Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 65–80 | Cite as

Hang on to Your Ego: The Moderating Role of Leader Narcissism on Relationships Between Leader Charisma and Follower Psychological Empowerment and Moral Identity



We develop and test a process model demonstrating how leader charisma and constructive and destructive forms of narcissism interact to influence follower psychological empowerment and moral identity, using survey data from 667 direct reports of leaders from 13 different industries. Study results revealed that leader narcissism moderates the relationship between leader charisma and follower psychological empowerment such that when leaders possess a more constructive and less destructive narcissistic personality, their charisma has a stronger positive relationship with follower psychological empowerment. Study results also revealed that follower psychological empowerment mediates the differential interactive effects of leader charisma and constructive and destructive narcissism on follower moral identity. Implications of these results for future theory development, research, and practice are discussed.


Leader charisma Narcissism Psychological empowerment Self-concept Moral identity 


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2012). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5 development: Proposed revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved August 17, 2012 from
  3. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Puja, B. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barling, J., Christie, A., & Turner, N. (2008). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 851–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  13. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2002). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, M. J., & Pullig, C. (2013). I’m number one! Does narcissism impair ethical judgment even for the highly religious? Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawford, T. N., Cohen, P., Johnson, J. G., Kasen, S., First, M. B., Gordon, K., et al. (2005). Self-reported personality disorder in the children in the community sample: Convergent and prospective validity in late adolescence and adulthood. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(1), 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Giampetro-Meyer, A., Brown, T., Browne, M. N., & Kubasek, N. (1998). Do we really want more leaders in business? Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1727–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman, M. L. (1988). Moral development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. L. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (2nd ed., pp. 205–260). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  28. House, R. J., & Howell, J. M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphreys, J., Zhao, D., Ingram, K., Gladstone, J., & Basham, L. (2010). Situational narcissism and charismatic leadership: A conceptual framework. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 11(2), 118–136.Google Scholar
  31. Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 762–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2007). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8), 150.Google Scholar
  34. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Stamford: Wadsworth/Thompson.Google Scholar
  37. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2006). The leader on the couch: A clinical approach to changing people and organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  39. Kuhnert, K. W., & Lewis, P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. The Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 648–657.Google Scholar
  40. Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2001). Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maccoby, M. (2003). The productive narcissist: The promise and peril of visionary leadership. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  42. Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of personality: DSM-IV-TM and beyond. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paunonen, S. V., Lonnqvist, J. E., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., & Nissinen, V. (2006). Narcissism and emergent leadership in military cadets. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Popper, M. (2011). Toward a theory of followership. Review of General Psychology, 15(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypothesis: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The Leadership Virtues Questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Research and Practice, 62(4), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 557–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheldon, K. M. (2002). The self-concordance model of healthy goal-striving: When personal goals correctly represent the person. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 65–86). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sosik, J. J., & Cameron, J. C. (2010). Character and authentic transformational leadership behavior: Expanding the ascetic self toward others. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sosik, J. J., & Dinger, S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sosik, J. J., Juzbasich, J., & Chun, J. U. (2011). Effects of moral reasoning and management level on ratings of charismatic leadership, in-role and extra-role performance of managers: A multisource examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 434–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement & validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trasier, S., & Eighmy, M. A. (2011). Moral development and narcissism of private and public university business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weaver, G. R. (2006). Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organizational Studies, 27(3), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations (T. Parsons, Trans.) New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wink, P. (1992). Three narcissism scales for the California Q-set. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  65. Zhu, W. (2008). The effect of ethical leadership on follower moral identity: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership Review, 8, 62–73.Google Scholar
  66. Zhu, W., Riggio, R., Avolio, B. J., & Sosik, J. J. (2011). The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: Does transformational/transactional style make a difference? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(2), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Great Valley School of Graduate and Professional StudiesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityMalvernUSA
  2. 2.Management Department, Korea University Business SchoolKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Labor Studies and Employment RelationsThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations