Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 381–392 | Cite as

Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Moral Judgment: The Role of Followers’ Perceived Accountability and Self-leadership

  • Robert SteinbauerEmail author
  • Robert W. Renn
  • Robert R. Taylor
  • Phil K. Njoroge
Article

Abstract

A two stage model was developed and tested to explain how ethical leadership relates to followers’ ethical judgment in an organizational context. Drawing on social learning theory, ethical leadership was hypothesized to promote followers’ self-leadership focused on ethics. It was found that followers’ perceived accountability fully accounts for this relationship. In stage two, the relationship between self-leadership focused on ethics and moral judgment in a dual decision-making system was described and tested. Self-leadership focused on ethics was only related to moral judgment when followers use active judgment as opposed to their intuition. This provides support that a deliberate application of self-leadership focused on ethics leads to higher moral judgment. Theoretical and practical implications as well as future research opportunities are discussed.

Keywords

Ethical leadership Perceived accountability Self-leadership Moral judgment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Department of Management and the Fogelman College of Business & Economics at the University of Memphis. This research support does not imply endorsement of the research results by either the Fogelman College or the University of Memphis.

References

  1. Anderson, J. S., & Prussia, G. E. (1997). The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton, N. L., & Severy, L. J. (1976). Arousal and costs in bystander intervention. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 2, 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241–254.Google Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A. Y., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beu, D., & Buckley, M. R. (2001). The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavanagh, S. J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, 7 (pp. 279–293). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darley, J. (1993). Research on morality: Possible approaches, actual approaches. Psychological Science, 4, 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of asymmetry of endowments and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappen, M. (2007). Managerial models of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gautschi, F. H., I. I. I., & Jones, T. M. (1998). Enhancing the ability of business students to recognize ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness of a course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gebauer, J. E., Broemer, P., Haddock, G., & von Hecker, U. (2008). Inclusion-exclusion of positive and negative past selves: Mood congruence as information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godwin, J. L., Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (1999). The impact of though self-leadership on individual goal performance: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Development, 18, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenwald, A. G., Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haccoun, R. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (1975). Negotiator status and accountability source: A study of negotiator behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, volume 2: The cognitive science of morality: intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, A., Hochwarter, W., & Ferris, G. (2003). Accountability × job efficacy on citizenship and politics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando.Google Scholar
  31. Hardy, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C., & Ferris, G. (2003). Accountability at work: An examination of antecedents and consequences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando.Google Scholar
  33. Holzer, A. (2012). Stanford officials face civil charges. Wall Street Journal, 259(52), pC3–C3, 1/3 p.Google Scholar
  34. Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership-questionnaire (aslq): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216–232.Google Scholar
  35. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Izraeli, D., & Schwartz, M. S. (1998). What can we learn from the U.S. federal sentencing guidelines for organizational ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent—view. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 66–395.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, T. M., & Ryan, L. V. (1997). The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach. Organizational Science, 8(6), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jordan, A. H., & Monin, B. (2008). From sucker to saint: Moralization in response to self-threat. Psychological Science, 19(8), 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lerner, J., & Tetlock, P. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 34 (pp. 199–249). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lozano, J. A. (2012). Ex-stanford exec gets 3 years for $7B swindle. BusinessWeek, September 13, 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1978). Cognitive and self-control therapies. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Borgin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and therapy change (pp. 689–722). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1979). Selfmanagement: Theory, research and application. In J. P. Brady & D. Pomerleau (Eds.), Behavioral medicine: Theory and practice (pp. 75–96). Baltimore: Williams and Williams.Google Scholar
  48. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.Google Scholar
  49. Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (2004). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2011). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(S1), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McKenzie, R., & Machan, T. (2003). September 26. Will MBA courses in ethics prevent corporate scandals? Investor’s Business Daily, p. A14.Google Scholar
  54. Neck, C. P. (1996). Thought self-leadership: A self-regulatory approach to overcoming resistance to organizational change. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research. Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2010). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (5th edition). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1994). From groupthink to team think: Toward the creation of constructive thought patterns in self-managing work teams. Human Relations, 47, 929–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Total leadership quality: Integrating employee self-leadership and total quality management. In S. Goush & D. Fedor (Eds.), Advances in the management of organizational quality (pp. 39–77). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  59. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1992). Thought self-leadership: The impact of self-talk and mental imagery on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neck, C. P., Neck, H. M., & Manz, C. C. (1997). Thought self-leadership: Mind management for entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2, 25–36.Google Scholar
  61. Neck, C. P., Stewart, G., & Manz, C. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as a framework for enhancing the performance of performance appraisers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 278–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perkins, D., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83–105). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pretz, J. E., & Totz, K. S. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1247–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Reed, A., I. I., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  71. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reynolds, S. (2006a). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reynolds, S. (2006b). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rustichini, A. (2008). Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schwartz, S. H. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sims, H. P., Jr, & Manz, C. C. (1982). Social learning theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(4), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stephens, C. U., & Lewin A. Y. (1992). A cross-level model of the determinants of ethical choice in organizations. In D. Ludwig & K. Paul (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the business environment. Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter. Wales: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  80. Steward, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thoresen, C. E., & Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  82. Toor, S.-R., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  84. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. VanSandt, C. V., & Neck, C. P. (2003). Bridging ethics and self leadership: Overcoming ethical discrepancies between employee and organizational standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weber, J. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Williams, E. C., Horton, N. J., Samet, J. H., & Saitz, R. (2007). Do brief measures of readiness to change predict alcohol consumption and consequences in primary care patients with unhealthy alcohol use? Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 428–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2005). Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yarnold, P. R., Mueser, K. T., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). Type A behavior, accountability and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Youngblut, J. M., & Casper, G. R. (1993). Single-item indicators in nursing research. Research in Nursing & Health, 16, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhu, W. (2008). The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership Review, 8, 62–73.Google Scholar
  98. Zhu, W., May, D. R., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). The impact of ethical leadership behavior on employee outcomes: The roles of psychological empowerment and authenticity. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Posternak, M. A., Friedman, M., et al. (2006). Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: The reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67, 1536–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Steinbauer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert W. Renn
    • 1
  • Robert R. Taylor
    • 1
  • Phil K. Njoroge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA
  2. 2.School of AccountancyUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations