Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 85–102 | Cite as

Will Women Lead the Way? Differences in Demand for Corporate Social Responsibility Information for Investment Decisions

Article

Abstract

Recent years have featured a leap in academic and public interest in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities and related corporate reporting. Two main themes in this literature are the exploration of management incentives to engage in and disclose this information, and of the use and value of this information to market participants. We extend the second theme by examining the interest that specific investor classes have in the use of CSR information. We rely on feminist intersectionality, which suggests that gender intersects with other identities to yield different values, experiences, and opportunities that can lead to gender-based preferences for CSR information. Based upon a survey of 750 US-based retail investors, we find that female retail investors have a greater interest in the use of CSR information, relative to male retail investors. Women express greater anticipated future demand for this information than do men. Further, the magnitude of the increase from current use to anticipated future demand is greater for women than men. Age is a significant modifying factor in that the discrepancy between women of any age and older men is greater than that between women and younger men. Finally, women also exhibit greater demand for streamlining of the information flow, consistent with pressures induced by time poverty. It appears that current disclosure practices provide a less than optimal match with the needs of the information consumers that are primarily interested in using this information. This mismatch may result in a systematic disenfranchisement of female investing classes which suggests an ethical need to level the playing field.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Investment behavior Gender Feminist intersectionality Ethics 

References

  1. Adams, A., Fries, S., & Simnett, R. (2011, May). The journey towards integrative reporting. Accountant’s Digest, Issue 558.Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurste, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 969–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, D. E., Albrecht, C. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (2000). Poverty in nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of industrial, employment, and family structure variables. Rural Sociology, 65, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almer, E. D., Cohen, J. R., & Single, L. E. (2003). Factors affecting the choice to participate in flexible work arrangements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almer, E. D., Lightbody, M., Single, L., & Vigilante, B. (2011). New leadership tracks in accounting firms. An alternative to the partnership. Current Issues in Auditing, 5(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes II, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5/6), 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1994). Improving business reporting—A customer focus: Meeting the information needs of investors and creditors. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
  8. American Institution of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2006). AICPA work/life and women’s initiatives 2004 research. A decade of changes in the accounting profession: Workforce trends and human capital practices. New York, NY: AICPA.Google Scholar
  9. Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anderson, J. C., Johnson, E., & Reckers, P. (1994). Perceived effects of gender, family structure and physical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(6), 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 5, 111–150.Google Scholar
  12. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionalry. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barber, N., Dodd, T. H., & Kolyesnikova, N. (2009). Gender differences in information search: Implications for retailing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barua, A., Davidson, L. F., Rama, D. V., & Thiruvadi, S. (2009). CFO gender and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beal, D. J., & Goyen, M. (1998). Putting your money where your mouth is: A profile of ethical investors. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Beal, D. J., Goyen, M., & Phillips, P. (2005). Why do we invest ethically? Journal of Investing, 14(3), 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bianchi, S. M. (2011). Changing families, changing workplaces. The Future of Children, 21(2), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
  24. Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2002). Highlights of the national study of the changing workforce, executive summary. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Bottero, W. (2000). Gender and the labor market at the turn of the century: Complexity, ambiguity and change. Work, Employment & Society, 14, 781–791.Google Scholar
  26. Brown-Liburd, H., Cohen, J., & Zamora, T. (2011). The effects of corporate social responsibility investment, assurance and perceived fairness on investors’ judgments. Boston College: Working Paper.Google Scholar
  27. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Employed persons by occupation, sex, and age in household data annual averages. Retrieved from January 5, 2011. ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aat9.txt.
  28. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cancian, F. M., & Olinker, S. J. (2000). Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  30. Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1999). Career concerns of mutual fund managers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 389–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chua, W. (2006). Extended performance reporting: A review of empirical studies. White paper, Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. Retrieved from January 5, 2011. http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/Industry-Topics/Reporting/Resources-and-toolkits/~/media/Files/Industry%20topics/Reporting/Resources%20and%20toolkits/Reports/EPR_review_of_empirical_studies.ashx.
  32. Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60, 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cohen, J., Holder-Webb, L., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2011). Retail investors’ perceptions of the decision-usefulness of economic performance, governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen, J., Holder-Webb, L., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2012). Corporate reporting of non-financial leading indicators of economic performance and sustainability. Accounting Horizons, 26(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  37. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Darley, W. K., & Smith, R. E. (1995). Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Drago, R. W. (2007). Striking a balance: Work, family, life. Boston, MA: Dollars & Sense.Google Scholar
  42. Dwyer, P. D., Gilkeson, J. H., & List, J. A. (2002). Gender differences in revealed risk-taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Economic Letters, 76(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2006). Examining gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: It’s not Mars and Venus. Feminism and Psychology, 16(1), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Traunter (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Elliot, W., Hodge, F., Kennedy, J., & Pronk, M. (2007). Are M.B.A. students a good proxy for non-professional investors? The Accounting Review, 82(1), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Felton, J., Gibson, B., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (2004). Preference for risk in investing as a function of trait optimism and gender. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 4(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Folbre, N. (2008). Reforming care. Politics & Society, 36(3), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2009). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making from accounting conservatism. Troy: Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Freudenburg, W. R., & Davidson, D. J. (2007). Nuclear families and nuclear risks: The effects of gender, geography, and progeny on attitudes toward nuclear waste facility. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gelvin, K. (2007). The coming of age of SRI. Financial Planning, 37(8), 56.Google Scholar
  52. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2011). G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.1 Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative. http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/ReportingFrameworkOverview/.
  53. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Grable, J. E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Graham, J. F., Stendardi, E. J., Jr, Myers, J. K., & Graham, M. J. (2002). Gender differences in investment strategies: An information processing perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Greenstein, T. N. (2009). National context, family satisfaction, and fairness in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1039–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Hancock, P. A., & Rausch, R. (2010). The effects of sex, age, and interval duration on the perception of time. Acta Psychologica, 133, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hira, T. K., & Loible, C. (2008). Gender differences in investment behavior. In J. J. Xiao (Ed.), Handbook of consumer finance research (pp. 253–270). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The Timebind. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  62. Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). A comparison of models describing the impact of moral decision making on investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2008). A survey of governance disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 543–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hull, R., & Umansky, P. (1997). An examination of gender stereotyping an explanation for vertical job segregation in public accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(6), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict (pp. 107–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Ittner, C., & Larcker, D. (1998). Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(3), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Joos, P., & Zhdanov, A. (2008). Earnings and equity valuation in the biotech industry: Theory and evidence. Financial Management, 37, 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Laroche, M., Saad, G., Cleveland, M., & Browne, E. (2000). Gender differences in information search strategies for a Christmas gift. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 500–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lattman, P. (2010, September 16). Three women claim gender bias at Goldman. New York Times B1.Google Scholar
  72. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37, 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lewis, A., Webley, P., Winnett, A., & MacKenzie, C. (1998). Morals and markets: Some theoretical and policy implications of ethical investing. In P. Taylor-Goodby (Ed.), Choice & public policy: The limits of welfare markets (pp. 164–182). Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  75. Lougee, B., & Wallace, J. (2008). The corporate social responsibility (CSR) trend. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Maines, L. A., Bartov, E., Fairfield, P. M., Hirst, D. E., Iannaconi, T. E., Malett, R., et al. (2002). Recommendations on disclosure of nonfinancial performance measures. Accounting Horizons, 16(4), 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81, 999–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1772–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McKinsey & Co. (2002). Global Investor Opinion Survey: Key Findings. Google Scholar
  81. McLachlan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mesch, D. (2010). Women give 2010: Women give more to charity than men, study shows. Women’s Philanthropy Institute. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/womengive/.
  83. Niessen, A. & Ruenzi, S. (2007). Sex matters: Gender and mutual funds. Working paper, Centre for Financial Research, Cologne. CFR Working Paper No. 06-01.Google Scholar
  84. Oates, C., & McDonald, S. (2006). Recycling and the domestic division of labor: Is green pink or blue? Sociology, 40(3), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pasewark, W. R., & Riley, M. E. (2010). It’s a matter of principle: The role of personal values in investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Penner, A. M. & Petersen, T. (2004). Race and gender discrimination in a large financial company. Working paper, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  88. Prudential Financial. (2005). Study on the financial experience and behaviors among women. Newark, NJ: Prudential Insurance Company of America.Google Scholar
  89. Raubenheimer, J. E. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.Google Scholar
  90. Ritchie, A., Lloyd, C. B., & Grant, M. (2004). Gender differences in time use among adolescents in developing countries: Implications of rising school enrollment rates. Policy Research Division Working Paper, 193. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  91. Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  92. Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (1999). Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse? The American Economic Review, 89(2), 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. SEC. (2010). Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml.
  94. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). (2008). The investor’s advocate: How the SEC protects investors, maintains market integrity, and facilitates capital formation. Washington, DC: Securities Exchange Commission.Google Scholar
  95. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association [SIFMA]. (2008). Equity and bond ownership in America 2008. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and Investment Company Institute, New York.Google Scholar
  96. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Simnett, R., Nugent, M., & Huggins, A. (2009a). Developing an international assurance standard on greenhouse gas statements. Accounting Horizons, 23(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009b). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84, 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Social Investment Forum. (2006). 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the U.S.: 10 Year review. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum Industry Research Program.Google Scholar
  100. Spies, S., Murdock, S. H., White, S., Krannich, R., Wulfhorst, J. D., Wrigely, K., et al. (1998). Support for waste facility siting: Differences between community leaders and residents. Rural Sociology, 63(1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stempel, J. (2008, April 4). Citigroup confirms $33 mln gender bias settlement. Reuters. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/04/04/citigroup-bias-settlement-idUSN0439827920080404).
  103. Stempel, J. & Comlay, E. (2009, June 25). Bank of America sued for gender bias over bonuses. Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/25/us-bankofamerica-merrill-bias-lawsuit-idUSTRE55O5AT20090625).
  104. Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
  106. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Current population survey, 2011 annual social and economic supplement.Google Scholar
  107. Wu, Q., Francis, B., & Hasan, I. (2010). The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy.Google Scholar
  108. White, L., & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990 s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Winn, J., & Heeter, C. (2009). Gaming, gender, and time: Who makes time to play? Sex Roles, 61(1/2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wood, D., & Hoff, B. (2008). The use of non-financial information: What do investors want? White paper report on project findings from the Center for Corporate Citizenship at the Institute for Responsible Investment, Boston College. Prepared for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Investor Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  111. Worley, D. (1998). Women finding investment a necessity, many band together, create investment clubs, Florida Today, 10 February, p. 12C, cited in J. F. Graham, E. J. Stendardi Jr., J. K. Myers, & M. J. Graham. (2002). Gender Differences in Investment Strategies: An Information Processing Perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  112. Worthington, A., & Higgs, H. (2004). Factors explaining the choice of an economics major: The role of student characteristics, personality and perceptions of the problem. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(5/6), 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wulfhorst, J. D., & Krannich, R. S. (1999). Effects on collective morale from technological risk. Society and Natural Resources, 12(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminal JusticeUniversity of Wisconsin—WhitewaterWhitewaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Accounting and FinanceWestern New England UniversitySpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of AccountingCarroll School of ManagementChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations