Ethics and Expertise: A Social Networks Perspective

Abstract

Results from three field network studies show that depending on individuals’ network positions (central or peripheral), experts and novices have varying ethical predispositions (EP). In particular, central experts (vs. peripheral experts) have higher EP, while novices in the same positions (vs. peripheral novices) have lower EP. Results demonstrate individuals’ relational-interdependent self-construal mediates these relationships. Importantly, this research suggests that the interaction between network and individual difference variables uniquely affect individuals’ ethical predisposition. Given the lack of research focus on the impact of structural positions on EP, this article demonstrates the importance of combining network and individual variables to investigate individuals’ EP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ahluwalia, R. (2008). How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self-construal. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(June), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bock, T. D., & Van Kenhove, P. (2010). Consumer ethics: The role of self regulatory focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady, N. F., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 23(1), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Browning, J., & Zabriskie, N. B. (1983). How ethical are industrial buyers. Industrial Marketing Management, 12(4), 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7(3), 255–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2001). Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23(3), 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of self-construal. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 19(2), 157–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fong, Y.-f. (2005). When do experts cheat and whom do they target? Journal of Economics, 36(1), 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fullerton, S., Kerch, K. B., & Dodge, H. R. (1996). Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Iacobucci, D., & Hopkins, N. (1992). Modeling dyadic interactions and networks in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Janicik, G. A., & Larrick, R. P. (2005). Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jussim, L. (1991). Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psychological Review, 98(1), 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E., & Bethke, A. L. (1987). Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: Myth or reality? Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim, M.-S., Sharkey, W. F., & Singelis, T. (1994). The relationship between individuals’ self-construals and perceived importance of interactive constraints. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(1), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, S. H. M., Cotte, J., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2010). The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mitchell, A. A., & Dacin, P. A. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Morling, B., & Fiske, S. (1999). Defining and measuring harmony control. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(4), 379–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Muncy, J., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedure: Issues and applications. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of though: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., Wiebe, F. A., & Barnes, J. H. (1994). Consumer ethical belief and personality traits: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rawwas, M. Y. (1996). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 1009–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rawwas, M. Y. (2001). Culture, personality and morality: A typology of international consumers’ ethical beliefs. International Marketing Review, 18(2), 188–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1986). Analysis of referral networks in marketing: Methods and illustration. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Reynolds, K. L., & Harris, L. C. (2009). Dysfunctional customer behavior severity: An empirical examination. Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Singelis, T. M., & Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal, and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6), 622–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sirsi, A. K., Ward, J. C., & Reingen, P. H. (1996). Microcultural analysis of variation in sharing of causal reasoning about behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Steenhaut, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values, ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Swaidan, Z., Vitell, S. J., Rose, G. M., & Gilbert, F. W. (2006). Consumer ethics: The role of acculturation in U.S. immigrant population. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3(3), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  76. West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Hwan Mark Lee.

Additional information

The author thanks Fern Lin for her feedback and support on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Regression analyses for all studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.H.M. Ethics and Expertise: A Social Networks Perspective. J Bus Ethics 118, 607–621 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1609-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Experts
  • Novices
  • Ethical predisposition
  • Network centrality