Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 119, Issue 3, pp 349–364 | Cite as

Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness

Article

Abstract

The link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and competitiveness has been examined mainly at the business level. The purpose of this paper is to improve conceptual understanding and provide empirical evidence on the link between CSR and competitiveness at the national level. We draw on an eclectic-synthetic framework of international economics, strategic management and CSR literatures to explore conceptually whether and how CSR can impact on the competitiveness of nations, and test our hypotheses empirically with a sample of 19 developed countries over a 6-year period. Our evidence suggests that CSR can make a significant positive contribution to national competitiveness, as measured by national living standards. We also find that countries with a relatively low innovation record can benefit more, as compared to highly innovative countries, by implementing nationwide CSR-based positioning strategies.

Keywords

Competitiveness Corporate social performance Corporate social responsibility CSR strategies Innovation National living standards 

References

  1. Achen, C. H. (2001). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, July 20–22, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Aiginger, K. (2006). Competitiveness: From a dangerous obsession to a welfare creating ability with positive externalities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality and growth. What do the data say? Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  15. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: Update and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  17. Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072–1085.Google Scholar
  18. Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (2000). The role of financial development in growth and investment. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beurden, P. V., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of values—A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boehe, D. M., & Cruz, L. B. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, product differentiation strategy and export performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Temple, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. CEPR Discussion Paper 3048, Centre of Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  22. Boulouta, I. (2012). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7.
  23. Brown, B. (1998). Do stock market investors reward companies with reputations for social performance? Corporate Reputation Review, 1(3), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Business Innovation and Skills. (2008). Corporate responsibility report. UK Government Publication. Online, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file50312.pdf.
  25. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  26. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., & Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  30. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M., & Beal, B. (1999). The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and directions. Journal of Management, 25, 317–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Deakin, S., & Whittaker, D. H. (2007). Re-embedding the Corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dunning, J. H. (Ed.). (2003). Making globalization good: The moral challenges of global capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & De Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.Google Scholar
  38. European Commission. (2008a). Communication from the commission on the European competitiveness report 2008. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  39. European Commission. (2008b). European Competitiveness Report 2008. Luxemburg: EC.Google Scholar
  40. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  41. Fageberg, D., Mowery, R., & Nelson, R. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  44. Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.Google Scholar
  45. Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Reconciling aspiration with application (pp. 9–23). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32–33, 122–126.Google Scholar
  47. Frynas, J. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development: Critical assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Garcia-Castro, R., Arino, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Halaby, C. (2004). Panel models in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hansen, L. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hart, S., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business, Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hausman, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2008). The global gender gap report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  55. Henderson, J. V. (2005). New economic geography. Northampton, MA: Elgar.Google Scholar
  56. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Holme, R., & Watts, P. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  58. Hopkins, M. (2003). The planetary bargain: Corporate social responsibility matters. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  59. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Husted, B., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximising profit and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2006). How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analyses of capitalist diversity. MPIfG Discussion paper No. 06/2, Max Plank Institute for the Study of Societies, Koln.Google Scholar
  63. Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jones, C. I. (2006). Introduction to Economic Growth (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  65. Jones, I. W., Pollitt, M., & Bek, D. (2007). Multinationals in their communities: A social capital approach to corporate citizenship projects. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2012). Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Knopf, J., Kahlenborn, W., Hajduk, T., Weiss, D., Feil, M., Fiedler, R., & Klein, J. (2011). CSR: National public policies in the European Union. European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  68. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness, a dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Logsdon, J., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: from domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. MacGillivray, A., Begley, P., & Zadek, S. (Eds.). (2007). The state of responsible competitiveness 2007. London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar
  73. MacGillivray, A., Sabapathy, J., & Zadek, S. (2003). Responsible competitiveness index 2003. London: AccountAbility and the Copenhagen Centre.Google Scholar
  74. Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, M. A., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20, 1034–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marens, R. (2004). Wobbling on a one-legged stool: The Decline of American Pluralism and the Academic Treatment of corporate social responsibility’. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2, 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  77. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  81. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D., & Cory, K. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of the resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Montgomery, D. B., & Ramus, C. A. (2011). Calibrating MBA Job Preferences for the 21st Century. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 427–451.Google Scholar
  85. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Peng, G. Z., & Beamish, P. W. (2008). The effect of national corporate responsibility environment on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Pitelis, C. N. (2004). (Corporate) governance, (shareholder) value and (sustainable) economic performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12, 209–222.Google Scholar
  89. Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The sustainable competitive advantage and catching-up of nations: FDI, clusters and the liability (asset) of smallness. Management International Review, 49, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pitelis, C. N., & Vasilaros, V. (2010). The determinants of value and wealth creation at the firm, industry, and national levels: A conceptual framework and evidence. Contributions to Political Economy, Special Issue on ‘Dynamic Regions in the Global Economy’, 29(1), 33–58.Google Scholar
  91. Pollitt, M. (2002). The economics of trust, norms and networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  93. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  94. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  95. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.Google Scholar
  96. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.Google Scholar
  97. Porter, M. E., & Schwab, K. (Eds.). (2008). The global competitiveness report 2008–2009. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  98. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pralahad, C. K. (2004). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  100. Ram, R. (1992). International inequalities in human development and real income. Economics Letters, 38, 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Reinert, E. S. (1994). A Schumpeterian theory of underdevelopment—A contradiction in terms? In Fifth Conference of the International J.A. Schumpeter Society, August 17–20, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  102. Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rodrik, D. (2004). Rethinking growth policies in the developing world. Working Paper, J.F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  104. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9, 86–136.Google Scholar
  105. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sabapathy, J., & Weiser, J. (2003). Community enabled innovation—Companies, communities and innovation. London: AccountAbility in Association with Body Weiser Burns.Google Scholar
  107. Sargan, J. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26, 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Scherer, A., & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the US model business principles—Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40, 351–371.Google Scholar
  111. Schnietz, K., & Epstein, M. J. (2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  113. Schwab, K. (Ed.). (2009). The global competitiveness report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  114. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Scott, B. R. (1985). U.S. Competitiveness: Concepts, performance, and implications. In B. R. Scott & G. Lodge (Eds.), U.S. Competitiveness in the World Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  116. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shapiro, H., & Taylor, L. (1990). The state and industrial strategy. World Development, 18(6), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Siegel, D., & Vitaliano, D. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17, 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Snowdon, B., & Stonehouse, G. (2006). Competitiveness in a globalized world: Michael Porter on the microeconomic foundations of the competitiveness of nations, regions, and firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  121. Swift, T., & Zadek, S. (2002). Corporate responsibility and the competitive advantage of nations. London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar
  122. Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on ‘Profiting from Innovation’. Research Policy, 35(8), 1131–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Teece, D. J. (2011). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, A. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Welford, R. (2003). Beyond systems: A vision for corporate environmental management for the future. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Westney, D. E. (1993). Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghosal & D. E. Westney (Eds.), Organization theory and multinational corporation. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  128. Williamson, O. E. (2005). The economics of governance. American Economic Review, 95, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.Google Scholar
  130. Zadek, S. (2006). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6, 334–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zadek, S., Raynard, P., & Oliveira, C. (2005). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. London: AccountAbility and Fundacao Dom Cabral (FDC).Google Scholar
  132. Zenghelis, D., & Stern, N. (2007). The Stern review. In A. MacGillivray, P. Begley, & S. Zadek (Eds.), The state of responsible competitiveness 2007. London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lecturer in Management, Department of Management, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Judge Business SchoolUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations