Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 235–244 | Cite as

Negative Affect and Counterproductive Workplace Behavior: The Moderating Role of Moral Disengagement and Gender

  • Al-Karim Samnani
  • Sabrina Deutsch Salamon
  • Parbudyal Singh
Article

Abstract

There has been growing scholarly interest in understanding individual-level antecedents of counterproductive workplace behavior (CWB). While researchers have found a positive relationship between individuals’ negative affect and engagement in CWB, to date, our understanding of the factors which may affect this relationship is limited. In this study, we investigate the moderating roles of moral disengagement and gender in this relationship. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found that individuals with a greater tendency to experience negative emotions were more likely to engage in CWB when they had a higher propensity to morally disengage. Moreover, we found that this interacting relationship varied across men and women. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and offer avenues for future research.

Keywords

Counterproductive workplace behaviors Moral disengagement Gender Deviance 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoli, N., & Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U., & Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1073–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 247–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2011). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0026739.
  11. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. [Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: 1998 with 2000, 2002 and 2005 Amendments, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa)].Google Scholar
  12. Case, J. (2000). Employee theft: The profit killer. Del Mar, CA: John Case & Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiaburu, D. S., & Baker, V. L. (2006). Extra-role behaviors challenging the status-quo: Validity and antecedents of taking charge behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 620–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Claybourn, M. (2011). Relationships between moral disengagement, work characteristics and workplace harassment. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coffin, B. (2003). Breaking the silence on white collar crime. Risk Management, 50, 8.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., & Byrne, Z. S. (2003). The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E. R., & Hulin, C. L. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counter productivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counter productivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 616–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  25. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frank, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harper, D. (1990). Spotlight abuse–save profits. Industrial Distribution, 79(3), 47–51.Google Scholar
  29. Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, G. E., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1996). An empirical examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Illies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, J. B., & Stiver, I. P. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, T. M. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ones, D. S. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on counterproductive behaviors at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, B. W., Harms, P. D., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2007). Can we predict the counterproductive employee? Evidence from a child-to-adult prospective study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1427–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: A critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Miles, J. A. (2003). The impact of gender and setting on perceptions of others’ ethics. Sex Roles, 48(7/8), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spector, P. E. (2011). The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): An integration of perspectives. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 342–352.Google Scholar
  50. Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience negative aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 259–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Al-Karim Samnani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sabrina Deutsch Salamon
    • 3
  • Parbudyal Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Human Resource ManagementYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Odette School of BusinessUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  3. 3.School of Administrative StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations