisto, D. (2013). Doing well, doing good, and doing with: Organizational practices for effectively cultivating meaningful work. In B. Dik, Z. Byrne & M. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace. Washington, DC: APA Books (forthcoming).

  • Pratt, M. G., & Rosa, J. A. (2003). Transforming work–family conflict into commitment in network marketing organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvanova, R. K., Bono, J. E., & Dzieweczynski, J. (2006). Transformational leadership, job characteristics, and organizational citizenship performance. Human Performance, 19, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., & England, G. W. (1996). How working is defined: Structure and stability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 515–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2009). Contributive justice and meaningful work. Res Publica, 15, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. (1982). Meaningful work. Ethics, 92(4), 634–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seachris, J. (2011). Meaning of life: The analytic perspective. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 13 Dec 2011 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/.

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776/1993). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (ed. Kathryn Sutherland). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Šverko, B., & Vizek-Vidović, V. (1995). Studies on the meaning of work: Approaches, models, and some of the findings. In D. E. Super & B. Šverko (Eds.), Life roles, values, and careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkel, S. (1974). Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely with our limits. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Y. N., Hadas-Halperin, I., & Raveh, D. (2008). Patient photos spur radiologist empathy and eye for detail. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, November.

  • Walsh, A. J. (1994). Meaningful work as a distributive good. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C. (1996). Reflections on the practical relevance of feminist thought to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C. B., Ku, G., Lount, R. B., Jr., & Murnighan, J. K. (2010). Compensatory ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ethics & Business Law, Opus College of Business, University of St. Thomas, 1000 LaSalle Avenue, TMH 443, Minneapolis, MN, 55402, USA

    Christopher Michaelson

  2. Carroll School of Management, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Fulton Hall 424C, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA

    Michael G. Pratt

  3. The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Suite 2000 SH/DH, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Adam M. Grant

  4. Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Western Washington University, Parks Hall 351, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225-9075, USA

    Craig P. Dunn

Authors
  1. Christopher Michaelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael G. Pratt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam M. Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Craig P. Dunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Michaelson.

Additional information

This article grew out of a panel discussion at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting in Montreal, Canada, in 2010. The authors thank the members of the audience for their feedback. The authors also thank the editors and reviewers of the Journal of Business Ethics for their encouraging and constructive recommendations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaelson, C., Pratt, M.G., Grant, A.M. et al. Meaningful Work: Connecting Business Ethics and Organization Studies. J Bus Ethics 121, 77–90 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5

Keywords

  • Business ethics
  • Human rights
  • Meaning of work
  • Meaningful work
  • Organization studies
  • Positive organizational studies
  • Prosocial behavior