Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 49–64 | Cite as

Reputation, Responsibility, and Stakeholder Support in Scandinavian Firms: A Comparative Analysis

  • Deborah Vidaver-CohenEmail author
  • Peggy Simcic Brønn
Article

Abstract

This paper describes an exploratory study of corporate responsibility, corporate reputation, and stakeholder support in Norway, Sweden and Denmark—countries recognized worldwide as providing an institutional climate uniquely conducive to responsible business practice. Conducting a secondary analysis of Scandinavian data from Reputation Institute’s extensive global research on corporate reputation and responsibility, we examine four key questions: First, do Scandinavians agree with external observers that firms in their countries demonstrate superior levels of corporate responsibility? Second, relative to other reputation drivers, to what extent does corporate responsibility predict corporate reputation for the countries in our dataset? Third, to what extent does corporate responsibility predict stakeholder intent in these countries to engage in supportive behavior toward the firm? Finally, are stakeholder perceptions of and responses to corporate responsibility sufficiently similar across Norway, Sweden, and Denmark to justify claims for a monolithic “Scandinavian approach” to CSR? Previous research examining the relationship of corporate responsibility to corporate reputation and stakeholder support is reviewed, analytical methods are described, results presented, and implications discussed. The article concludes with analysis of study limitations and directions for future research.

Keywords

Corporate reputation Corporate responsibility CSR Corporate citizenship Corporate governance Leadership Ethics Business ethics Corporate social responsibility Moral climate Reputation theory Scandinavia Servant leadership 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Leonard Ponzi, PhD, Charles Fombrun, PhD and Reputation Institute for sharing data from RepTrak™ for use in this research. We thank the Center for International Business Education and Research at Florida International University for generous financial support.

References

  1. Apéria, T., Brønn, P. S., & Schultz, M. (2004). A reputation analysis of the most visible companies in the Scandinavian countries. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aula, P. (2010). Social media, reputation risk and ambient publicity management. Strategy and Leadership, 38(6), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. (2007). Tarred and untarred by the same brush: Exploring interdependence in the volatility of stock returns. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M., & Pollock, T. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bertels, S., & Peloza, J. (2008). Running to stand still: Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boslough, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22(6), 704–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broberg, M. P. (1996). Corporate social responsibility in the European communities—The Scandinavian viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brønn, P. S. (2011a). Marketing and CSR. In Ø. Ihlen, J. Bartlett & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Brønn, P. S. (2011b), Skagen fondene og skattefradrag for humanitære organisasjoner (Skagen fond and tax deductions for humanitarian organizations). Presentation to Norwegian Innsamlingskontrollet (Collection Authorities).Google Scholar
  11. Brønn, P. S., & Ihlen Ø. (2009). Åpen eller innadvendt: omdømmebygging for organisasjoner (Transparent or closed: Reputation Building for Organizations). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  12. Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhanesh, G. (2012). Disconnections? Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment in India. In Conference proceedings of the world public relations forum, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Doolan, D., & Froelicher, E. (2009). Using an existing data set to answer new research questions: A methodological review. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 23(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenegger, M., & Schranz, M. (2011). Reputation management and corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. Mays (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Ellemers, N., Kingma, L., van de Burgt, J., & Barreto, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 1(2), 97–124.Google Scholar
  18. Falkenberg, J., & Brunsael, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A strategic advantage or a strategic necessity? Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation, realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fombrun, C. (2006). The RepTrak™ system. Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary Conference on Reputation, Image, Identity and Competitiveness. New York, NY, 25–28 May 2006.Google Scholar
  21. Fombrun, C. J. (2012). The building blocks of corporate reputation: Definitions, antecedents and consequences. In M. Barnett & T. Pollock (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N., & Sever, J. (1999). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fredriksson, M., & Grafström, M. (2010). Corporate reputation and the news media in Sweden. In C. E. Carroll (Ed.), Corporate reputation and the news media, Agenda-setting within business news coverage in developed, emerging and frontier markets (pp. 192–206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, R. E., Hockerts, K., & Strand, R. (2012). Call for papers: The Scandinavian approach to corporate social responsibility and sustainability thematic symposium of the Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  27. Freeman, E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. Hitt, E. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuing the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gjølberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the ‘Nordic model’. Regulation and Governance, 4, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gjølberg, M. (2011). Explaining regulatory preferences: CSR, soft law, or hard law? Insights from a survey of Nordic pioneers in CSR. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Godfrey, P., Merrill, C., & Hansen, J. (2007). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grenness, T. (2003). Scandinavian managers on Scandinavian management. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 16, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison, J., Bosse, D., & Phillips, R. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts of two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Ihlen, Ø., & Brønn, P. S. (2010). Corporate reputation and the news media in Norway. In C. E. Carroll (Ed.), Corporate reputation and the news media, Agenda-setting within business news coverage in developed, emerging and frontier markets (pp. 153–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson, K. (2004). Building reputational capital. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kidder, L., & Judd, C. (1986). Research methods in social relations (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.Google Scholar
  41. Kjær, P., & Morsing, M. (2010). Corporate reputation and the news media in Denmark. In C. E. Carroll (Ed.), Corporate reputation and the news media, Agenda-setting within business news (pp. 17–35). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Laplume, A., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lopez, M., & Prado, F. (2012). Reputación Corporativa en Perú. Lima: Reputation Institute and Grupo Inmark.Google Scholar
  44. Martinuzzi, A., Kudlak, R., Faber, C., & Wiman, A. (2011). CSR activities and impacts of the retail sector. RIMAS Working Papers, No. 4/2011.Google Scholar
  45. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado A. (2011). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. doi: 10.1002/csr.260.
  47. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & Gjølberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Minor, D., & Morgan, J. (2011). CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mirvis, P. H. (2009). Building reputation here, there and everywhere worldwide views on local impact of corporate responsibility. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.Google Scholar
  50. Montgomery, D., & Ramus, C. (2011). Calibrating MBA job preferences for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morsing, M., Midttun, A., & Palmås, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Scandinavia—A turn towards the business case? In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 98–127). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newburry, W. (2010). Reputation and supportive behavior: Moderating impacts of foreignness, industry and local exposure. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peloza, J. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.Google Scholar
  55. Ponzi, L., Fombrun, C., & Gardberg, N. (2011). RepTrak™ Pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 14, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reputation Institute. (2010, 2011, 2012). Global RepTrak™ pulse reports. New York: Reputation Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Reputation Institute. (2011). Socialization through glo-calization: Engaging audiences in the modern digital landscape. Reputation Intelligence, 2(4), 4–10.Google Scholar
  58. Reputation Institute, Denmark. (2010). RepTrak™ Report Denmark—Tracking of company. Rotterdam, NL: Reputation Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  59. Reputation Institute, Denmark. (2011). Reputation results of the largest companies in the Netherlands. Rotterdam, NL: Reputation Institute, Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  60. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 43–62.Google Scholar
  61. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D., & Sheth, J. (2007). Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  63. Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2011). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Online. ISSN: 1535-3966.Google Scholar
  64. Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in Scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.Google Scholar
  66. Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007a). Reputation beyond the rankings: A conceptual framework for business school research. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278–304.Google Scholar
  67. Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007b). Industry legitimacy and organizational reputation: A model of reciprocal processes. Paper presented at Faculty Research Colloquium, Department of Management and International Business, Florida International University.Google Scholar
  68. Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Brønn, P. (2008). Corporate citizenship and managerial motivation: Implications for business legitimacy. Business and Society Review, 113(4), 441–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vidaver-Cohen, D., Colwell, S., & Reed, L. (2010). Executive servant leadership: A new scale to test if leaders dare to care. In Academy of management best paper proceedings 2010, Academy of management annual meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada.Google Scholar
  70. Weber-Shandwick. (2006). Safeguarding reputation. Issue 2. http://www.webershandwick.com/resources/ws/misc/Safe_Rep_Corp_Respon.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and International BusinessFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Center for Corporate CommunicationNorwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations