Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 37–44 | Cite as

Initial Impressions Determine Behaviours: Morality Predicts the Willingness to Help Newcomers

  • Stefano PagliaroEmail author
  • Marco Brambilla
  • Simona Sacchi
  • Manuela D’Angelo
  • Naomi Ellemers
Article

Abstract

Prior research has demonstrated the impact of morality (vs. competence) information for impression formation. This study examines behavioral implications of people’s initial impressions based on information about their morality vs. competence in a workplace. School teachers and employees (N = 79) were asked to form an impression of a new school manager (i.e. a prospective boss), who was presented as High vs. Low in Morality and High vs. Low in Competence. Results showed that morality information rather than competence information determined initial emotional responses to the new manager, which mediated willingness to help the newcomer adjust in task and social contexts. Results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications and future research directions are outlined.

Keywords

Impression formation Morality Behaviour 

References

  1. Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., & Sedikides, C. (1991). Thinking about people: Contributions of a typological alternative to associationistic and dimensional models of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P. P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P. P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61–149). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences on the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellemers, N., Kingma, L., Van den Burgt, J., & Barreto, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 1, 97–124.Google Scholar
  10. Ellemers, N. & van den Bos, K. (in press). Morality in groups: On the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong. Social and Personality Psychology Compass.Google Scholar
  11. Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “Holier Than Thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forte, A. (2004). Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gausel, N., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, D. -Y., Lin, Y. -C., & Lin, L. -C. (2011). Business moral values of supervisors and subordinates and their effect on employee effectiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (in press). Groups and morality. In J. Simpson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Interpersonal Relationships and Group Processes (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leach, C. W., Minescu, A., Poppe, E., & Hagendoorn, L. (2008). Generality and specificity in stereotypes of out-group power and benevolence: Views of Chechens and Jews in the Russian federation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1165–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maclagan, P. (1990). Moral behaviour in organizations: The contribution of management education and development. British Journal of Management, 1, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maclagan, P., & Snell, R. (1992). Some implications for management development of research into managers’ moral dilemmas. British Journal of Management, 3, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martijn, C., Spears, R., Van Der Pligt, J., & Jakobs, E. (1992). Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Pagliaro, S. (2012). On the relevance of morality in social psychology: An introduction to a virtual special issue. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2011). Sharing moral values: Anticipated in-group respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1117–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.Google Scholar
  30. Phalet, K., & Poppe, E. (1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). The role of honour concerns in emotional reactions to offences. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruffy, M. (1981). Influence of social factors in the development of the young child’s moral judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7, 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., Esses, V. M., Stephan, C. W., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trafimow, D., & Trafimow, S. (1999). Mapping imperfect and perfect duties onto hierarchically and partially restrictive trait dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 686–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group-engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vonk, R. (1996). Negativity and potency effects in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 851–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weber, J., & McGivern, L. (2010). A New methodological approach for studying moral reasoning among managers in business settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impression: Making up your mind after a 100-Ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Pagliaro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marco Brambilla
    • 2
  • Simona Sacchi
    • 2
  • Manuela D’Angelo
    • 3
  • Naomi Ellemers
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySeconda Università di NapoliCasertaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  3. 3.Università di Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly
  4. 4.Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Instituut Psychologie, Sociale en OrganisatiepsychologieUniversity of LeidenLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations