Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership

Abstract

A two stage model was developed and tested to explain how ethical leadership relates to followers’ ethical judgment in an organizational context. Drawing on social learning theory, ethical leadership was hypothesized to promote followers’ self-leadership focused on ethics. It was found that followers’ perceived accountability fully accounts for this relationship. In stage two, the relationship between self-leadership focused on ethics and moral judgment in a dual decision-making system was described and tested. Self-leadership focused on ethics was only related to moral judgment when followers use active judgment as opposed to their intuition. This provides support that a deliberate application of self-leadership focused on ethics leads to higher moral judgment. Theoretical and practical implications as well as future research opportunities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this article we consider the terms ethical and moral to be synonymous.

  2. 2.

    The results from analysis using averages rather than factors are similar to those presented here.

References

  1. Anderson, J. S., & Prussia, G. E. (1997). The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashton, N. L., & Severy, L. J. (1976). Arousal and costs in bystander intervention. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 2, 268–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A. Y., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beu, D., & Buckley, M. R. (2001). The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavanagh, S. J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, 7 (pp. 279–293). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Darley, J. (1993). Research on morality: Possible approaches, actual approaches. Psychological Science, 4, 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of asymmetry of endowments and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappen, M. (2007). Managerial models of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gautschi, F. H., I. I. I., & Jones, T. M. (1998). Enhancing the ability of business students to recognize ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness of a course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gebauer, J. E., Broemer, P., Haddock, G., & von Hecker, U. (2008). Inclusion-exclusion of positive and negative past selves: Mood congruence as information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Godwin, J. L., Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (1999). The impact of though self-leadership on individual goal performance: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Development, 18, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Greenwald, A. G., Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haccoun, R. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (1975). Negotiator status and accountability source: A study of negotiator behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 342–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, volume 2: The cognitive science of morality: intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hall, A., Hochwarter, W., & Ferris, G. (2003). Accountability × job efficacy on citizenship and politics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando.

  31. Hardy, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C., & Ferris, G. (2003). Accountability at work: An examination of antecedents and consequences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando.

  33. Holzer, A. (2012). Stanford officials face civil charges. Wall Street Journal, 259(52), pC3–C3, 1/3 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership-questionnaire (aslq): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216–232.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Izraeli, D., & Schwartz, M. S. (1998). What can we learn from the U.S. federal sentencing guidelines for organizational ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent—view. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 66–395.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jones, T. M., & Ryan, L. V. (1997). The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach. Organizational Science, 8(6), 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jordan, A. H., & Monin, B. (2008). From sucker to saint: Moralization in response to self-threat. Psychological Science, 19(8), 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lerner, J., & Tetlock, P. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 34 (pp. 199–249). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lozano, J. A. (2012). Ex-stanford exec gets 3 years for $7B swindle. BusinessWeek, September 13, 2012.

  46. Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1978). Cognitive and self-control therapies. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Borgin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and therapy change (pp. 689–722). New York: Wiley.

  47. Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1979). Selfmanagement: Theory, research and application. In J. P. Brady & D. Pomerleau (Eds.), Behavioral medicine: Theory and practice (pp. 75–96). Baltimore: Williams and Williams.

  48. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (2004). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2011). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(S1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McKenzie, R., & Machan, T. (2003). September 26. Will MBA courses in ethics prevent corporate scandals? Investor’s Business Daily, p. A14.

  54. Neck, C. P. (1996). Thought self-leadership: A self-regulatory approach to overcoming resistance to organizational change. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4, 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research. Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2010). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (5th edition). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

  57. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1994). From groupthink to team think: Toward the creation of constructive thought patterns in self-managing work teams. Human Relations, 47, 929–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Total leadership quality: Integrating employee self-leadership and total quality management. In S. Goush & D. Fedor (Eds.), Advances in the management of organizational quality (pp. 39–77). Greenwich: JAI Press.

  59. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1992). Thought self-leadership: The impact of self-talk and mental imagery on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 681–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Neck, C. P., Neck, H. M., & Manz, C. C. (1997). Thought self-leadership: Mind management for entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Neck, C. P., Stewart, G., & Manz, C. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as a framework for enhancing the performance of performance appraisers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 278–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Perkins, D., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83–105). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pretz, J. E., & Totz, K. S. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Reed, A., I. I., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Reynolds, S. (2006a). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Reynolds, S. (2006b). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Rustichini, A. (2008). Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Schwartz, S. H. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sims, H. P., Jr, & Manz, C. C. (1982). Social learning theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(4), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Stephens, C. U., & Lewin A. Y. (1992). A cross-level model of the determinants of ethical choice in organizations. In D. Ludwig & K. Paul (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the business environment. Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter. Wales: Edwin Mellen Press.

  80. Steward, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Thoresen, C. E., & Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Toor, S.-R., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. VanSandt, C. V., & Neck, C. P. (2003). Bridging ethics and self leadership: Overcoming ethical discrepancies between employee and organizational standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Weber, J. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Williams, E. C., Horton, N. J., Samet, J. H., & Saitz, R. (2007). Do brief measures of readiness to change predict alcohol consumption and consequences in primary care patients with unhealthy alcohol use? Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 428–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2005). Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Yarnold, P. R., Mueser, K. T., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). Type A behavior, accountability and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Youngblut, J. M., & Casper, G. R. (1993). Single-item indicators in nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health, 16, 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Zhu, W. (2008). The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership Review, 8, 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zhu, W., May, D. R., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). The impact of ethical leadership behavior on employee outcomes: The roles of psychological empowerment and authenticity. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Posternak, M. A., Friedman, M., et al. (2006). Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: The reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67, 1536–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Department of Management and the Fogelman College of Business & Economics at the University of Memphis. This research support does not imply endorsement of the research results by either the Fogelman College or the University of Memphis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Steinbauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbauer, R., Renn, R.W., Taylor, R.R. et al. Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership. J Bus Ethics 120, 381–392 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1662-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethical leadership
  • Perceived accountability
  • Self-leadership
  • Moral judgment