Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 721–734 | Cite as

The Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of Its Presence in Top Management Teams

Article

Abstract

I present a review of the top management teams (TMTs) of the largest public corporations in the U.S. and Scandinavia (one thousand in total) to identify corporations that have a TMT position with “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) or a “CSR synonym” like sustainability or citizenship explicitly included in the position title. Through this I present three key findings. First, I establish that a number of CSR TMT positions exist and I list all identified corporations and associated position titles. Second, I show that Scandinavian corporations are significantly more likely than U.S. corporations to have such CSR TMT positions. This finding serves as evidence that the U.S. may have been surpassed by a subset of Europe, i.e., Scandinavia, in at least one relevant measure of explicit CSR, whereby this study may serve witness to a noteworthy juncture post Matten and Moon’s (Academy of Management Review, 33(2):404–424, 2008) “Implicit & Explicit CSR” article. And third, I show that corporations with a CSR TMT position are three times more likely to be included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) than corporations with none. A range of further research opportunities stemming from these findings include exploring whether explicit attention to CSR by the corporation is indicative of a longer term trend that has to do with attention to responsible business and whether a move away from the expression ‘CSR’ toward the expression ‘sustainability’ is underway and what this may entail.

Keywords

Chief Officer of CSR Chief Sustainability Officer C-Suite Top management team Scandinavia U.S. Explicit CSR 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254–285.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, E., & Eisenman, M. (2008). Employee-management techniques: Transient fads or trending fashions? Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 719–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amidon, D. (1998). The evolving community of knowledge practice: The Ken awakening. International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1/2/3), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. AT&T. (2009). AT&T Appoints First Chief Sustainability Officer. Press Release May 14, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=26816&mapcode=.
  6. Balch, O. (2011). Chief sustainability officers: CSOs in the C-suite. The Ethical Corporation. April.Google Scholar
  7. Bjerke, B. (1999). Business leadership and culture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Bondeson, U. (2003). Nordic moral climates: Value continuities and discontinuities in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Bontis, N. (2001). CKO wanted—evangelical skills necessary: A review of the chief knowledge officer position. Knowledge and Process Management, 8(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, D., & Knudsen, J. S. (2012). Managing corporate responsibility globally and locally: Lessons from a CR leader. Business and Politics, 14(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  11. Brubaker, R. (1991). The limits of rationality: An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, J. (2008). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy, and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 813–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatterji, A. & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, Winter.Google Scholar
  16. Chatterji, A., Levine, D., & Toffel, M. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, S. F. (2006, September). Scandinavian irony: Socialism meets liberalization. The Freeman Ideas on Liberty, 29–33.Google Scholar
  18. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2008). The corporate social responsibility agenda. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denmark Ministry of Economic & Business Affairs. (2008). New law brings Denmark in the lead concerning CSR. Retrieved December 15, from www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/9.1_news_archives/2008_12_17/Danish_CSR_Law.pdf.
  21. Deutsch, C. H. (2007, July 3). Companies giving green an office. New York Times.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Earl, M., & Scott, I. (1999). What is a chief knowledge officer? Sloan Management Review, 40(2), 29–38.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard—linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership—theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gjølberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model.” Regulation & Governance, 4, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gond, J., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business & Society, 49(4), 677–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gourji, L. (2008, January/February). Adding sustainability to the C-Suite. Corporate Board Member Magazine. Retrieved October 31, 2010, from www.boardmember.com/MagazineArticle_Details.aspx?id=417.
  33. Green, S. (1988). Strategy, organizational culture and symbolism. Long Range Planning, 21(4), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grennes, T. (2003). Scandinavian managers on Scandinavian management. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 16, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Groysberg, B., Kelly, K., & MacDonald, B. (2011, March). The new path to the C-Suite. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  36. Guthey, E., Langer, R., & Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility is a management fashion. So what? In M. Morsing & S. Bechmann (Eds.), Strategic CSR communication (pp. 39–60). Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
  38. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  40. Just Means. (2010). Sweden and Denmark lead the way in sustainability reporting. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.justmeans.com/press-releases/Sweden-and-Denmark-lead-the-way-in-Sustainability-Reporting/6164.html.
  41. Keefe, R. (2010). Meet Google’s Chief Sustainability Officer. Divine Caroline blog. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.divinecaroline.com/22277/44799-meet-google-s-chief-sustainability-officer/3.
  42. Lunheim, R. (2005). Confessions of a corporate window dresser. Leading Perspectives, Summer.Google Scholar
  43. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.Google Scholar
  44. Marrewijk, M. V. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCallin, J. & Webb, T. (2004). Corporate responsibility progress in Scandinavia. Ethical Corporation. January.Google Scholar
  48. McKinsey, (2010). How companies manage sustainability. McKinsey Global Survey. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://download.mckinseyquarterly.com/sustainability.pdf.
  49. McNulty, E. & Davis, R. (2010, December). Should the C-Suite have a “Green” Suite? Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  50. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & Gjølberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance—The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(4), 369–385.Google Scholar
  51. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Mirvis, P., & Googines, B. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morsing, M. (2011). State-owned enterprises: A corporatization of governments? Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 710–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morsing, M., Midttun, A., & Palmås, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Scandinavia—a turn towards the business case? In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 98–127). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2009). Sustainable leadership: Management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nasi, J. (1995). A Scandinavian approach to stakeholder thinking: An analysis of its theoretical and practical uses, 1964–1980. In J. Nasi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 97–115). Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar
  59. Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordstrom, B. (2000). Scandinavia since 1500. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2009). Norwegian companies should be among the best at practising CSR. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.regjeringen.no.
  62. Norwegian Storting. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Report No. 10 to the Storting. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.regjeringen.no.
  63. Novo Nordisk. (2002). Novo Nordisk appoints Lise Kingo, Head of Stakeholder Relations, Member of the Executive Committee. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from www.novonordisk.com/investors.
  64. Panapanaan, V., & Linnanen, L. (2009). Finland. In S. O. Idowu & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Global practices of corporate social responsibility (pp. 73–102). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pauleen, D. J. (2011). Riding the knowledge management wave to job security. Emerald Research Resources. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from www.emeraldinsight.com/librarians/info/viewpoints/security.htm.
  66. Pedersen, E. R. (2006). Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and Society Review, 111(2), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.Google Scholar
  68. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  69. Ritzer, G. (1983). The “McDonaldization” of society. Journal of American Culture, 6, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2009). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  72. Schwartz, M., & Carroll, A. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks. The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47(2), 148–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in Scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sweden.Se. (2010). CSR: Sweden leads by example in CSR. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.sweden.se/eng/Home/Business/Ethics_and_Business/Facts/CSR/.
  75. The Economist. (2008, January 19). Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility. The Economist.Google Scholar
  76. UN Global Compact. (2008). Denmark introduces mandatory CSR reporting for large companies. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from www.unglobalcompact.org/newsandevents/news_archives/2008_12_17.html.
  77. Vallentin, S., & Murillo, D. (2010). Government, governance and collaborative social responsibility. In A. Tencati & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), The collaborative enterprise (pp. 209–227). Oxford: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  78. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York.Google Scholar
  79. Weber, M. (1978). Bureaucracy. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society. 2 Volumes, University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  80. Weber, M. (1980). Socialism (D. Hÿrch, Trans.). In J. E. T Eldridge (Ed.), Max Weber: The interpretation of social reality (pp. 191–219). New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
  81. Weiers, R. (2008). Introduction to business statistics (6th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  82. Welch, J. (2005). Winning. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Focusing on value: Reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of General Management, 28(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  84. Whitley, R. (1997). Business systems. In A. Sorge & M. Warner (Eds.), The IEBM handbook of organizational behaviour (pp. 173–186). London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  85. Zorn, D. (2004). Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the American firm. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zorn, T., & Collins, E. (2007). Is sustainability sustainable? Corporate social responsibility, sustainable business, and management fashion. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 405–416). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business School, Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (cbsCSR)FrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations